An integrated computer system for teaching Psychology

  1. Javier González Marqués 1
  2. Carlos Pelta 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revue:
Psicología educativa

ISSN: 1135-755X

Année de publication: 2017

Volumen: 23

Número: 2

Pages: 123-127

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.PSE.2017.05.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Psicología educativa

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

PSICO-A is a computer system for teaching Psychology. It is especially indicated for secondary school students and students in first year of a Psychology degree. It is an innovative system as it is the first integrated computational system designed for teaching educational psychology units. PSICO-A integrates various tools and educational influences: it introduces concept maps, free recovery of memory, an effective mechanism of “feedback”, simulations and digital games and looks into the student's metacognitive abilities. Its computational architecture is modular and integrates an analyzer that helps the teacher to collect data. We have evaluated this system, confirming a significant improvement in a lot of learning variables.

Références bibliographiques

  • Aldrich, C. (2009). Learning online with games, simulations, and virtual worlds. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Alonso, J. I. (2012). Psicología. Bachillerato. Madrid: McGrawHill. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt,
  • Rinehart and Winston. Azevedo, R., Witherspoon, A., Chauncey, A., Burkett, C., & Fike, A. (2009). MetaTutor: A metacognitive tool for enhancing self-regulated learning. In R. Pirrone, R. Azevedo, & G. Biswas (Eds.), Proceedings of the AAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. http://dx.doi.org/995-4214-1-PB.pdf
  • Bai, X., Black, J. B., & Vitale, J. (2007). REAL: Learn with the assistance of a reflective agent. Agent-based systems for human learning conference. Hawaii.
  • Black, J. B. (1992). Types of knowledge representation. CCTE Report Teachers College. New York.: Columbia University.
  • Briggs, G., Shamma, D. A., Cañas, A. J., Carff, R., Scargle, J., & Novak, J. D. (2004). Concept maps applied to Mars exploration public outreach. In A. J. Cañas, J. Novak, & F. González (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on concept mapping. Concept maps: Theory, methodology, and technology (I) (pp. 109–116). Pamplona: UPN.
  • Cañas, A. (2004). CmapTools: a knowledge modelling and sharing environment. Pamplona: UPN. http://dx.doi.org/cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-283.pdf
  • Crespi, L. P. (1945). Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. The American Journal of Psychology, 55, 467–517.
  • Davis, J. M., Leelawong K., Belynne K., Bodenheimer, R., Biswas, T. Vye, N., & Bransford, J. (2003). Intelligent user interface design for teachable agent systems. Proccedings IUI 2003 (pp. 26-33). Miami, FL: ACM Press. http://dx.doi. org/10.1.1.14.8457.pdf
  • de Freitas, S. I. (2006). Using games and simulations for supporting learning. Learning Media and Technology, 31, 343–358.
  • Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Metacognition. London: SAGE. Finke, R. A. (1989). Interpretation of imagery-induced McCollough effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 94–95.
  • Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. (1983). Introduction. In D. Gentner, & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 1–6).
  • Hillsdale, NJ: LEA. González Marqués, J., & Pelta, C. (2013). PSICO-A: a computational system for learning psychology. IJMECS, 5, 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.10.01
  • Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system: an introduction to behavior theory concerning the individual organism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Londres: Routledge.
  • Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772–775. http://dx. doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
  • Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty’s Brain System. IJAIED, 18, 181–208. http://dx.doi.org/ijaied.org/ pub/997 Biswas08.pdf
  • Lerdorf, R., Tatroe, K., & MacIntyre, P. (2006). Programming PHP (2nd ed.). New York: O’Reilly Media.
  • Mayor, J., Suengas, A., & González Marqués, J. (1993). Estrategias metacognitivas Metacognitive strategies. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Novak, J. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca. NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592–604.
La source de données: Dialnet