Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria en los pacientes oncológicos

  1. Carmina Wanden-Berghe 1
  2. Cristina Cuerda Compes 2
  3. Julia Álvarez Hernandez 3
  4. José Luis Pereira Cunill 4
  5. Fátima Carabaña Pérez 5
  6. Carmen Gómez Candela 6
  1. 1 Hospital General Universitario e ISABIAL-FISABIO, Alicante, España.
  2. 2 Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
    info

    Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0111es613

  3. 3 Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, España.
  4. 4 Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España.
  5. 5 Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España.
  6. 6 Hospital La Paz, Madrid, España
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Hospital a Domicilio

ISSN: 2530-5115

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 1

Número: 2

Páginas: 65-72

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.22585/HOSPDOMIC.V1I2.15 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Hospital a Domicilio

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Objective: to analyze the characteristics of oncology patients with home parenteral nutrition HPD collected from the NADYA registry. Method: cross-sectional study of the data collected from the NADYA’s group registry related to home and outpatient artificial nutrition. Patients with HPD and explicit oncological diagnosis were selected. Data were collected from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2016. Results: Within the 7 years studied, 1463 patients were collected, of which 599 had a cancer diagnosis (40.94%) with an increase of 43% from the beginning. The mean age was 57 years IIQ [46-64], registering 5 children. The majority of the patients were oncologic palliative (51.3%). There were 3.18 septic catheterrelated complications per 1000 days of nutrition, most frequently in the radiation enteritis group (ANOVA p <0.001). The main cause of end of treatment was death 61%, palliative patients in higher proportion than the other diagnoses (x2 = 53,819, p <0.001). Conclusions: palliative represent the majority of cancer patients with HPD. Intestinal obstruction and short bowel syndrome was the main reason for indicating it, almost 80% of cases. Patients with radiation enteritis were the ones with the least metabolic and septic complications not related to the catheter, being the ones with the most septic complications related to the catheter. Quality of life is a parameter that would provide a very valuable information of these patients. It is a limitation of this study not to have data based on this parameter.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Howavd L. Home Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition in Cancer Patients. Cancer. 1993;72(11 Suppl):3531-41. PMID: 8242585
  • Álvarez Hernández J, Muñoz Carmona D, Planas Vila M, Rodríguez Rodríguez I, Sánchez P. Criterios de intervención nutricional: objetivos, indicaciones y evidencias. Nutr Hosp Suplementos. 2008;1(1):26-33.
  • Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):11-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015; PMID: 27637832
  • Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, Gavazzi C, Mariani L. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9292):1487-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06578-3; PMID: 11705560
  • Castelló-Botía I, Wanden-Berghe C, Sanz-Valero J. Artificial nutritional support registries: systematic review. Nutr Hosp. 2009;24(6):711-6. DOI:10.3305/nh.2009.24.6.4556; PMID: 20049375
  • Wanden-Berghe C, Sanz-Valero J, Culebras J; Red MeI-CYTED. Información en Nutrición Domiciliaria: la importancia de los registros. Nutr Hosp. 2008;23(3):220-5. PMID: 185606985
  • Luengo Pérez LM, Guerra Martínez S, Georgescu L.Nutrición enteral domiciliaria prescrita en el Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina de Badajoz (España). Hosp Domic. 2017;1(1):35-45. DOI:10.22585/hospdomic.v1i1.4
  • Wanden-Berghe C, Pérez de la Cruz A, Lobo G, Calleja A, Gómez C, Zugasti A, et al; Grupo NADYA-SENPE. El registro de Nutrición Artificial Domiciliaria y Ambulatoria de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral: análisis DAFO. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27(4):1357-60. DOI: 10.3305/nh.2012.27.4.5912; PMID: 23165586
  • Wanden-Berghe C, Pereira Cunill JL, Cuerda Compes C, Moreno Villares JM, Pérez de la Cruz A, Burgos Peláez R, et al; NADYA-SENPE. Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria en España durante 2014; informe del Grupo de Nutrición Artificial Domiciliaria y Ambulatoria NADYA. Nutr Hosp. 2015;32(6):2380-84. DOI: 10.3305/nh.2015.32.6.10056; PMID: 26667683
  • Bakker H, Bozzetti F, Staun M, Leon-Sanz M, Hebuterne X, Pertkiewicz M, et al. Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey in 1997. Clin Nutr. 1999;18(3):135-40. DOI: 10.1054/clnu.1999.0021; PMID: 10451476
  • Howard L, Ament M, Fleming CR, Shike M, Steiger E: Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1995;109(2):355-65. PMID: 7615183
  • Oz V, Theilla M, Singer P. Eating habits and quality of life of patients receiving home parenteral nutrition in Israel. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(1):95-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.06.016; PMID: 18045751
  • Pironi L, Paganelli F, Mosconi P, Morselli-Labate AM, Spinucci G, Merli C, et al. The SF-36 Instrument for the follow up of health-related quality-of-life assessment of patients undergoing home parenteral nutrition for benign disease. Transplant Proc. 2004;36(2):255-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.12.008; PMID: 15050126
  • Persoon A, Huisman-de Waal G, Naber TA, Schoonhoven L, Tas T, Sauerwein H, et al. Impact of long-term HPN on daily life in adults. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(2):304-13.
  • Carlsson E, Bosaeus I, Nordgren S. Quality of life and concerns in with short bowel syndrome. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(5):445-52. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5614(03)00042-6; PMID: 14512031
  • Dreesen M, Foulon V, Hiele M, Vanhaecht K, De Pourcq L, Pironi L, et al. Quality of care for cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: development of key interventions and outcome indicators using a two-round Delphi approach. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(5):1373-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1679-1; PMID: 23229653
  • Wanden-Berghe C, Campos Martín C, Cuerda Compes C, Gómez Candela C, Burgos Peláez R, Moreno Villares JM; Grupo NADYA-SENPE. Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria en España durante 2015; informe del Grupo de Nutrición Artificial Domiciliaria y Ambulatoria NADYA. Nutr Hosp. 2016;33(6):1487-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.464
  • Hortencio TD, Arendt BM, Teterina A, Jeejeebhoy KN, Gramlich LM, WhittakerJS, et al. Changes in home parenteral nutrition practice based on the Canadian Home Parenteral Nutrition Patient Registry. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015; sep 25. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0148607115609289; PMID: 26407599
  • Winkler MF, DiMaria-Ghalili RA, Guenter P, Resnick HE, Robinson L, LymanB, et al. Characteristics of a cohort of home parenteral nutrition patients at the time of enrollment in the Sustain Registry. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 40(8):1140-49. DOI: 10.1177/0148607115586575; PMID: 25972431
  • Guglielmi FW, Regano N, Mazzuoli S, Rizzi M, Fregnan S, Leogrande G, et al. Catheter-related complications in long-term home parenteral nutrition patients with chronic intestinal failure. J Vasc Access. 2012;13(4):490-7. DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000133; PMID: 23258588
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet