La cultura de la confianza en tiempos de crisisanálisis de los discursos

  1. Javier Callejo 1
  2. Ramón Ramos 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
RES. Revista Española de Sociología

ISSN: 2445-0367,  1578-2824

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 26

Issue: 2

Pages: 185-200

Type: Article

DOI: 10.22325/FES/RES.2017.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: RES. Revista Española de Sociología

Abstract

This article studies the discourses on trust of lay, non-expert, social actors in Spain. It is centred in a research on the way of understanding the next future within the context of the Spanish socialeconomical crisis. The material for the analysis was supplied by nine focus groups formed by participants that were differently affected by the crisis and social-economical risks. While finding out that the term “trust” is rarely used during the spontaneous discourse of the actors, it shows the coexistence of a certain lack of trust in the institutions but trust in society. It is concluded that beyond the circumstances of the crisis, the actors preserve a critical and conditional trust in society in order to face the uncertainties and risks put in their future.

€ View funding

Funding information

El presente artículo es uno de los resultados de la investigación “Riesgo, incertidumbre y vulnerabilidad en España”, cuyo IP es Ramón Ramos, habiendo estado financiada por el Plan Nacional de Investigación con la referencia CSO-2010-20135.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Adam, B.; Beck, U., Van Loon, J. (2000). The risk society and beyond, Critical issues for social theory. London: Sage.
  • Alonso, L. E. (1998). La mirada cualitativa. Madrid: Fundamentos.
  • Am, T. G. (2011). Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies, Nanoethics, 5, 15-28.
  • Antaki, C.; Billig, M.; Edwards, D.; Potter, J. (2003). El análisis del discurso significa analizar: Crítica de seis atajos analíticos, Athenea Digital, 3, 14-35.
  • Barbalet, J. (2009). A characterization of trust, and its consequences. Theory and Society, 38, 367-382.
  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Miedo líquido. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Beck, U. (1998). La sociedad del riesgo. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2002). Questions de Sociologie. Paris: Minuit.
  • Brehm, J. y Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999-1024.
  • Callejo, J. (1998). Los límites de la formalización de las prácticas cualitativas de investigación social: la saturación, Sociológica, 3, 93-120.
  • Castel, R. (2009). La montée des incertitudes. Paris: Seuil.
  • Coleman, J. S. (2011). Fundamentos de teoría social. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Das, T. K., Bing-Sheng, T. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: a conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 19 (1). Fall, (2004), 85-116.
  • Denters, B., Gabriel, O., Torcal, M. (2007). Political confidence in representative democracies. En Jan W. van Deth, José Ramón Montero y Anders Westholm (eds.). Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis (pp. 66-87). Oxford: Routledge.
  • Douglas, M., Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture. Berkeley. Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
  • Earle, T. C., Cvetkovich, G. T. (1995). Social Trust. Towards a Cosmopolitan Society. London: Praeger.
  • Einsenstadt, S. N., Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, Clients and Friends. Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. North Carolina: Wake Forest University.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: The Free Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (2000). Un mundo desbocado. Madrid: Taurus.
  • Hardin, R. (1996). ‘Trustworthiness’, Ethics 107, 26-42. Hardin, R. (1988). ‘Trust in Government’, in M. Levi and V. Braithwaite (eds.). Trust and Governance (pp. 9-27). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Hejmslev, L. (1971). Prolegómenos de una teoría del lenguaje, Madrid: Gredos.
  • Inglehart, R. (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy, en M. E. Warren (ed.). Democracy and Trust (pp. 88-120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Irwin, A., Dale, A. y Smith, D. (1996). Science and Hell’s Kitchen: The local understanding of hazard issues. En A. Irwin y B. Wynne (eds.). Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jakobson, R. (1975). Ensayos de lingüística general. Barcelona: Seix Barral.
  • Kasperson, R., Golding, E. D. y Tuler, S. (1992). Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48 (4), 161-187.
  • Khodyakhov, D. (2007). Trust as a process: A threedimensional approach. Sociology, 41 (1), 115-132.
  • Klingemann, H.-D. (1999). ‘Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis’, in P. Norris (ed.). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 31-56.
  • Koselleck, R. (2007). Crítica y crisis: un estudio sobre la patogénesis del mundo burgués. Madrid: Trotta.
  • Löfstedt, R. (2005). Risk Magement in Post-Trust Societies. London: Earthscan.
  • Luhmann, N. (1992). Sociología del riesgo. Guadalajara (Méx.): Universidad Iberoamericana y Universidad de Guadalajara.
  • Luhmann, N. (1996). Confianza. Barcelona: Anthropos.
  • Luhmann, N. (2000). La realidad de los medios de masas. Barcelona: Anthropos.
  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1987). La condición postmoderna. Madrid: Cátedra.
  • Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Mythen, G., Walklate, S. (eds.) (2006). Beyond the risk society. Maidenhead UK: Open University Press.
  • Offe, C. (1999). How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens? En M. Warren (ed.). Democracy and Trust (pp. 42-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pidgeon, N. F., Kasperson, F. R. E. y Slovic, P. (2003). The Social Amplification of Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pixley, J. (2004). Emotions in Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation, Risk Analysis, 23 (5). 961-972.
  • Putnam, R. (1995). Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28 (4), 664-683.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Ramos Torre, R. (1999). Prometeo y las flores del mal: el problema del riesgo en la sociología contemporánea. En R. Ramos Torre y F. G.ª Selgas (eds.). Globalización, riesgo, reflexividad. Tres temas de la teoría social contemporánea (pp. 249-274). Madrid: CIS.
  • Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.
  • Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sabel, C. F. (1993). Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46: 1133-1170.
  • Seligman, A. B. (1998).Trust and Sociability: On the limits of confidence and role expectations. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 57 (4), 391-404.
  • Simmel, G. (2013). Filosofía del dinero. Madrid: Capitán Swing.
  • Sjóberg, L. (2001). Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Analysis, 21 (1), 189-198.
  • Solá, R., Prades, A., Esplugas, J., Real, M. (2009). Confianza, incertidumbre y percepción social de las tecnologías avanzadas: un estudio de caso. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 67 (1), 161-175
  • Stivers, R. (1994). The culture of cynicism: American morality in decline. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taylor-Gooby, P., Zinn, J. O. (2006). Current Directions in Risk Research: ‘New Developments in Psychology and Sociology’. Risk Analysis, 26 (2), 397-411.
  • Thuderoz, Ch. (2003). Introduction au propos: la confiance en question, in V. Mangematin and Ch. Thuderoz (dir.). Des mondes de confiance (pp. 19-30). Paris: CNRS.
  • Tulloch, J., Lupton, D. (2003). Risk and everyday life. London: SAGE.
  • Turner, J. H. (2007). Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Uslaner, E. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walls, J. Pidgeon, N. Weyman, A., Horlick-Jones, T. (2004). Critical trust: understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation. Health, Risk & Society, 6 (2), 133-150.
  • Wilkinson, I. (2006). Risk, Vulnerability and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
  • Zinn, J. O. (ed.) (2008). Social theories of risk and uncertainty. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Data source: Dialnet