Estudio de las "bellas durmientes" desde la perspectiva del solucionismo

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abrizah, Abdullah; Thelwall, Mike (2014). “Can the impact of non-Western academic books be measured? An investigation of Google Books and Google Scholar for Malaysia”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 12, pp. 2498-2508. https://goo.gl/zsLVuE https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23145
• Bateson, William (1909). Mendel’s principles of heredity. Cambridge: University Press; New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons. https://archive.org/details/mendelsprinciple00bate
• Belter, Christopher W. (2015). “Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits”. Journal of the Medical Library Association, v. 103, n. 4, pp. 219-221. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4613388/ https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.014.
• Bornmann, Lutz (2015). “Letter to the editor: On the conceptualisation and theorisation of the impact caused by publications”. Scientometrics, v. 103, n. 3, pp. 1145-1148, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1588-4
• Bornmann, Lutz; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2008). “What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviour”. Journal of documentation, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 45-80. http://www.eerqi.eu/sites/default/files/BornmannLutzCitingBehavior. pdf https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
• Bornmann, Lutz; Leydesdorff, Loet (2014). “Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: Bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research”. EMBO reports, v. 15, n. 12, pp. 1228-1232. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439608
• Bornmann, Lutz; Marx, Werner (2014). “How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations”. Scientometrics, v. 98, n. 1, pp. 487-509. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.3697.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1161-y
• Burrell, Quentin (2005). “Are ‘sleeping beauties’ to be expected?”. Scientometrics, v. 65, n. 3, pp. 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0280-5
• Cabello-Fernández-Delgado, Florencio; Rascón-Gómez, María-Teresa (2015). “The index and the moon: Mortgaging scientific evaluation”. International journal of communication, v. 9, pp. 1880-1887. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3629
• Campanario, Juan-Miguel (1996). “Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 47, n. 4, pp. 302-310. https://goo.gl/ZXa3hj https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199604)47:4<302::AIDASI6>3.0.CO;2-0
• Campanario, Juan-Miguel (2009). “Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: accounts by Nobel laureates”. Scientometrics, v. 81, n. 2, pp. 549-565. https://goo.gl/X9AL9G https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2141-5
• Casadevall, Arturo; Fang, Ferric (2012). “Reforming science: Methodological and cultural reforms”. Infection and immunity, v. 80, n. 3, pp. 891-896. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.06183-11
• Costas, Rodrigo; Van-Leeuwen, Thed; Bordons, María (2010a). “A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 8, pp. 1564-1581. https://goo.gl/QLyulZ https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21348
• Costas, Rodrigo; Van-Leeuwen, Thed; Van-Raan, Anthony (2010b). “Is scientific literature subject to a ‘sell-by-date’? A general methodology to analyze the ‘durability’of scientific documents”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 8, pp. 329-339. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0907.1455.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21244
• Costas, Rodrigo; Van-Leeuwen, Thed; Van-Raan, Anthony (2011). “The ‘Mendel syndrome’ in science: durability of scientific literature and its effects on bibliometric analysis of individual scientists”. Scientometrics, v. 89, n. 1, pp. 177205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0436-4
• Costas, Rodrigo; Zahedi, Zohreh; Wouters, Paul (2015). “Do ‘altmetrics’ correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 10, pp. 20032019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4321 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309
• DePellegrin, Tracey; Johnston, Mark (2015). “An arbitrary line in the sand: Rising scientists confront the impact factor”. Genetics, v. 201, n. 3, pp. 811-813. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.182261
• Egghe, Leo; Guns, Raf; Rousseau, Ronald (2011). “Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 62, n. 8, pp. 1637-1644. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21557
• Fanelli, Daniele (2010). “Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data”. PLoS one, v. 5, n. 4, pp. e10271 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271
• Fanelli, Daniele (2012). “Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries”. Scientometrics, v. 90, n. 3, pp. 891-904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7
• Fanelli, Daniele; Costas, Rodrigo; Larivière, Vincent (2015). “Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity”. PLoS one, v. 10, n. 6, e0127556, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556
• Fisher, Ronald A. (1936). “Has Mendel’s work been rediscovered?”. Annals of science, v. 1, n. 2, pp. 115-137. https ://heky l l . ser v ices .adela ide.edu.au/dspace/ bitstream/2440/15123/1/144.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/00033793600200111
• Floridi, Luciano (2011). “A defence of constructionism: Philosophy as conceptual engineering”. Metaphilosophy, v. 42, n. 3, pp. 282-304. http://www.philosophyofinformation.net/wp-content/ uploads/sites/67/2014/05/adofpace.pdf https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01693.x
• Floridi, Luciano (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. OUP Oxford. ISBN: 978 0199606726
• Garfield, Eugene (1970). “Would Mendel’s work have been ignored if the Science Citation Index was available 100 years ago?”. Current contents, v. 2, pp. 69-70. htt p : / / w w w. g a r f i e l d . l i b r a r y. u p e n n . e d u /e s s a y s / V1p069y1962-73.pdf
• Garfield, Eugene (1980). “Premature discovery or delayed recognition-why”. Current contents, v. 21, pp. 5-10. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v4p488y1979-80.pdf
• Garfield, Eugene (1997). “A statistically valid definition of bias is needed to determine whether the Science Citation Index discriminates against Third World journals”. Current science, v. 73, n. 8, pp. 639-641. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/currscience. html
• Garfield, Eugene (2006). “The history and meaning of the journal impact factor”. Jama, v. 295, n. 1, pp. 90-93. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jamajif2006.pdf
• Glänzel, Wolfgang; Schlemmer, Balázs; Thijs, Bart (2003). “Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon”. Scientometrics, v. 58, n. 3, pp. 571-586. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/31710/2/ Scientometrics_58_3_571.pdf https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006881.30700.ea
• Gross, Alan; Harmon, Joseph; Reidy, Michael (2002). Communicating science: the scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN: 978 0195134544
• Hirsch, Jorge (2005). “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output”. En: Procs of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 102, n. 46, pp. 16569-16572. https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0508025.pdf
• Howitt, Susan; Wilson, Anna (2014). “Revisiting ‘Is the scientific paper a fraud?’: The way textbooks and scientific research articles are being used to teach undergraduate students could convey a misleading image of scientific research”. EMBO reports, v. 15, n. 5, pp. 481-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/embr.201338302
• Huang, Tien-Chi; Hsu, Chieh; Ciou, Zih-Jin (2015). “Systematic methodology for excavating sleeping beauty publications and their princes from medical and biological engineering studies”. Journal of medical and biological engineering, v. 35, n. 6, pp. 749-758. https://goo.gl/Mlv0kz https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-015-0091-y
• Ibáñez, Alfonso; Larrañaga, Pedro; Bielza, Concha (2013). “Cluster methods for assessing research performance: exploring Spanish computer science”. Scientometrics, v. 97, n. 3, pp. 571-600. https://goo.gl/rU0Trn https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0985-9
• Illich, Ivan (1975). Nemesis médica: la expropiación de la salud. 1a ed. Barcelona: Barral (Breve biblioteca de respuesta). ISBN: 978 8421103302 http://www.ivanillich.org.mx/Nemesis.pdf
• Illich, Ivan (1985a). Energía y equidad: Desempleo creador. México, D.F.: Joaquín Mortiz. ISBN: 9684330111 http://www.ivanillich.org.mx/LiEnergia.htm#anchor861801
• Illich, Ivan (1985b). La sociedad desescolarizada. México, D.F.: Joaquín Moritz. ISBN: 9682704901 http://www.ivanillich.org.mx/libros.htm
• Ke, Qing; Ferrara, Emilio; Radicchi, Filippo; Flammini, Alessandro (2015). “Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science”. En: Procs of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 112, n. 24, pp. 7426-7431. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7426.full.pdf https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424329112
• Kemman, Max (2015). “Standing on the shoulders of the Google giant: Sustainable discovery and Google Scholar’s comprehensive coverage”. The London School of Economics and Political Science. The impact blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/11/19/ standing-on-the-shoulders-of-the-google-giant
• Kuhn, Thomas S. (2007). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica. ISBN: 978 9681675998
• Lamo-de-Espinosa, Emilio; González-García, José-María; Torres-Albero, Cristóbal (2002). La sociología del conocimiento y de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza. ISBN: 978 8420681474
• Latour, Bruno (2010). “An attempt at a ‘Compositionist manifesto’”. New literary history, v. 41, n. 3, pp. 471-490. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/120-NLHfinalpdf.pdf
• Leydesdorff, Loet; Wagner, Caroline; Bornmann, Lutz (2016). “Replicability and the public/private divide”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 7, pp. 1777-1778 http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.08798 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23672
• Li, Jiang; Shi, Dongbo; Zhao, Star X.; Ye, Fred (2014). “A study of the ‘heartbeat spectra’ for ‘sleeping beauties’”. Journal of informetrics, v. 8, n. 3, pp. 493-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.002
• Li, Jiang; Ye, Fred (2012). “The phenomenon of all-elementssleeping-beauties in scientific literature”. Scientometrics, v. 92, n. 3, pp. 795-799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0643-7
• Li, Shen; Yu, Guang; Zhang, Xue; Zhang, Wan-Feng (2014). “Identifying princes of sleeping beauty-knowledge mapping in discovering princes”. En: 2014 Intl conf on management science & engineering (Icmse), pp. 912-918. http://toc.proceedings.com/24022webtoc.pdf http://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2014.6930325
• MacRoberts, Michael; MacRoberts, Barbara (1996). “Problems of citation analysis”. Scientometrics, v. 36, n. 3, pp. 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129604
• Martin, Ben (2013). “Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment”. Research policy, v. 42, n. 5, pp. 1005-1014. https://goo.gl/QXZJdn https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.011
• Medawar, Peter (1964). “Is the scientific paper a fraud?”. Experiment: A series of scientific case histories first broadcast in the BBC Third Programme. London: British Broadcasting Corporation S., pp. 7-13. http://www.weizmann.ac.il/mcb/UriAlon/sites/mcb.UriAlon/ files/uploads/medawar.pdf
• Merton, Robert (1968). “The Matthew effect in science”. Science, v. 159, n. 3810, pp. 56-63. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/merton/matthew1.pdf
• Merton, Robert (1977). La sociología de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
• Mingers, John; Leydesdorff, Loet (2015). “A review of theory and practice in scientometrics”. European journal of operational research, v. 246, n. 1, pp. 1-19. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.05462.pdf http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002
• Morozov, Evgeny (2015). La locura del solucionismo tecnológico. Móstoles, Madrid; Buenos Aires: Clave Intelectual; Katz. ISBN: 978 8415917199
• Moustafa, Khaled (2015). “The disaster of the impact factor”. Science and engineering ethics, v. 21, n. 1, pp. 139-142. http://philpapers.org/archive/MOUTDO-2.pdf http://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9517-0
• Petersen, Alexander-Michael; Fortunato, Santo; Pan, Raj; Kaski, Kimmo; Penner, Orion; Rungi, Armando; Riccaboni, Massimo; Stanley, H. Eugene; Pammolli, Fabio (2014). “Reputation and impact in academic careers”. En: Procs of the National Academy of Science, v. 111, n. 43, pp. 15316-15321. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323111111
• Price, Derek-De-Solla (1951). “Quantitative measures of the development of science”. Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, v. 4, n. 14, pp. 85-93. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/price/pricequantitativemeasures1951. pdf
• Price, Derek-De-Solla (1976). “A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 27, n. 5-6, pp. 292-306. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/price/pricetheory1976.pdf https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fasi.4630270505
• Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
• Prins, Ad A. M.; Costas, Rodrigo; Van-Leeuwen, Thed; Wouters, Paul (2016). “Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data”. Research evaluation, S. rvv049. http://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv049
• Sangwal, Keshra (2012). “On the relationship between citations of publication output and Hirsch index h of authors: conceptualization of tapered Hirsch index hT, circular citation area radius R and citation acceleration a”. Scientometrics, v. 93, n. 3, pp. 987-1004. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0805-7
• Sugimoto, Cassidy (2015). “Attention is not impact’ and other challenges for altmetrics”. Wiley exchanges, June 24. https://hub.wiley.com/community/exchanges/discover/ blog/2015/06/23/attention-is-not-impact-and-otherchallenges-for-altmetrics
• Tagholm, Roger (2014). “Publish or perish? Now it’s publish, share, track or perish”. Publishing perspectives, March 27. http://publishingperspectives.com/2014/03/publish-orperish-now-its-publish-share-track-or-perish
• Tandon, Pramod (2015). “Impact sans impact factor”. National Academy Science letters, v. 38, n. 6, pp. 521-527. https://goo.gl/SpSEnm http://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-015-0419-8
• The PLoS Medicine editors (2006). “The impact factor game”. PLoS medicine, v. 3, n. 6, e291. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
• Van-Calster, Ben (2012). “It takes time: A remarkable example of delayed recognition”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 11, pp. 2341-2344. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22732
• Van-Raan, Anthony (2004). “Sleeping beauties in science”. Scientometrics, v. 59, n. 3, pp. 467-472. http://www.cwts.nl/tvr/documents/avr-slbeau-scientom.pdf https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018543.82441.f1
• Van-Raan, Anthony (2015). “Dormitory of physical and engineering sciences: sleeping beauties may be sleeping innovations. Part 1: Basic properties, cognitive environment, characteristics of the princes”. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01540v1
• Waltman, Ludo (2016). “A review of the literature on citation impact indicators”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 365-391. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02099 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
• Wang, Juncheng; Ma, Feicheng; Chen, Minjie (2012). “Why and how can ‘sleeping beauties’ be awakened?”. The electronic library, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211204033
• Wouters, Paul; Costas, Rodrigo (2012). Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. SURFfoundation Utrecht. http://research-acumen.eu/wp-content/uploads/Usersnarcissism-and-control.pdf
• Wouters, Paul; Leydesdorff, Loet (1994). “Has Price’s dream come true: Is scientometrics a hard science?”. Scientometrics, v. 31, n. 2, pp. 193-222. https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/files/605683/16633_294_wouters.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018560