Comunidades de práctica e innovaciónaprender a emprender en el área de Bibliotecología y Ciencias de la Documentación

  1. Rosario Arquero Avilés
  2. Gonzalo Marco Cuenca
  3. Silvia Cobo Serrano
  4. L. Fernando Ramos Simón
Revue:
Investigación bibliotecológica

ISSN: 2448-8321 0187-358X

Année de publication: 2014

Volumen: 28

Número: 63

Pages: 193-222

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S0187-358X(14)72580-8 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Investigación bibliotecológica

Résumé

This study aims to provide guidelines for designing, creating and developing a Community of Practice (CoP) in the area Library and Documentation Science. Such a CoP offers the potential of bringing together persons with shared interests and objectives who can reap real benefits through the generation of shared knowledge. The paper presents a case study involving an educational project with master degree candidates in the Documentation, Libraries and Archives Management of the Faculty of the Documentary Science of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain). This case provides a view of the effective use of CoP, which constitutes a scenario or network for exchange of shared knowledge, while underpinning educational learning and promoting the culture of innovation and enterprise among the members of the community.

Références bibliographiques

  • Adeyoyin, S. O., Akinyosoye, H. I. T.. (2004). Retrospective conversion in a Nigerian research library: Migrating from TINMAN/TINLIB to CDS/ISIS. The Electronic Library. 22. 331-334
  • Allan, B.. (2004). Project management: Tools and techniques for today's ILS professional. Facet. London.
  • Anderson, D. R.. (1998). Method without madness: Shelf-reading methods and project management. College and Undergraduate Libraries. 5. 1-13
  • Anzalone, F. M.. (2000). Project management: A technique for coping with change. Law Library Journal. 92. 53-70
  • Arquero, R., García-Ochoa, M. L.. (2005). La hemeroteca de prensa. Trea. Madrid.
  • Atkinson, R.. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management. 17. 337-342
  • Barwick, J.. (2007). Building an institutional repository at Loughborough University: Some experiences. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems. 41. 113-123
  • Betty, P.. (2008). Creation, management, and assessment of library screencasts: The Regis Libraries Animated Tutorials Project. Journal of Library Administration. 48. 295-315
  • (2010). Plan Estratégico 2010-2013.
  • (2013). Nuestras bibliotecas.
  • Black, K.. (1996). Project management for library and information service professionals. Aslib. London.
  • Brown, J., Duguid, P.. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organizational Science. 2. 40-57
  • Bryson, J.. (1997). Managing information services: An integrated approach. Gower. Aldershot.
  • Bryson, J.. (1999). Effective library and information centre management. 2. Gower. Aldershot.
  • Bueno Campos, E.. (1996). Dirección estratégica de la empresa: metodología, técnica y casos. Pirámide. Madrid.
  • Burich, N. J., Casey, A. M., Devlin, F. A., Ivanitskaya, L.. (2006). Project management and institutional collaboration in libraries. Technical Services Quarterly. 24.
  • Carpenter, J.. (2008). Library project funding: A guide to planning and writing proposals. Chandos. Oxford.
  • Carpenter, J.. (2011). Project management in libraries, archives and museums: Working with government and other external partners. Chandos. Oxford.
  • Chellapandi, S., Han, C. W., Boon, T. C.. (2010). The National Library of Singapore experience: Harnessing technology to deliver content and broaden access. Interlending & Document Supply. 38. 40-48
  • Clements, C.. (2009). Implementing instant messaging in four university libraries. Library Hi Tech. 27. 393-402
  • Darko-Ampem, K.. (2006). Retrospective conversion of serials and card catalogue records: A case study of project management in academic libraries. Library Management. 27. 121-134
  • DeRidder, J. L.. (2007). Choosing software for a digital library. Library Hi Tech News. 24. 19-21
  • Duncan, V., Gerrard, A.. (2011). All together now!: Integrating virtual reference in the academic library. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 50. 280-292
  • Drucker, P.. (2002). La Gerencia: tareas, responsabilidades y prácticas. El Ateneo. Buenos Aires.
  • (1999). The european higher education area. Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education convened in Bologna, 19 June 1999.
  • Evans, E. R.. (2011). An investigation into the extent and application of bilingual signage in New Zealand public libraries. Unpublished School of Information Management, Victoria University of Wellington. Wellington.
  • Evans, G. E., Layzell Ward, P.. (2003). Beyond the basic: The management guide to library and information professionals. Neal-Schuman. New York.
  • Evans, M. F., Thomas, S.. (2007). Implementation of an integrated information management system at the National Library of Wales: A case study. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems. 41. 325-337
  • Fagan, J. C.. (2009). Web project management for academic libraries. Chandos. Oxford.
  • Fenton, C.. (2007). Finding the way: Improving access to the collections of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems. 41. 353-364
  • Gongla, P., Rizzuto, C.. (2001). Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience. IBM Systems Journal. 40. 842-862
  • Greene, J.. (2010). Project management and institutional repositories: A case study at University College Dublin Library. New Review of Academic Librarianship. 16. 98-115
  • Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., Clark, T.. (2006). Withing and beyond communities of practice: making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies. 43. 641
  • Hansen, M. T., Birkinshaw, J.. (2007). La cadena de valor en la innovación. Harvard Business Review. 85. 100-110
  • Hayman, L. M.. (1997). Database design for preservation project management: The California Newspaper Project. Library Resources and Technical Services. 41. 236-253
  • Henshaw, C.. (2011). The Wellcome Digital Library: Building a sustainable infrastructure. Library Hi Tech News. 28. 18-21
  • Holley, R.. (2004). Developing a digitisation framework for your organisation. Electronic Library. 22. 518-522
  • Holly, M. L.. (2004). Learning in Community: Small Group Leadership for Educational Change. Educar. 113-130
  • Hull, R. W., Dreher, S. L.. (2001). 'Into the middle of the thing' (with apologies to Horace): Developing a system to manage a grant-funded digital collection project. Collection Management. 26. 29-38
  • Koontz, C. M., Jue, D. K., McClure, C. R., Bertot, J. C.. (2004). The Public Library Geographic Database: What can it do for your library?. Public Libraries. 43. 113-118
  • Koontz, H., O'Donnell, K.. (1972). Principles of Management. McGraw-Hill. New York.
  • Koontz, H.. (1994). Administración: Una perspectiva global. McGraw-Hill. México.
  • Lesser, E., Everest, K.. (2001). Using communities of practice to manage intellectual capital. Ivey Business Journal. 37-41
  • Lesser, E., Starck, J.. (2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal. 40. 831-841
  • Levi, P.. (2010). Digitising the past: The beginning of a new future at the Royal Tropical Institute of the Netherlands. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems. 44. 39-47
  • Lewis, A. C.. (1995). The use of PRINCE project management methodology in choosing a new library system at the University of Wales Bangor. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems. 29. 231-240
  • Londhe, N. L., Desale, S. K., Patil, S. K.. (2011). Development of a digital library of manuscripts: A case study at the University of Pune, India. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems. 45. 135-148
  • Lynch, B. P.. (1985). Management strategies for libraries: A basic reader. Neal-Schuman. New York.
  • MacLachlan, L.. (1996). Making project management work for you. Library Association.
  • Martey, A. K.. (2002). Management issues in library networking: Focus on a pilot library networking project in Ghana. Library Management. 23. 239-252
  • McClure, C. R.. (1982). Strategies for library administration: Concepts and approaches. Libraries Unlimited. Littleton^eColorado Colorado.
  • Medawar, K.. (2007). The restructuring of the portal at the Institut Pasteur Library: A case study. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems. 41. 20-34
  • Middleton, M. R.. (1999). Library digitisation project management. 20th IATUL (International Association of Technological University Libraries) Conference. 1-7
  • Moore, K.. (1998). Project management: Can libraries benefit?. Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana. 20. 72-73
  • Müller, H., Maurer, H.. (2011). Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Online Books, Complementary Social Media and Crowdsourcing. ACM. New York.
  • Murphy, E.. (2008). Delivering core text material electronically: A project management perspective. SCONUL Focus. 29-32
  • Otunla, A. O., Akanmu-Adeyemo, E. A.. (2010). Library automation in Nigeria: The Bowen University experience. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science. 20. 93-102
  • Pacios, A. R.. (1997). La administración de las unidades de información: una aproximación a su concepto y evolución. Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información. 20. 225-248
  • Palincsar, A., Herrenkohl, L.. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory into Practice. 41. 26-32
  • Pan, S., Leidner, D.. (2003). Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing. Journal of Strategic Information System. 12. 71-88
  • Piorun, M., Palmer, L. A.. (2008). Digitizing dissertations for an institutional repository: A process and cost analysis. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 96. 223-229
  • Prytherch, R.. (1994). Information management and library science: A guide to the literature. Gower. Aldershot.
  • Ramos, L. F.. (1995). Dirección, administración y marketing de empresas e instituciones documentales. Síntesis. Madrid.
  • Ramos, L. F.. (2003). Introducción a la administración de información. Síntesis. Madrid.
  • Roberts, J.. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies. 43. 623-639
  • Rosacker, K. M.. (2010). Information technology project management within public sector organization. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 23. 587-594
  • Roselló, D.. (2006). Gestión de proyectos culturales: Análisis de casos. Ariel. Barcelona.
  • Saikia, R. R., Kalita, B.. (2011). 8th International CALIBER. Goa University.
  • Sakaguchi, E., Shimada, K., Wasserstrom, A.. (2010). A cross-Pacific partnership: The University of Maryland Libraries and the National Diet Library of Japan jointly reformat children's books. OCLC Systems & Services. 26. 18-28
  • Sharpe, P. A., Vacek, R. E.. (2010). Intranet 2.0 from a project management perspective. Journal of Web Librarianship. 4. 239-249
  • Stephenson, W. R.. (1991). Seminar on project management for libraries/documentalists. Guyana Library Association Bulletin. 20. 46-52
  • Stueart, R. D., Moran, B. B.. (2002). Library and information center management. Libraries Unlimited.
  • Train, B., Elkin, J.. (2001). Effecting change: Reader development projects in public libraries. Library Management. 22. 395-403
  • (2002). Universidad Complutense de Madrid: de la Edad Media al III Milenio. Editorial Complutense. Madrid.
  • (2011). Convocatoria de proyectos de innovación y mejora de la calidad docente.
  • (2013). Universidad Complutense de Madrid: web oficial.
  • Vásquez, S.. (2011). Comunidades de práctica. Educar. 47. 51-68
  • Wagner, P.. (2006). The three skills you need to have for successful project management. Information Outlook. 10. 24-26
  • Webb, Sylvia. (2001). Project management in library and information services. Information Management Report. 16-19
  • Wenger, E.. (1998). Communities of practices: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Wenger, E., Lave, J.. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Winston, M. D., Hoffman, T.. (2005). Project management in libraries. Journal of Library Administration. 42. 51-61