Los objetos que personalizan los dormitorios y su relación con el apego y el self

  1. Lucía Poggio 1
  2. Blanca Fraijo-Sing 2
  3. Juan-Ignacio Aragonés 3
  4. César Tapia-Fonllem 2
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

  2. 2 Universidad de Sonora (México)
  3. 3 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

ISSN: 0213-4748 1579-3680

Ano de publicación: 2018

Volume: 33

Número: 1

Páxinas: 13-25

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

Resumo

The personalization of space is constructed through the items that the resident distributes around the space they inhabit, and they can be considered part of the resident’s self. Three studies were conducted with the goal of establishing the categories into which the objects contained in bedrooms can be organized and to evaluate to what extent these categories are related to the extended self and attachment. In the first study, with 77 students, we obtained a list of the most representative objects in their bedrooms. In the next study, a group of 56 students classified these objects freely using their own criteria; a subsequent cluster analysis showed four categories: Functional, Personal Grooming, Symbolic and Free Time. In the last study, 144 students evaluated the relationship between the categories of the objects and the extended self and attachment. The results showed that the residents’ representative objects were part of their extended self more than the level of attachment attributed to these objects.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers' identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 171-184. doi:10.1086/429607
  • Altman, I., & Chemers, M. (1980). Culture and Environment,
  • Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place Attachment,
  • Amérigo, M., & López, R. P. (2010). Ambientes residenciales. Psicología Ambiental, , 163-182.
  • Aragonés, J. I., & Pérez-López, R. (2009). Personalización del dormitorio: Descripción, sentimientos y conductas. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 10, 287-301.
  • Becker, F. D. (1977). Housing Messages,
  • Belk, R. W. (1992). Attachment to possessions. Place Attachment, , 37-62.
  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
  • Belk, R. W. (1991). The ineluctable mysteries of possessions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 17-55.
  • Brown, B. B. (1987). Territoriality. Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 1, 505-531.
  • Cooper Marcus, C. (1995). House as a Mirror of Self: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home,
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self,
  • Denton, T. (1970). The presentation of self in household settings. Anthropologica, 12, 221-240.
  • Dittmar, H. (1992). The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To have is to be,
  • Dittmar, H. (1991). Meanings of material possessions as reflections of identity: Gender and social-material position in society. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 165-186.
  • Gallagher, W. (2006). House Thinking,
  • Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice,
  • Gill, A. (1984). Environmental Personalization in Institutional Settings,
  • Gómez, Á., Huici, C., & Morales, J. -. (2004). We like others to see us…the way we are! implications of self-verification theory at a group level. [¡nos gusta que nos vean…como somos! implicaciones de la teoría de la auto-verificación a nivel intergrupal] Revista De Psicologia Social, 19(2), 139-157. doi:10.1174/021347404773820954
  • Hernández, B., Carmen Hidalgo, M., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310-319. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
  • Horwitz, J., & Tognoli, J. (1982). Role of home in adult development: Women and men living alone describe their residential history. Family Relations, 31(3), 335-341.
  • James, W. (1989). La conciencia del yo. Principios De Psicología, , 233-319.
  • Kleine, S. S., Kleine III, R. E., & Allen, C. T. (1995). How is a possession 'me' or 'not me'? characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(DECEMBER), 327-343.
  • Moore, J. (2000). Placing home in context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 207-217. doi:10.1006/jevp.2000.0178
  • Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why we Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things,
  • Pérez-López, R., Aragonés, J. -., & Amérigo, M. (2013). Thin slices of competence and warmth via personalized primary spaces. [Inferencias en términos de competencia y cordialidad a través de la personalización del espacio primario] Psyecology, 4(3), 267-286. doi:10.1174/217119713807749878
  • Poggio, L. (2015). Personalization of Primary Spaces through Objects,
  • Poggio, L., Aragonés, J. I., & Pérez-López, R. (2013). Inferences of personality traits from bedroom objects: An approach from the SCM. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 668-673.
  • Prelinger, E. (1959). Extension and structure of the self. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 47(1), 13-23. doi:10.1080/00223980.1959.9916303
  • Prentice, D. A. (1987). Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 993-1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.993
  • Rullo, G. (1987). People and home interiors:A bibliography of recent psychological research. Environment and Behavior, 19(2), 250-259. doi:10.1177/0013916587192009
  • Sadalla, E. K., Vershure, B., & Burroughs, J. (1987). Identity symbolism in housing. Environment and Behavior, 19(5), 569-587. doi:10.1177/0013916587195002
  • Sartre, J. P. (1966). El Ser y La Nada,
  • Serfaty-Garzon, P. (2003). Chez Soi: Les Territoires De l'Intimité,
  • Solomon, M. R. (2008). El yo. Comportamiento Del Consumidor, , 154-193.
  • Veitch, R., & Arkkelin, D. (1995). Environmental Psychology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective,