"De-emplotting" historygenre, vuolence and subversion in Christopher Marlowe's "Edward II"

  1. Rebeca Gualberto Velverde
Revista:
Complutense Journal of English Studies

ISSN: 2386-3935

Año de publicación: 2016

Número: 24

Páginas: 43-59

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Complutense Journal of English Studies

Resumen

Taking into consideration Hayden White’s seminal argument about historical emplotment, and relating such notion to traditional explanations about the ritualistic structure of Tudor historiography, this article reassesses Chistopher Marlowe’s Edward II (ca. 1592) from the perspective of genre in order to expose how the play counter-effects the dominant ideology of the Tudor regime concerning royal authority. The encodation of historical events into the icon of romance, and the dramatic superimposition of tragic conventions upon such an iconic structure arguably confront two opposing modes of representing violence onstage, which determines a theatrical interplay of power discourses that arguably dramatizes the desacralization of kingship through the immanent representation of its sacredness. As this article argues, these dialectics articulates the political anxieties of Renaissance England from within generic categories, and it effectively subverts the well-established strategies of legitimization that idealized (and rewrote) violence, history and monarchy in Tudor England

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Archer, John (1999). Marlowe and the Observation of Men. In Wilson, R., ed., 191-214. Aristotle (1987). The Poetics of Aristotle. Stephen H., trans., ed. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Caroline Press.
  • Barroll, J. Leeds et al, eds. (1975). The Revels History of Drama in English, Volume III, 1576-1613. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.
  • Bianco, Marcie (2007). To Sodomize a Nation: Edward II, Ireland, and the Threat of Penetration. Modern Literary Studies 13.2: n.p.
  • Budra, Paul (2000). A Mirror for Magistrates and the de casibus Tradition. Toronto, Buffalo, London: Toronto University Press.
  • Burke, Peter (1969). The Renaissance Sense of the Past. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Chaucer, Geoffrey (2008). The Riverside Chaucer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Carroll, William C. (2003). Theories of Kingship in Shakespeare’s England. In Dutton, R. and Howard, J. E., eds., 125-145.
  • Cartelli, Thomas (1999). King Edward’s Body. In Wilson, R., 174-190.
  • Crewe, Jonathan (2009). Disorderly Love: Sodomy Revisited in Marlowe’s Edward II. Criticism 51.3: 385-399.
  • Drakakis, J., ed. (1992). Shakesperean Tragedy. London: Longman.
  • Dutton, R. and Howard, J. E., eds. (2003). A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works. Volume II. The Histories. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Edwards, Philip (1983). Threshold of a Nation: A Study in English and Irish Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frye, Northrop (1976). The Secular Scripture. A Study of the Structure of Romance. Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.
  • Greenblatt, Stephen (1980). Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Goy-Blanquet, Dominique (2002). Elizabethan Historiography and Shakespeare’s Sources. In Hattaway, M. ed., 57-70.
  • Habib, Imitiaz (1993). Shakespeare’s Pluralistic Concepts of Character. A Study in Dramatic Anamorphism. Cranbury, London and Mississauga: Associated University Presses.
  • Hattaway, M. ed. (2002). The Cambridge Companion to History Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holderness, Graham (1992). Shakespeare Recycled. The Making of Historical Drama. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Kamps, Ivo (2003). The Writing of History in Shakespeare’s England. In Dutton, R. and Howard, J. E., eds., 3-25.
  • Kantorowicz, Ernst H (1997) (1957). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Kernan, Alvin (1975). The Plays and the Playwrights. In Barroll, J. Leeds et al, eds., 237474.
  • Knowles, Ronald (2002). Shakespeare’s Arguments with History. New York, Palgrave. Levin, Harry (1974). The Overreacher. A Study of Christopher Marlowe. Gloucester, Mass:
  • Peter Smith. Logan, R. A., ed. (2011). Christopher Marlowe. Farnham: Ashgate. Malory, Sir Thomas (1969) (1485). Le Morte D’Arthur, Volumes I, II. London: Penguin
  • Books. Marlowe, Christopher (1994) (1594). Edward II. Ed. Charles Forker. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
  • Moretti, Franco (1992). The Deconsecration of Sovereignity. In Drakakis, J. ed., 46-77 Orgel, Stephen (2011). The Eye of the Beholder. In Logan, R. A., ed., 419-428.
  • Parks, Joan (1999). History, Tragedy, and Truth in Christopher Marlowe’s Edward II. SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 39.2: 275-290.
  • Pearson, Meg F (2009). ‘Die with fame’: Forgiving Infamy in Marlowe’s Edward II. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association 42.2: 97-120.
  • Ribner, Irving (1955). Marlowe’s Edward II and the Tudor History Play. ELH 22.4: 243-253.
  • Rutkoski, Marie (2006). Breeching the Boy in Marlowe's Edward II. SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, 46.2: 281-304
  • Sales, Roger (1991). Christopher Marlowe. Houndmills, Basingstoke, [etc.]: Macmillan Education Ltd.
  • Tillyard, E. M. W (1969). Shakespeare’s History Plays. London: Penguin Books.
  • Thurn, David H (1990). ‘Sovereignty, Disorder, and Fetishism in Marlowe’s Edward II’. Renaissance Drama, 21: 115-141
  • White, Hayden (1978). The Historical Text as Literary Artifact. Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 81-100.
  • Wilson, R., ed. (1999). Christopher Marlowe. London and New York: London.