Emotional or rational product labeling using galvanic skin response

  1. Alonso López, Mikel 1
  2. Blasco López, Mª Francisca 1
  3. Molero Ayala, Victor 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Redmarka: revista académica de marketing aplicado

ISSN: 1852-2300

Año de publicación: 2018

Número: 20

Páginas: 97-114

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17979/REDMA.2018.01.020.4814 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Redmarka: revista académica de marketing aplicado

Resumen

In the research on consumer purchasing decisions, there has historically been a constant duality between the presence or absence of emotions and their role. Historically they have been observed as annoyances that interfere with optimal process, as it would be rational and cognitive. Since the late 70s, some researches emerged defending the importance of emotional processes in decision-making. The latest studies also persist in the idea that emotions are present in all product purchase decisions. But, does it occur with the same intensity in all types of products? In this research paper, an experiment is proposed to classify different products in two categories, one that concentrates those that generate a more intense emotional response and another with less intensity. This categorization is interesting for those experiments in which it is necessary, either for statistical treatment or for other reasons, grouping products by emotional response.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological bulletin, 51(4), 380.
  • Etzioni, A. (1988). Normative-affective factors: toward a new decision-making model. Journal of Economic-Psycology, vol 9, pp. 125-150.
  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., y Lichtenstein, S. (1988). Knowing what you want: Measure labile values. Cambridge University Press pp. 398-421.
  • Hsee, C.K. (1998). Less is Better: when low-value optons are valued more highly than high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol 11, pp. 107-121.
  • Kendal, A., Bloom, E.D. y Montgomery, H. (1997). Perspectives and emotions in personal decision making. Cognitive models and explanations. pp. 73-89.
  • Lewicka, M. (1997). Is hate wiser than love?. Decision Making, R. Ranyard, W.R. Crozier & O. Svenson (eds.). Routledge, New York, pp.91-106.
  • Mackie, D. y Worth, L. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 57, pp. 27-40.
  • Mellers, B., Schwartz, A. y Cooke, A. (1998). Judment and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psicol. 49: pp. 447-477.
  • Mikel, J., Maglio, S., Reed, A. y Kaplowitz, L. (2011). Should I Go With My Gut? Investigating the Benefits of Emotion-Focused Decision Making. Emotion 2011, Vol. 11, No. 4, 743–753
  • Mitchell D. (2011). The nexus between decision making and emotion regulation: A review of convergent neurocognitive substrates. Behavioural Brain Research 217 (2011) 215–231
  • Schneider, J.A. y Barnes, L.L. (2003). What do people really want? Goals and context in Decision Making. Emerging perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research. Cambridge University Press pp. 394-427.
  • Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American economic review, 253-283.
  • Svenson, O. (2003). Values, affect and processes in Human Decisión Making. A differentiation and consolidation theory perspective. Emerging perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research. Cambridge University Press pp. 287-326.
  • Westbrook, R. A. y Oliver, R. L. (1991). The dimensionality of Consumption Emotion patterns and consumer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 18,1 pp. 84-91.
  • Zajonc, R. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferentes need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, pp. 151-175.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet