La medición y el mapeado de las habilidades digitales

  1. Mirko Antino 1
  1. 1 Instituto Universitario de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL) (Portugal
Revista:
Panorama social

ISSN: 1699-6852

Año de publicación: 2017

Título del ejemplar: Las desigualdades digitales. Los límites de la Sociedad Red

Número: 25

Páginas: 153-176

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Panorama social

Resumen

El presente artículo tiene la finalidad de acercar a los lectores al proceso de medición científica de variables y constructos relacionados con las interacciones digitales que los ciudadanos realizan a través de Internet. Más específicamente, se centrará, en primer lugar, en revisar cómo se han medido en la literatura científica las habilidades digitales; en segundo lugar, se ofrecerá una descripción del proceso de construcción de instrumentos de medición de alto rigor científico; en tercer lugar, se procederá a ilustrar un ejemplo aplicado de cómo se puede mapear y estudiar el fenómeno de las habilidades digitales en un contexto concreto.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ATTEWELL, P. (2001), “The first and second digital divides”, Sociology of Education, 74(3): 252­-59.
  • CALVANI, A.; FINI, A.; RANIERI, M., y P. PICCI (2012), “Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers”, Computers y Education, 58(2): 797­-807.
  • DE MARCO, S.; ANTINO, M., y J. M. ROBLES (2012), “Assessing a measurement model for Digital Political Participation. a multidisciplinary point of view”, in Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance. Technologies and Methods for On­line Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making, YANNIS CHARALABIDIS y SOTIRIS KOUSSOURIS (eds.), Berlin, Springer.
  • DE VELLIS, R. F. (1991), “Scale Development. Theory and Applications”, Newbury Park, CA. SAGE.
  • DI GENNARO, C., y W. DUTTON (2006), “The Internet and the Public. Online and Offline Political Participation in the United Kingdom”, Parliamentary Affairs, 59: 299­-313.
  • DIMAGGIO, P., y E. HARGITTAI (2001), “From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’. Studying Internet use as penetration increases”, Princeton. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University 4.1, 4­21.
  • DIMAGGIO, P.; HARGITTAI, E.; CELESTE C., y S. SHAFER (2004), “From unequal access to differentiated use. A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality”, in Social Inequality, edited by KATHRYN M. NECKERMAN, New York, NY, Russell Sage Fundation.
  • DUNHAM, R. S. (1999), “Across America, a troubling ‘digital divide”, Business Week, 3640­-3651.
  • FREESE, J.; RIVAS, S., y E. HARGITTAI (2006), “Cognitive ability and Internet use among older adults”, Poetics, 34: 236-­249.
  • FURR, R. M., y V. R. BACHARACH (2008), Psychometrics. An Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE.
  • GURSTEIN, M. (2003), “Effective use. A community informatics strategy beyond the Digital Divide”, First Monday, 8(12).
  • HARGITTAI, E. (2008), “Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non­Users of Social Network Sites”, Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13: 276-­297.
  • HARGITTAI, E., y A. HINNANT (2008), “Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet”, Communication research, 35(5): 602­-621.
  • HARGITTAI, E., y A. SHAW (2015), “Mind the skills gap. the role of Internet know­how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia”, Information, Communication y Society, 18(4): 424­-42.
  • HARGITTAI, E., y G. WALEJKO (2008), “The participation divide. Content creation and sharing in the digital age”, Information Communication Society, 11(2): 239­56.
  • HOFF, J. (2008), Virtual capital? Internet competence and political participation in Denmark. MedieKultur, Journal of media and communication research, 83­-92.
  • KLINE, P. (2014), “An easy guide to factor analysis”, Routledge.
  • KRUEGER, B. S. (2002), “Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States”, American Politics Research, 30: 476­-498.
  • LITT, E. (2013), “Measuring users’ Internet skills. A review of past assessments and a look toward the future”, New Media & Society, 15(4): 612-­30.
  • MARTÍNEZ ARIAS, R.; HERNÁNDEZ-LLOREDA, M. J., y M. V. HERNÁNDEZ-LLOREDA (2006), Psicometría, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
  • MESSICK, S. (1994), “The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments”, Educational researcher, 23(2): 13-­23.
  • MOSSBERGER, K.; TOLBERT, C. J., y M. STANSBURY (2003), “Virtual inequality. Beyond the digital divide”, Georgetown University Press.
  • NORRIS, P., (2001), “Digital divide. Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide”, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • NORRIS, P., y J. Curtice (2006), “If you build a political web site, will they come?”, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(2): 1­21.
  • PODSAKOFF, P. M.; MACKENZIE, S. B.; LEE, J. Y., y N. P. PODSAKOFF (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research. a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of applied psychology, 88(5): 879.
  • ROBLES, J. M.; DE MARCO, S., y M. ANTINO (2014), “Movilización social a través de las redes sociales. La políitca con Internet y la política en Internet”, La democracia del siglo XXI. Política, medios de comunicación, Internet y redes sociales, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
  • ROBLES, J. M.; TORRES-ALBERO, C.; ANTINO, M., y S. DE MARCO (2015), “The use of digital social networks from an analytical sociology perspective. The case of Spain”, Rationality and Society, 27(4): 492-­512.
  • SOMERVILLE, M.; SMITH, G., y A. SMITH MACKLIN (2008), “The ETS iSkillsTM Assessment. a digital age tool”, The Electronic Library, 26(2): 158-­71.
  • STAFFORD, T. F.; STAFFORD ROYNE, M., y L. L. SCHKADE (2004), “Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet”, Decision Sciences, 35.
  • VAN DEURSEN, A. M., y J. VAN DIJK (2009), “Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services”, Government Information Quarterly, 26(2): 333­-40.
  • VAN DEURSEN, A. M., y J. VAN DIJK (2010), “Measuring Internet Skills”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(10): 891-­916.
  • VAN DEURSEN, A. M.; VAN DIJK, J., y O. PETERS (2011), “Rethinking Internet skills. The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium­ and content­related Internet skills”, Poetics, 39(2): 125­-44.
  • VAN DIJK, J. (2005), “The deepening divide. Inequality in the information society”, Sage Publications, Inc.
  • VAN DIJK, J. (2006), “Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings”, Poetics, 34(4­5): 221­-35.
  • VAN DIJK, J, y K. HACKER (2003), “The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon”, The information society, 19(4): 315-­26.
  • WARSCHAUER, M. (2004), “Technology and social inclusion. Rethinking the digital divide”, MIT press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet