Los fondos soberanos de inversión como instrumentos para economías de inserción externa primario-exportadora

  1. Ramírez-Cendrero, Juan 1
  2. Wirth, Eszter 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Panorama Económico

ISSN: 0122-8900,  2463-0470

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 24

Número: 1

Páginas: 127-142

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.32997/2463-0470-VOL.24-NUM.0-2016-1553 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Panorama Económico

Resumen

Los Fondos Soberanos de Inversión (FSI) son inversores institucionales en manos de Estados que han experimentado un crecimiento sustancial durante los últimos años. Este artículo presenta los FSI prioritariamente como fondos de estabilización, como fondos de ahorro para la equidad intergeneracional y como instrumentos en el marco de estrategias de desarrollo, sobre todo en países dependientes de las materias primas. Este trabajo se complementará con el análisis de dos FSI (Arabia Saudí y Noruega) y sus desafíos en el contexto actual de turbulencias financieras y caída del precio de las materias primas, así como con unas enseñanzas para economías primario-exportadores que puedan impulsar el uso de este instrumento económico.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aissaoui A (2013). Saudi Arabia’s economic diversification: progress in the context of the GCC and challenges. Economic Comment 6(8), Special edicion.
  • Alsweilem, K A (2015). A stable and efficient fiscal framework for Saudi Arabia. Harvard: belfer center for science and international affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Alsweilem KA, Cummine A, Rietveld M, Tweedie K (2015). Sovereign investor models: institutions and policies for managing sovereign wealth. Harvard: Belfer center for science and international affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Avendaño R, Santiso, J (2011). Are sovereign wealth funds politically biased? A comparison with other institutional investors. En Boubakri N, Cosset J C (eds). Institutional investors in global capital markets. Howard House: Emerald Group Publishing, pp 313-353.
  • Balding C (2012). Sovereign wealth funds: The new intersection of money and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bjerkholt O, Nicolescu I (2004). Fiscal rules for economies with non-renewable resources: Norway and Venezuela. En Kopits, G (ed). Rules-dased fiscal policy in emerging markets: Background, analysis and prospects. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 164-179.
  • Bjørnland HC (2012). Utfordringer i penge-og finanspolitikken for en liten åpen råvareproduserende økonomi til Spekter og Norsk Industri. Oslo: BI Norwegian Business School.
  • Capapé J, Guerrero T (2013). More layers than an onion: Looking for a definition of sovereign wealth funds. Medford (MA): The Fletcher School - Tufts University.
  • Castelli M, Scacciavillani F (2012). The new economics of sovereign wealth funds. Nueva York: Wiley Finance.
  • Collier P, van der Ploeg F, Venables A (2009). Managing resource revenues in developing economies. IMF Staff Papers, No. 57: 84–118.
  • Das DK (2009). Sovereign wealth funds: the institutional dimension. International review of economics, 56, No. 1: 85-104.
  • Drezner D (2008). Sovereign wealth funds and the (In) security of global finance. Journal of International Affairs, 62(1): 115-130.
  • Financial Times (2015): Sovereign wealth funds withdraw $19 Bn from asset managers. 6/12/2015.
  • GITFSI (2008). Principios de Santiago. Washington.
  • Hartwick JM (1977). Intergenerational equity and investing rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review, 66: 972-974.
  • Heum P (2008). Local content development-experiences from oil and gas activities in norway. SNF Working Paper No. 02/08. Bergen.
  • Hilaire N, Doucet J (2004). Dutch disease, oil and developing countries. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Alberta.
  • Holden S (2013). Avoiding the resource curse- The Norwegian Case. Energy Policy, 63: 870-876.
  • Hvidt, M. (2013) Economic diversification in GCC countries: Past record and future trends, Londres: London School of Economics.
  • Kern S (2007). Sovereign wealth funds-state investment on the rise. Berlíon: Deutsche Bank Research.
  • Körner K, Masetti O (2015). GCC in times of cheap oil: An opportunity for Economic Reform and Diversification. Berlín: Deutsche Bank Research.
  • Larsen ER (2004). Escaping the resource curse and the dutch disease? Why norway caught up with and forged ahead of its Neighbours. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
  • NBIM (2016): Government pension fund global. Annual Report 2015. Oslo.
  • Olsen Ø (2014). Economic perspectives. Discurso del gobernador de Norges Bank, Oystein Olsen, al consejo supervisor de Norges Bank y a los invitados el 13/02/2014, Norges Bank, Oslo.
  • Parlamento de Noruega (2015). Fiscal policy in an oil economy. Official Norwegian Reports NOU 2015:9, Chapter 1, Oslo.
  • Ramírez-Cendrero JM, Wirth E (2016): Is the norwegian model exportable to combat dutch disease? Resources Policy, 48: 85-96.
  • Rodríguez, C. M. (2006) Dutch disease in Saudi Arabia? Master’s Thesis, Lund University.
  • Ryggvik H (2013). Building a skilled national offshore oil industry. The Norwegian experience. Oslo: The Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO).
  • Santiso J (2008). Sovereign development funds. París: OECD Policy Insight.
  • Setser, B. and Ziemba, R. (2009) GCC sovereign funds. Nueva York: Center for geoeconomic studies, WP 1/2009, Council on Foreign Relations.
  • Telegraph (2015). Oil price rout Will Bring end to era of Saudi Arabian Largesse, Warns Bank of America. 29/12/2015.
  • Thøgersen. Ø. (1994) Economic policy, macroeconomic performance and the norwegian petroleum wealth. A Survey. Bergen: NHH Discussion Paper 21/1994, NHH Norwegian School of Economics.
  • The Economist (2016b). The Saudi Blueprint. 9/01/2016.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet