European Secularity and “accommodation” strategies as a way to integration. A view from politics and lawLa secularidad europea y las estrategias de “acomodo” como vía de integración. Una visión desde la política y el derecho

  1. ROSA MARÍA MARTÍNEZ DE CODES
Zeitschrift:
Revista General de Derecho Canónico y Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado

ISSN: 1696-9669

Datum der Publikation: 2019

Nummer: 49

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Andere Publikationen in: Revista General de Derecho Canónico y Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado

Zusammenfassung

Public authorities in Europe are faced with increasing demands to accommodate religious diversity. This text traces some key issues concerning the limits of the secular State in Europe to accept and accommodate those ethno-religious minorities that are perceived to be partially different entities and claim some jurisdiction without thereby rejecting guarantees from the receiving official legal system. The migratory process that we are experiencing in Europe, in the last decades, reveals a change of direction from south to north, which is beginning to influence the legal systems of the European countries that receive this migration in different ways. Although the strength of legal monism has prevented the phenomenon from becoming immediately apparent, migration subjects the law to new interpretations and enables the development of emergent hybrid structures and complementary systems that bring to light complex forms of cultural transposition. This essay aims to be a starting point for analyzing EU proposals by asking questions such as: Are European institutions in favour of integration? Can constitutional frameworks open possibilities to address plurality and the intermingling of normativities? To what extent should European societies accommodate, and if so, how should they set about doing so, and within what limits?

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Timmermans, F. 2016. Commission brings together non-confessional organizations to discuss "Migration, integration and European values: putting values into action", European Commission, Brussels, press release. (15 December, 2017). Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-4342_en.htm.
  • Modood, T. and Bovenkerk, F. 2017. “Multiculturalism – How can Society deal with it? A Thinking Exercise in Flanders”, KVAB Standpunt, 51, 4-5.
  • Poulter, S. 2001. Ethnicity, Law and Human Rights. The English Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Malik, M. 2012. Minority Legal Orders in the UK: Minorities, Pluralism and the Law. London: British Academy Policy Centre.
  • Barry, B. 1997, “Liberalism and Multiculturalism” in Ethical Perspectives, 4(2), 3-13.
  • Kymlicka, W. 2015. The Essentialist Critique of Multiculturalism: Theories, Policies, Ethos, in Multiculturalism Rethought: Interpretations, Dilemmas and New Directions, edited by V. Uberoi and T. Modood. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 209-249.
  • Kukathas, Ch. 1998. Liberalism and Multiculturalism. The Politics of Indifference, Political Theory, 26 (5): 686-699.
  • Joppke, Ch. 2016. Is multiculturalism dead? Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Niessen, J. 2000. Diversity and Cohesion: New Challenges for the Integration of Immigrants and Minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe,11.
  • Kymlicka, W. 2012. Comment on Meer and Modood. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(2), 213.
  • Bouchard, G. and Taylor, Ch. 2008. Building the Future: A Time for Reconciliation. Commission de consultation sur les pratiques d’accommodement reliées aux différences culturelles. Québec: Gouvernment de Québec.
  • Modood, T. and Bovenkerk, F. 2017. Multiculturalism – How can Society deal with it? A Thinking Exercise in Flanders, KVAB Standpunt, 51, 16-19.
  • Martínez-Torrón, J. 2014. Símbolos religiosos institucionales, neutralidad del Estado y protección de las minorías en Europa. Ius Canonicum, 54 (107), 107-144.
  • Dupret, B; Berger, M; Al-Zwaini, L. 1999. Legal Pluralism in the Arab World. The Hague, Kluwer.
  • Gaudreault-DesBiens, J-F. 2006. Constitutional values, faith-based arbitration, and the limits of private justice in multicultural society. National Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(1):155-191.
  • Gaviria Díaz, C. 2002. Sentencias: herejías constitucionales. Colombia, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Arbeláez de Tobón, L. 2004. La Jurisdicción Especial Indígena en Colombia y los mecanismos de coordinación con el sistema judicial nacional. República de Colombia. Rama judicial del poder público. Consejo Superior de la Judicatura.
  • Ferrari, S. 1999, Globalization, Postmodernism and Proselytism. Fides et Libertas, MD: International Religious Liberty Association, 13-27.
  • Palomino Lozano, R. 2014.Neutralidad del Estado y Espacio Público. Aranzadi. Madrid.
  • Bouchard, G. and Taylor, Ch. 2008. Building the Future: A Time for Reconciliation. Commission de consultation sur les pratiques d’accommodement reliées aux différences culturelles. Québec: Gouvernment de Québec, 289.
  • Henrand, K. January 2016. “Duties of reasonable accommodation on grounds of religion in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: A tale of (baby) steps forward and missed opportunities”. Int J Const Law, 14 (4): 961-983.
  • The Archbishop of Canterbury, February 8th 2008 in Williams, R. (ed) “Civil and Religious Law in England. A Religious Perspective”, Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 10 (3), 262-282. (10 April, 2017). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956618X08001403.
  • Carrascosa, J. 2003. Nuevos derechos de familia y derecho internacional privado en el siglo XXI. Anales de Derecho. Universidad de Murcia, 21:109-143.
  • Juárez Pérez, P. 2012. “Jurisdicción española y poligamia islámica: ¿un matrimonio forzoso?” Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), 23:1-45.
  • Motilla de la Calle, A. 2011. “Multiculturalidad, derecho islámico y ordenamiento secular; los supuestos de la poligamia y el repudio”, Perspectivas actuales de las fuentes del derecho, M.C. Barranco Avilés, Ó. Celador Angón, F. Vacas Fernández (coords.), Dykinson, Madrid
  • Combalía, Z. Diago Diago, P. y González Varas, A. (coords.) 2011. Derecho Islámico e Interculturalidad, Iustel, Madrid.
  • Hellum, A.; Katsande, R. 2017. “Gender, Human Rights and Legal Pluralities in Southern Africa: A Matter of Context and Power”. In G. Corradi; E. Brems, and M. Goodale (ed.), Human Rights encounter Legal Pluralism, Hart Publishing Ltd. 7 :119-136.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet