Output, collaboration and impact of e-learning researchBibliometric analysis and visualizations at the country and institutional level (Scopus 2003-2016)

  1. Gerardo Tibaná-Herrera 1
  2. María-Teresa Fernández-Bajón 1
  3. Félix De-Moya-Anegón 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 CSIC-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2018

Título del ejemplar: Información política y redes sociales (I)

Volumen: 27

Número: 5

Páginas: 1082-1096

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2018.SEP.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Resumen

Este trabajo analiza los indicadores bibliométricos de producción e impacto de investigación sobre e-learning, para conocer el aporte de los países y de las instituciones en el desarrollo científico de esta temática y para fortalecer su caracterización como dominio de conocimiento. Se extrajeron los indicadores bibliométricos de 39.244 documentos indexados en Scopus y en SCImago Institutional Rankings y se generaron mapas de la producción y de las redes de colaboración y gráficas del impacto de la investigación de países e instituciones. Los resultados de este análisis combinado muestran que, a nivel de país, los Estados Unidos producen la mayor cantidad de trabajos y la mayor colaboración internacional. A nivel institucional, la Universidad de Hong Kong es la más productiva y la Universidad Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de Taiwán es la que cuenta con la mayor colaboración. Además, el análisis mostró que Taiwán ocupa los primeros lugares en productividad e impacto, por lo cual se vincularon estos resultados con un breve análisis de sus políticas nacionales. Este estudio presenta una nueva metodología para analizar dominios de conocimiento tanto emergentes como establecidos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barjak, Franz; Eccles, Kathryn; Meyer, Eric; Robinson, Simon; Schroeder, Ralph (2013). “The emerging governance of e-infrastructure”. Journal of computer-mediated communication, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12000
  • Bengtsson, Jarl (2013). “National strategies for implementing lifelong learning (LLL) – the gap between policy and reality: An international perspective”. International review of education, v. 59, n. 3, pp. 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9362-4
  • Bergstrom, Carl (2007). “Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals”. College & research libraries news, v. 68, n. 5, pp. 314-316. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.68.5.7804
  • Bornmann, Lutz; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2014). “What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 4, pp. 732-736. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23047
  • Bornmann, Lutz; Wohlrabe, Klaus; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2017). “Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers?”. Scientometrics, v. 112, n. 3, pp. 1859-1864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2446-3
  • Chang, Maiga; Wang, Chin-Yeh; Chen, Gwo-Dong (2009). “National program for e-learning in Taiwan” Educational technology & society, v. 12, n. 1, pp. 5-17.
  • Cheng, Bo; Wang, Minhong; Mørch, Anders; Chen, NianShing; Kinshuk; Spector, J. Michael (2014). “Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000-2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature”. Educational research review, v. 11, pp. 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.01.001
  • Chiang, Johannes K.; Kuo, Chen-Wo; Yang, Yu-Hsiang (2010). “A bibliometric study of e-learning literature on SSCI database”. In: Intl conf on technologies for e-learning and digital entertainment, pp. 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14533-9_15
  • Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; Hassan-Montero, Yusef; González-Molina, Antonio; DeMoya-Anegón, Félix (2010). “New approach to the visualization of international scientific collaboration”. Information visualization, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2009.31
  • De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2012). “Liderazgo y excelencia de la ciencia española”. El profesional de la informacion, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 125-128. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.01
  • De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; Corera-Álvarez, Elena; Gómez-Crisóstomo, Rocío; González-Molina, Antonio; Hassan-Montero, Yusef; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín (2009). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española 2007. Informe 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10261/72286
  • Elzinga, Aant (1997). “The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies”. Higher education policy, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 94-97. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1016/S0952-8733(97)89702-4
  • Garfield, Eugene; Sher, Irving H. (1963). “New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing”. American documentation, v. 14, n. 3, pp. 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140304
  • Gómez-Núñez, Antonio J.; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Glänzel, Wolfang (2011). “Improving SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) subject classification through reference analysis”. Scientometrics, v. 89, n. 3, pp. 741-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0485-8
  • González-Pereira, Borja; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2010). “A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator”. Journal of informetrics, v. 4, n. 3, pp. 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002
  • Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2015). “Analysis of scientific production in food science from 2003 to 2013”. Journal of food science, v. 80, n. 12, R2619-R2626. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13108
  • Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2016a). “Atlas of scientific institutions in food science (Scopus, 2003-2013)”. LWT Food science and technology, v. 67, pp. 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.035
  • Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; Olmeda-Gómez, Carlos; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2016b). “La ciencia de los alimentos georreferenciada. Aproximación bibliométrica a nivel institucional”. El profesional de la información, v. 25, n. 1, p. 25-34. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.ene.04
  • Hirsch, Jorge E. (2005). “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 102, n. 46, pp. 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  • Hoekman, Jarno; Frenken, Koen; Tijssen, Robert (2010). “Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe”. Research policy, v. 39, n. 5, pp. 662-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012
  • Hung, Jui-Long (2012). “Trends of e-learning research from 2000 to 2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics”. British journal of educational technology, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01144.x
  • Kanai, J. Miguel; Grant, Richard; Jianu, Radu (2017). “Cities on and off the map: A bibliometric assessment of urban globalisation research”. Urban studies, v. 55, n. 12, pp. 2569-2585. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1016/S0952-8733(97)89702-4 https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017720385
  • Lévy-Mangin, Jean-Pierre; Varela-Mallou, Jesús (2003). Análisis multivariable para las ciencias sociales. Madrid, España: Pearson Educación. ISBN: 978 84 205 3727 6
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; Wagner, Caroline S.; Park, Han-Woo; Adams, Jonathan (2013). “International collaboration in science: The global map and the network”. El profesional de la información, v. 22, n. 1, pp. 87-94. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2013.ene.12
  • Lin, Simon C.; Yen, Eric (2012). “An introduction to Taiwan e-Learning and Digital Archives Program (Teldap)”. International journal of humanities and arts computing, v. 6, n. 1-2, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2012.0034
  • Maggio, Agata; Kuffer, Josef; Lazzari, Maurizio (2017). “Advances and trends in bibliographic research: Examples of new technological applications for the cataloguing of the georeferenced library heritage”. Journal of librarianship and information science, v. 49, n. 3, pp. 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616652134
  • Maurer, Hermann; Salman-Khan, Muhammad (2010). “Research trends in the field of e-learning from 2003 to 2008: A scientometric and content analysis for selected journals and conferences using visualization”. Interactive technology and smart education, v. 7, n. 1, pp. 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/17415651011031617
  • Mingers, John; Leydesdorff, Loet (2015). “A review of theory and practice in scientometrics”. European journal of operational research, v. 246, n. 1, pp. 1-19. https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.05462 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002
  • Moed, Henk F. (2010). “Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals”. Journal of informetrics, v. 4, n. 3, pp. 265-277. https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2632 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
  • Okubo, Yoshiko (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/208277770603
  • Persson, Olle (2010). “Are highly cited papers more international?”. Scientometrics, v. 83, n. 2, pp. 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0007-0
  • Rehn, Catharina; Kronman, Ulf (2008). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1480.9447
  • Rehn, Catharina; Wadskog, Daniel; Gornitzki, Carl; Larsson, Agne (2014). Bibliometric indicators. Definitions and usage at Karolinska Institutet. Karolinska Institutet. https://kib.ki.se/sites/default/files/bildarkiv/Dokument/ bibliometric_indicators_2014.pdf
  • Romo-Fernández, Luz M.; López-Pujalte, Cristina; Guerrero Bote, Vicente P.; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2011). “Analysis of Europe’s scientific production on renewable energies”. Renewable energy, v. 36, n. 9, pp. 2529-2537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.02.001
  • Schiebel, Edgar (2012). “Visualization of research fronts and knowledge bases by three-dimensional areal densities of bibliographically coupled publications and co-citations”. Scientometrics, v. 91, n. 2, pp. 557-566. https://doi.org//10.1007/s11192-012-0626-8
  • Shih, Meilun; Feng, Jui; Tsai, Chin-Chung (2008). “Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals”. Computers & education, v. 51, n. 2, pp. 955-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.004
  • Tibaná-Herrera, Gerardo; Fernández-Bajón, María-Teresa; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2018a). “Categorization of e-learning as an emerging discipline in the world publication system: a bibliometric study in Scopus”. International journal of educational technology in higher education, v. 15, n. 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0103-4
  • Tibaná-Herrera, Gerardo; Fernández-Bajón, María-Teresa; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2018b). “Global analysis of the e-learning scientific domain: a declining category?”. Scientometrics, v. 114, n. 2, pp. 675-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2592-7
  • Waltman, Ludo; Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Van-Leeuwen, Thed N.; Visser, Martijn S.; Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (2011). “Towards a new Crown indicator: an empirical analysis”. Scientometrics, v. 87, n. 3, pp. 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0354-5
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet