Estudiantes mejor informadosmejores resultados académicos

  1. María-del-Pilar Sánchez-Martín 1
  2. David Pascual-Ezama 2
  3. María Luisa Delgado-Jalón 3
  1. 1 Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
    info

    Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ha64j07

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  3. 3 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
    info

    Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01v5cv687

Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Revista de contabilidad = Spanish accounting review: [RC-SAR]

ISSN: 1138-4891

Année de publication: 2017

Volumen: 20

Número: 1

Pages: 47-54

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.RCSAR.2016.03.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de contabilidad = Spanish accounting review: [RC-SAR]

Résumé

The present research shows how the information provided to students about the evaluation process influences their academic performance. We ran an experiment with 3 intrasubject conditions in which different information was available by 377 students. Results show that providing information to students implies that they make a greater effort in the active seminars. Finally, we found interesting results regarding the students preferences about the seminars final grading.

Références bibliographiques

  • Bridges, P., Cooper, A., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Scurry, D., et al. Course marks high, examination marks low: Discuss. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (2002), 35–48.
  • Cano, I., Chamizo, J., Valiente, C., Los resultados de aprendizaje como indicador de mejora continua y herramienta de gobernanza. Los estudios de Contabilidad y Finanzas en la London South Bank University (Reino Unido). Revista de Formación e Innovación Educativa Universitaria 7:1 (2014), 59–74.
  • Dalziel, J., Using marks to assess student performance: Some problems and alternatives. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 23 (1998), 351–366.
  • Fletcher, R.B., Meyer, L.H., Anderson, H., Johnston, P., Rees, M., Faculty and students conceptions of assessment in higher education. Higher Education 64 (2012), 119–133.
  • Furnham, A., Batey, M., Martin, N., How would you like to be evaluated? The correlates of students’ preferences for assessment methods. Personality and Individual Differences 50 (2011), 259–263.
  • García, M.V., Alvarado, J.M., Jiménez, A., La predicción del rendimiento académico: Regresión lineal versus regresión logística. Psicothema 12:2 (2000), 248–252.
  • Garside, J., Nhemachena, J.Z., Williams, J., Topping, A., Repositioning assessment: Giving students the ‘choice’ of assessment methods. Nurse Education in Practice 9 (2009), 141–148.
  • Gibbs, G., Simpson, C., Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1 (2004), 3–30.
  • Gil-Gómez de Liaño, B., León, O., Pascual-Ezama, D., Research participation improves student's exam performance. Spanish Journal of Psychology 15:2 (2012), 544–550.
  • Hand, L., Sanderson, P., O'Neil, M., Fostering deep and active learning through assessment. Accounting Education 5:1 (1996), 103–119.
  • House, J.D., Hurst, R.S., Keely, E.J., Relacionship between learner attitudes, prior achievement, and performance in a general education course: A multi-institutional study. International Journal of Instructional Media 23 (1996), 257–271.
  • Jareño, F., López, R., Actividades de evaluación continua - correlación con la calificación de la prueba final y efecto sobre la calificación final. Evidencia en Administración y Dirección de Empresas. Revista Complutense de Educación 26:2 (2015), 241–254.
  • Lord, B.R., Robertson, J., Students’ experiences of learning in a third-year management accounting class: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting Education: An International Journal 15:1 (2006), 41–59.
  • Muldoon, R., Is it time to ditch the traditional university exam?. Higher Education Research & Development 31 (2012), 263–265.
  • Murdan, S., Exploring relationships between coursework and examination marks: A study from one school of pharmacy. Pharmacy Education 5 (2005), 97–104.
  • Murphy, R., Evaluating new priorities for assessment in higher education. Bryan, C., Clegg, K., (eds.) Innovative assessment in higher education., 2006, Routledge, Nueva York.
  • Pascual-Ezama, D., Camacho-Miñano, M.M., Urquia Grande, E., Müller, A., ¿Son los nuevos criterios de evaluación en el marco del EEES adecuados para valorar el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes? Experiencia en Contabilidad Financiera. [Are the new assessment criteria appropriate to evaluate students’ academic achievement? An experience from financial accounting]. Revista Educade 2 (2011), 67–83.
  • Payne, E., Brown, G., Communication and practice with examination criteria. Does this influence performance in examinations?. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2011), 619–626.
  • Rodríguez-Izquierdo, R.M., Modelo formativo en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior: Valoraciones de los estudiantes. Aula Abierta 42 (2014), 106–113.
  • San Martín, S., Jiménez, N., Jerónimo, E., La evaluación del alumnado universitario en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Aula Abierta 44:1 (2016), 7–14.
  • Simonite, V., The impact of coursework on degree classifications and the performance of individual students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28:5 (2003), 459–470.
  • Smith, C., Examinations and the ESL student – more evidence of particular disadvantages. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2011), 13–25.
  • Tian, X., Do assessment methods matter? A sensitivity test. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (2007), 387–401.
  • Tovia, F. y Liu, Y. (2007). Students evaluating significant factors on retention: A statistical analysis. International Conference on Engineering Education - ICEE, 3-7 Sep, Coimbra (Portugal) [consultado 3-7 Sep 2007]. Disponible en http://icee2007.dei.uc.pt/proceedings/papers/123.pdf.
  • Vallès, A., Girona, V., Nonell, R., Parcerisa, A., Ortín, J., Abadal, E., et al. Buenas prácticas de evaluación continuada en 7 titulaciones universitarias. Revista del CIDUI Congrés Internacional de Docència Universitària i Innovació 2 (2014), 1–14.
  • Villardón, L. y Yániz, C. (2004). El aprendizaje cooperativo y el nuevo concepto de evaluación, Cuartas Jornadas sobre Aprendizaje Cooperativo del Grupo GIAC, 4 Jul 2004, Tarragona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
  • Wilson, R.L., Hardgrave, B.C., Predicting graduate student success in an MBA program: Regression versus classification. Educational and Psychological Measurement 55 (1995), 186–195.
  • Yorke, M., How finely grained does summative assessment need to be?. Studies in Higher Education 35 (2010), 677–689.
  • Yorke, M., Summative assessment: Dealing with the ‘measurement fallacy’. Studies in Higher Education 36 (2011), 251–273.
La source de données: Dialnet