Aquí no hay química. La difícil relación del profesorado con la tecnología

  1. Mariano Fernández Enguita 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Panorama social

ISSN: 1699-6852

Año de publicación: 2013

Título del ejemplar: Las nuevas tecnologías y su impacto social

Número: 18

Páginas: 145-157

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Panorama social

Resumen

El desarrollo de las nuevas tecnologías está cambiando radicalmente el entorno en que todos, en particular la infancia, la adolescencia y la juventud, se comunican y aprenden, muy distinto del heredado de la imprenta y configurado en torno a la forma de lectura propiciada por esta y adaptada a la escuela. Sin embargo, la institución se mantiene relativamente impermeable a su penetración por la resistencia de la profesión docente, que combina un doble discurso de descalificación del nuevo entorno y aceptación puramente formal, con una aceptación selectiva, al servicio de las prácticas tradicionales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AUTOR, D.H.; L.F. KATZ y M.S. KEARNEY (2006), “Measuring and interpreting trends in economic inequality ­ The polarization of the U.S. labor market”, The American Economic Review, 96 (189).
  • BAUERLEIN, M. (2008), The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future (or, don't trust anyone under 30), Nueva York, Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
  • BLAYA, C. (2003), “Absentéisme des élèves: recherches internationales et politiques de prevention”, presentado en el Observatoire européen de la violence scolaire, Universidad Victor Segalen, Burdeos (http://bit.ly/1guj5Qm, acceso 16/9/13).
  • CARR, N.G. (2008), “Is Google making us stupid?”, The Atlantic, julio­agosto.
  • CARR, N.G. (2010), The shallows: How the Internet is changing the way we think, read and remember, Londres, Atlantic
  • CHRISTENSEN, C.M.; HORN, M.B. y C.W. JOHNSON (2008), Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns, Nueva York, McGraw­Hill.
  • COIRO, J. y E. DOBLER (2007), “Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth–grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet,” Reading Research Quarterly, 42 (2).
  • CUBAN, L. (1986), Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920, Nueva York, Teachers College Press.
  • CUBAN, L. (2001), Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
  • CULL, B. (2011), “Reading revolutions: Online digital text and implications for reading in academe”, First Monday, 16(6) (http://bit. ly/1gul47h, DOI: 10.5210/fm.v16i6.3340, acceso 16/9/13).
  • DUARTE, R.; CAZELLI, S.; PEIXOTO, R. y C.A. COIMBRA (2013), “Computer skills and digital media uses among young students in Rio de Janeiro”, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21: 53 (http:// bit.ly/1gukKp2, acceso 16/9/13).
  • EISENSTEIN, E.L. (1979), The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • ESSIE (2013), The use of ICT in Education: a survey of schools in Europe. Benchmarking acess, use and attitudes to technology in Europe's schools, informe de European Schoolnet / Univer­ sidad de Lieja para la Comisión Europea, ident. SMART­Nr 2010/0039 (http://bit.ly/1gulDhs, DOI: 10.2759/94499, acceso 16/9/13).
  • ETIC-H (2012), Encuesta de Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunica- ción en los Hogares, Madrid, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 2012 (http://bit.ly/11Otdx4. acceso 16/9/13).
  • FÈBVRE, L. y H.J. MARTIN (1958), L'apparition du livre, París, Albin Michell.
  • FERNÁNDEZ ENGUITA, M. (2009), “Cuadernos de quejas”, Revista de libros, 148 (http://bit. ly/1gulSce, acceso 16/9/13).
  • FERNÁNDEZ ENGUITA, M. (2013), “La brecha digital terciaria. El des- fase de la institución escolar ante las desigualdades económicas y en el entorno digital”, comunicación presentada al XI Congreso Español de Sociolo­ gía, GT 13, Madrid (http://bit.ly/1gum2QJ, acceso 16/9/13).
  • FGEE (2013), Barómetro de Hábitos de Lec- tura y Compra de Libros de 2012, Federación de Gremios de Editores en España (http://bit. ly/1e90We2, acceso 16/9/13).
  • FISKE, J. (1989), Understanding popular culture, Boston, Unwin.
  • GALLIE, D. (1991), “Patterns of skill change: Upskilling, deskilling or the polarization of skills?”, Work, Employment & Society, 5: 319­351.
  • GEE, J.P. (2003), “What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy”, Computers in Entertainment, 1(1).
  • GRAY, L.; THOMAS, N.; LEWIS, L. y P. TICE (2010), Teachers' use of educational technology in U.S. public schools, 2009: First look, Washington D.C., National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Dept. of Education.
  • GRISWOLD, W.; MCDONNELL, T. y N. WRIGHT (2005), “Reading and the reading class in the twenty­first century”, Annual Review of Sociology, 31: 127­141.
  • HIRSCHMAN, A.O. (1970), Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
  • JOHNSON, S. (2006), Everything bad is good for you, Londres, Penguin.
  • KEEN, A. (2007), The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today's user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values, Nueva York, Doubleday.
  • KNULST, W., y A. VAN DEN BROEK (2003), “The readership of books in times of de­reading”, Poetics, 31(3): 213­233.
  • KORTE, W.B. y T. HÜSING (2006), Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006: Results from head teacher and A classroom teacher surveys in 27 European countries, Bonn, Empirica, (http://bit.ly/1guvKmn, acceso 16/9/13).
  • LAW, N.; PELGRUM, W.J. y T. PLOMP (eds.) (2008), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world : Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study, Nueva York, Springer.
  • LEVINE, R.; LOCKE, CH.; SEARLS, D. y D. WEINBERGER (2009), The cluetrain manifesto, Nueva York, Basic.
  • MCLUHAN, M. (1964), Understanding media: The extensions of man, Nueva York, McGraw­Hill.
  • MCLUHAN, M. y E.S. CARPENTER (eds.) (1974 [1960]), El aula sin muros. Investigaciones sobre técnicas de comunicación, Barcelona, Laia.
  • MOELLER, B. y T. REITZES (2011), Integrating technology with student-centered larning, Nellie Mae Education Foundation, Education Development Center (http://bit.ly/1guuVdi, acceso 16/9/13).
  • NEA (2005), Reading at risk: A survey of literary reading in America, Washington DC, National Endowment for the Arts.
  • NEA (2009a), 2008 survey of public participation in the arts, Washington DC, National Endowment for the Arts (http://bit.ly/1guptad, acceso 16/9/13).
  • NEA (2009b), Reading on the rise: A new chapter in American literacy, Washington DC, National Endowment for the Arts.
  • PEDRÓ, F. (2011), Tecnología y escuela: lo que funciona y por qué, XXVI Semana Monográfica de la Educación, Madrid, Santillana (http://bit. ly/1guwfgc, acceso 16/9/13).
  • POSTMAN, N. (1985), Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business, Nueva York, Viking.
  • POSTMAN, N. (1993), “Of luddites, learning, and life”, Technos Quarterly For Education and Technology, 2(4) (http://bit.ly/1guwKH2, acceso 16/9/13).
  • POSTMAN, N.(1995), “Neil Postman on Cyberspace”, entrevista con Charlene Hunter Gault, PBS, The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour (http://bit.ly/18XYJe8, acceso 16/9/13).
  • PRENSKY, M. (2006), “Don't bother me Mom, I'm learning!”: How computer and video games are preparing your kids for twenty-first century success and how you can help, St. Paul, Minn. Paragon.
  • PRENSKY, M. (2010), Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning, Thousand Oaks, Calif., Corwin.
  • PURCELL, K.; HEAPS, A.; BUCHANAN, J. y L. FRIEDRICH (2013), “How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms”, Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life (http://bit.ly/1g ux4pc, acceso 16/9/13).
  • RANCIÈRE, J. (1987), Le maître ignorant: cinq leçons sur l'émancipation intellectuelle, París, Fayard.
  • RIESMAN, D. (1956), Constraint and variety in American education, Lincoln, Neb. University of Nebraska.
  • SHAFFER, D.W. (2006), How computer games help children learn, Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • SKINNER, B.F. (1961), "Why we need teaching machines", Harvard Educational Review, 31: 377–398.
  • SMALL, G.W.; MOODY, T.D.; SIDDARTH, P. y S.Y. BOOKHEIMER (2009), “Your brain on Google: Patterns of cerebral activation during Internet searching,” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17 (2): 116–126.
  • STRAUSS, L. (1959), “What is a liberal education?”, conferencia recogida en STRAUSS, L. (1968), Liberalism: ancient and modern, Nueva York, Basic.
  • TAPSCOTT, D. (2009), Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world, Nueva York, McGraw­Hill.
  • TESTU, F. (1989), Chronopsychologie et rythmes scolaires, París, Masson.
  • TESTU, F. y G. BRÉCHON (2008), Rythmes de vie et rythmes scolaires: Aspects chronobiologiques et chronopsychologiques, Issy­les­Moulineaux, Elsevier Masson.
  • VEENHOF, B. (2006), The Internet: Is it changing the way Canadians spend their time? Ottawa, Statistics Canada (http://bit.ly/1guiRbR, acceso 15/9/2013).
  • WASTIAU, P.; BLAMIRE, R.; KEARNEY, C.; QUITTRE, V.; VAN DE GAER, E. y C. MONSEUR (2013), “The Use of ICT in Education: a survey of schools in Europe”, European Journal of Education, 48: 11–27 (DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12020).
  • YOUNG, M.F.D.; SLOTTA, S.; CUTTER, A.B.; JALETTE, G.; MULLIN, G.; BENEDICT, L.; SIMEONI, Z.; MATTHEW, T., y M. YUKHYMENKO (2012), “Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education”, Review of Educational Research, 82(1): 61­89.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet