The Metamorphosis of the Myth of AlchemyMary Shelley’s Frankenstein

  1. Azcárate, Asunción López-Varela 1
  2. Saavedra, Estefanía 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Aldizkaria:
Icono14

ISSN: 1697-8293

Argitalpen urtea: 2017

Zenbakien izenburua: Technopoïesis: la mitologización transmedia y la unidad del conocimiento

Alea: 15

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 108-127

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.7195/RI14.V15I1.1036 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Icono14

Laburpena

This article takes as starting point the myth of alchemy in Mary Shelley´s Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus, often interpreted as a warning of the risks and dangers of science and technology demonized in the form of the creature. Set in the Romantic period, the paper argues that the novel stages an ambiguous relationship between the advances in natural science and the philosophical and spiritual concerns that Mary Shelley inherited from her father, the philosopher William Godwin, which she discussed with her husband, the poet Percy B. Shelley. In the context of contemporary interdisciplinary discourses that contemplate ‘consilience’ between the humanities and the sciences, this paper offers a reading of Frankenstein and of Percy B. Shelley’s essay “A Defence of Poetry” as critical of empirical science in their ambiguous positioning with regards to alchemy and contemporary science. Furthermore, the research seeks to establish links with eco-cybernetic theories which bring to the fore a renewed interest on humanistic aspects.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Adorno, Theodor. (2002). The Stars Down to Earth and other essays on the irrational in culture. Introd. By Stephen Crook. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Bacon Roger. (1985). The root of the world: forty seven step to the Philosopher´s Stone. U.S.A: The Alchemical Press.
  • Bianchi, Luigi Massimo. (1994) “The Visible and the Invisible. From Alchemy to Paracelsus” in Alchemy and Chemistry in the 16th and 17th Centuries. Rattansi Piyo and Clericuzio eds. Klumer Academis Publisher. Netherlands.
  • Bulhof, Ilse Nina, (1992). The language of science: A study of the relationship between literature and science in the perspective of a hermeneutical ontology. New York & Leiden: E.J. Brill.
  • Brailsford, H.N. Shelley (1913). Godwin and Their Circle. London : Oxford University Press.
  • Castle, Terry. (1995) The Female Thermometer: Eighteenth-century Culture and the Invention of the Uncanny. New York and London.
  • Cho, Joanne Miyang, Kurlander, Eric, and McGetchin, Douglas T. (2014). Transcultural Encounters between Germany and India: Kindred Spirits in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Clericuzio Antonio. (1994). “The internal laboratory. The chemical Reinterpretation of Medical spirits in England (1650-1680)” in Alchemy and Chemistry in the 16th and 17th Centuries. Rattansi Piyo and Clericuzio eds. Klumer Academis Publisher. Netherlands. 1994, 51-85
  • Davy, Sir Humphry. (1812). Elements of Chemical Philosophy. London: Johnson and Co.
  • Ebeling, Elizabeth. (1935). “A Probable Paracelsian Element in Shelley.” University of North Carolina Press: Studies in Philology, 32.3 (1935): 508-525 http://www.jstor.org/stable/4172289
  • Eliade, Mircea (1978). The Forge and Crucible: The Origins and Structures of Alchemy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ellis, Markman. (1999). “Fictions of Science in Mary Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’” Sydney’s Studies in English 25. http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/SSE/article/view/537
  • Godwin, William. Diary 1788-1836. http://godwindiary.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/index2.html
  • List of books read. http://godwindiary.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/bibl/
  • Greshko, Michael. (2016) “Isaac Newton's Lost Alchemy Recipe Rediscovered” National Geographic on April 4th 2016 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/04/160404-isaac-newton-alchemy-mercury-recipe-chemistry-science/
  • Harpur, Patrick. (2002). The Philosopher’s Secret Fire: A History of the Imagination. London: Penguin.
  • Hawkins, Desmond. (1995). The Grove Diaries: The Rise and Fall of an English Family, 1809-1925. New Jersey: The Dovecot Press.
  • Hughes Jonathan. (2012). The Rise of Alchemy in Fourteenth-Century England: Plantagenet Kings and the Search for the Philosopher´s Stone. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. London.
  • Jacob, Margaret. (1981). The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans. London: George Allen & Unwin.
  • Lawrence M. Principe, (2007) Ed. Chymists and Chymistry: Studies in the History of Alchemy and Early Modern Chemistry. Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation. Sagamore Beach, Mass.: Science History Publications.
  • Murray J. Christopher (2004) Ed. Encyclopedia of the Romantic Era, 1760-1850. Vol. I. London: Taylor & Francis Books, Inc.
  • LópezVarela, Asunción. (2015a). "Intermedialidad y metamorfosis: de analogías, simetrías, bucles y Orbis Tertius.” En Nuevos dispositivos enunciativos en la era intermedial. Amélie Florenchie and Dominique Breton (Eds.) Villeurbanne, France: Éditions Orbis Tertius, 63-85.
  • López-Varela Azcárate, Asunción. (2015b) “El futuro de las narratologías híbridas en Alicia en el país de las maravillas.” 1616. Anuario de literatura comparada, 5 (2015b): 137-162. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
  • López-Varela Azcárate, Asunción. (2016). "El futuro de las narratologías híbridas II: A través del espejo de Lewis Carroll". En Justo, Susana y Laura Pereira (eds.). Espacios transliterarios: hibridez, digitalidad, migración. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: Santiago de Compostela, 2016. 10-45.
  • Mellor, Anne Kostelanetz. (1988). Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. Methuen.
  • Moran, Bruce T. (2005). Distilling Knowledge: Alchemy, Chemistry, and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Nummedal, Tara. (2007). Alchemy and Authority in the Holy Roman Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Owen, Alex. (2004). The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Place of the Modern, University of Chicago Press.
  • Robinson, Charles E. (1996). The Frankenstein Notebooks. Garland.
  • Robinson, Charles E. (2009) The Original Frankenstein. Bodleian Library 2008. Random House Vintage Paperback.
  • Saavedra, Estefanía. (2013) Radix Mundi: Alquimia, mística y semiótica en un texto de Roger Bacon. Master Thesis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Simmel, Georg (1906). “The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies,” trans. Albion Small, The American Journal of Sociology, XI.4 (1906): 441-98.
  • Scrivener, Michael Henry. (1982) Radical Shelley: The Philosophical Anarchism and Utopian Thought of Percy Bysshe Shelley. New Jersey. Princeton University Press.
  • Shelley Mary. (1818) Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Internet Archive. https://archive.org/stream/Frankenstein1818Edition/frank-a5_djvu.txt
  • Shelley Mary. (1831) Frankenstein. Second Norton Critical Edition. Edited by Paul Hunter.
  • Shelley, Percy B. (1897). Letters to Thomas Jefferson Hogg. https://archive.org/details/lettersfrompercy00shelrich
  • Shelley, Percy B. (1820). The Complete Poetical Works, by Percy Bysshe Shelley: Volume 25. Oxford Edition 1914, edited by Thomas Hutchinson. https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/shelley/percy_bysshe/s54cp/volume25.html
  • Shelley, Percy B. “A Defence of Poetry” in Essays, Letters from Abroad, Translations and Fragments. London: Moxon. http://archive.org/stream/essayslettersfro01shelrich#page/n35/mode/2up
  • Frederick, Norman (1944) (Ed.) The Letters of Mary W. Shelley. University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Mary Shelley' s Journal. Ed. Frederick L. Jones University of Oklahoma Press, 1947
  • Smiles, Samuel. (1891). A Publisher and His Friends. Memoirs and Correspondence of the Late John Murray. London: J. Murray.
  • Thoman, Charles J. (1998). “Sir Humphry Davy and Frankenstein.” Chemical Education 75.4 (1998): 495. DOI: 10.1021/ed075p495
  • Yousef, Nancy. (2002) “The Monster in the Dark Room: Frankenstein, Feminism and Philosophy.” MLQ: Modern Language Quarterly 63.2 (June 2002): 197-226
  • Weber, Max. (1919) Wissenchaft als Beruf. München und Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.
  • Welburn, Andrew J & Heinzen, Thomas (1986). Power and Self-Consciousness in the Poetry of Shelley. London: MacMillan.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet