The Consulting ArtistNotes on the Hermeneutics of Detection in the Sherlock Holmes Canon

  1. Eduardo Valls Oyarzun 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revue:
Babel A.F.I.A.L.: Aspectos de filología inglesa y alemana

ISSN: 1132-7332

Année de publication: 2018

Número: 27

Pages: 181-205

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: Babel A.F.I.A.L.: Aspectos de filología inglesa y alemana

Résumé

The following pages tackle the Sherlock Holmes canon (in the late Victorian period) by probing into the hermeneutical nature embedded in the system of detection it develops. After discussing the notion of “revealing,” the article delves into several strategies that lead up to the construing of Sherlock Holmes not so much as a detective, but as an artist, specifically, a decadent, fin-de-siècle type of artist, in the aesthetic vein of Oscar Wilde. Furthermore, the overall reinterpretation of the character helps disclose the postmodern momentum that sits at the core of the Sherlock Holmes canon in particular and the decadent movement in general. Lastly, the article analyses the novel The Sign of Four (1890) in order to illustrate the general principles posited here and how they bespeak part of the attraction the character of Holmes showcases nowadays.

Références bibliographiques

  • Anger, S. 2005. Victorian Interpretation. Ithaca and London: CornellUniversity Press.
  • Arata, S. 2010. Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin de Siècle: Identity andEmpire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Auerbach, N. 1982. Woman and the Demon. Cambridge: HarvardUniversity Press.
  • Beckson, K. 1998. The Oscar Wilde Encyclopedia. New York: AMS Press.
  • Butler, J. 2006. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.New York: Routledge.
  • Danson, L. 2000. “Wilde as Critic and Theorist,” in P. Raby, ed. TheCambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 80-95.
  • Deleuze, G. 2004. Difference and Repetition, ed. and trans. by P. Patton.London: Continuum.
  • Demeter, T. 2011. “A Touch of the Dramatic,” in J. Stieff, ed. SherlockHolmes and Philosophy: The Footprints of a Gigantic Mind.Chicago: Open Court. 197-208.
  • Denisoff, D. 2007. “Decadentismand Aestheticism,” in G. Marshall,ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Fin de Siècle. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 31-52.
  • Dickens, C. 2008. A Tale of Two Cities, ed. by A. Sanders.Oxford: OUP.
  • Donohue, J. 2000. “Distance, Death and Desire in Salome,” in P. Raby,ed. The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 118-142.
  • Dowd, T. 2011. “The Game has VirtuallyStumbled,” in J. Stieff, ed.Sherlock Holmes and Philosophy: The Footprints of a Gigantic Mind.Chicago: Open Court. 93-102.
  • Doyle, A. C. 1981. “The Five Orange Pips,” in The CompleteSherlockHolmes. New York: Penguin. 217-228.
  • Doyle, A. C. 2015. “A Study in Scarlet,” in M. Dirda, ed. SherlockHolmes: the Novels. New York: Penguin. 1-128.
  • Doyle, A. C. 2015. “Silver Blaze,” in The Complete Sherlock Holmes.NewYork: Penguin. 335-349.
  • Doyle, A. C. 2015. “The Hound of the Baskervilles,” in M. Dirda, ed.Sherlock Holmes: the Novels. New York: Penguin. 245-408.
  • Doyle, A. C. 2015. “The Sign of Four,” in M. Dirda, ed. SherlockHolmes: the Novels. New York: Penguin. 129-244.
  • Gagnier, R. 1997. “Wilde and the Victorians,” in P. Raby, ed. TheCambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 18-33.
  • Gray, J. 2012. “A Point of View: The Enduring Appeal of SherlockHolmes,” in BBC News Online Magazine. URL:http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-19268563. Ret. 03/13/2017.
  • Jones, A. M. 2010. “Literary Theory,” in F. O’Gorman, ed. TheCambridge Companion to Victorian Culture. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 236-254.
  • Kayman, M. 2003. “The Short Story from Poe to Chesterton,” in M.Priestman, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Crime Fiction.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 41-58.
  • Kingston, A. 2007. Oscar Wilde as a Character in Victorian Fiction.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Knight, S. 1980. Form and Ideology in Crime Fiction. London: PalgraveMacmillan.
  • LeCercle, J. J. 2002. Deleuze and Language. London: PalgraveMacmillan.
  • Nietzsche, F. 1979. “On Truth and Lies a Nonmoral sense,” in D.Breazeale, ed. and trans. Philosophy and Truth: Selections fromNietzsche’s Notebooks of the Early 1870’s. New Jerey: AtlanticHighlands. 10-24.
  • Nietzsche, F. 2001. Gay Science With A Prelude In German Rhymes And AnAppendix Of Songs,ed. and trans. by B. Williams.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • Ousby, I. 1976. Bloodhounds of Heaven: The Detective in English Fictionfrom Godwin to Doyle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Reed, J. 2005. “Laws, the Legal World and Politics,” in P. Brantlingerand W. B. Thesing, eds. A Companion to the Victorian Novel.Oxford: Blackwell. 155-171.
  • Ruskin, J. 1912. “Fiction, Fair and Foul, The Nineteenth Century(June 1880)” in E. T. Cook and A. Wedderburn, eds. TheLibrary Edition of the Works of John Ruskin, 39 vols. (XXXIV).London: Allen. 941-962.
  • Shepherd, M. 1985. Sherlock Holmes and the Case of Dr Freud. London:Tavistock.
  • Spackman, B. 1999. “Interversions,” in L. Constable, D. DenisoffandM. Potolsky, eds. Perennial Decay: On the Aesthetics and Politics ofDecadence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 35-49.
  • Wilde, O. 2000a. “Critic as Artist,” in I. Murray, ed. Oscar Wilde: TheMajor Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.241-298. [CriticArtist]
  • Wilde, O. 2000b. “Decay of Lying,” in I. Murray, ed. Oscar Wilde: TheMajor Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.215-240.
  • Wilde, O. 2006. The Picture of Dorian Gray. Ed. by R. Mighal. New York: Penguin.