Quoting and reporting across languagesA system-based and text-based typology

  1. Jorge Arús Hita 2
  2. Kazuhiro Teruya 3
  3. Mohamed Ali Bard 4
  4. Abhishek Kumar Kashyap 5
  5. Isaac N. Mwinlaaru 1
  1. 1 University of Cape Coast, Ghana
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España
  3. 3 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
  4. 4 Al-Maarefa Colleges for Science and Technology, Arabia Saudí
  5. 5 Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Revista:
Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association

ISSN: 0043-7956 2373-5112

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 64

Número: 2

Páginas: 69-102

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/00437956.2018.1463001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association

Resumen

This paper reports on a cross-linguistic corpus-based investigation of linguistic strategies of quoting and reporting of speech and thought across six genetically unrelated languages (Arabic, English, Dagaare, Hindi, Spanish and Japanese). Specifically, the study draws on Michael Halliday's concept of projection that covers the traditional categories of quoting and reporting as a type of logico-semantic relation. The study also examines projection “trinocularly”, by viewing quoting and reporting from three viewpoints, namely their semantics, their lexicogrammatical realizations and the structural configuration they display. The use of projection as a unified domain of inquiry and the trinocular perspective ensures a systematic accounting of the generality and specificity of projection across the languages. Section 1 specifies our investigation, relating it to the traditional account of quoting and reporting. Section 2 describes our corpus data. Section 3 introduces the theoretical and descriptive categories used to describe verbal and mental projection as a type of logico-semantic relation, using English for illustration. Section 4 presents a crosslinguistic discussion of the data from the six languages. Finally, Section 5 compares and contrasts the results of this study, discusses the general and language-specific features of projection and concludes by commenting on how our approach to quoting and reporting extends previous approaches.