Efectividad de la terapia de presión negativa en la cura de úlceras de pie diabéticorevisión sistemática

  1. M. González Ruiz 1
  2. J. I. Torres González 1
  3. M. J. Pérez Granda 1
  4. M. Leñero Cirujano 1
  5. A Corpa García 1
  6. J. Jurado Manso 1
  7. J. Gómez Higuera 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Revista Internacional de Ciencias Podológicas

ISSN: 1887-7249

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 12

Issue: 1

Pages: 1-13

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/RICP.57985 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Internacional de Ciencias Podológicas

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers are one of the major causes of disability in patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). The Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is one of the major procedures in his treatment, estimulating granulation, draining exudate and reducing edema.e Objectives: To realize a systematic review about the effectiveness and the real clinical application of NPWT use in diabetic foot ulcers Methods: The literature search has been made in November 2016 in PubMed, CINAHL, SciELO and Web of Science databases, with the kew words (“negative pressure wound therapy” OR “vacuum assisted closure” OR “vacuum sealing drainage”) AND (“diabetic foot” OR “diabetic wound” OR “diabetic ulcer”). Were selected publications whose designs were randomized clinical trials (RCTs), according PRISMA declaration criteria, and whose objective was to analyze the study objective. Results: Twelve RCTs were found with sufficient methodological quality. 7 of the RCTs used as the main variable the surface of the wound bed and 5 used the time to granulation. Conclusions: NPWT get a greater granulation area, a smaller wound healing time and a minor time to start the granulation

Bibliographic References

  • Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Informe Mundial sobre la Diabetes [Internet]. Informe Mundial sobre la Diabetes. 2016. Disponible en: http://www.idf.org/node/26452?language=es.
  • Asociación Española de Enfermería Vascular y Heridas. Guía de práctica clínica: Consenso sobre úlceras vasculares y pie diabético. Segunda edición. Sevilla: AEEVH, 2014.
  • Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al. Email Alerts Prevalence of Obesity, Diabetes, and Obesity-Related Health Risk Factors. Jama. 2003;289(1):76-9.
  • Isaac AL, Armstrong DG. Negative pressure wound therapy and other new therapies for diabetic foot ulceration: The current state of play. Med Clin North Am [Internet]. 2013;97(5):899-909. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2013.03.015.
  • Vela Orús MP, Osma Chacharro S, Ortiz García-Diego N, Chirivella Ramón MT. Uso de la terapia de presión negativa en el tratamiento de las úlceras de pie diabético. Angiologia. 2015;67(5):427-30.
  • Dzieciuchowicz L, Espinosa G, Grochowicz L. El sistema de cierre asistido al vacío en el tratamiento del pie diabético avanzado. Cir Esp. 2009;86(4):213-8.
  • Xia C, Yu A, Qi B, Zhou M, Li Z, Wang W. Analysis of blood flow and local expression of angiogenesis‑associated growth factors in infected wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9:1749-54.
  • Yao M, Fabbi M, Hayashi H, Park N, Attala K, Gu G, et al. A retrospective cohort study evaluating efficacy in high-risk patients with chronic lower extremity ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy. Int Wound J. 2014;11(5):483-8.
  • Monsen C, Acosta S, Mani K, Wann-Hansson C. A randomised study of NPWT closure versus alginate dressings in peri-vascular groin infections: quality of life, pain and cost. J Wound Care. 2015;24(6):252-60.
  • De Caridi G, Massara M, Greco M, Pipitò N, Spinelli F, Grande R, et al. VAC therapy to promote wound healing after surgical revascularisation for critical lower limb ischaemia. Int Wound J. 2016;13(3):336-42.
  • Nain PS, Uppal SK, Garg R, Bajaj K, Garg S. Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2011;3(1):17-22.
  • Lavery LA, Barnes SA, Keith MS, Seaman JW, Armstrong DG. Prediction of healing for postoperative diabetic foot wounds based on early wound area progression. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(1):26-9.
  • Akbari A, Moodi H, Ghiasi F, Sagheb H, Rashidi H. Effects of vacuum-compression therapy on healing of diabetic foot ulcers: Randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Res Dev [Internet]. 2007;44(5):631-6. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17943674.
  • Lone AM, Zaroo MI, Laway BA, Pala NA, Bashir SA, Rasool A. Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective case-control study. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2014;5:23345.
  • Eginton MT, Brown KR, Seabrook GR, Towne JB, Cambria RA. A Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Negative-pressure Wound Dressings for Diabetic Foot Wounds. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17(6):645-9.
  • Blume P, Walters J, Payne W, Ayala J, Lantis J. Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Using Vacuum-Assisted Closure With Advanced Moist Wound Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(4):631-6.
  • Lavery, L A. Fontaine, J. Thakral, G. Kim, P J. Bhavan, K. Davis K. Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Negative- Pressure Wound Therapy Approaches with Low and High Pressure, Silicone- Coated Dressing, and Polyurethane Foam Dressing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):722-6.
  • Sepúlveda G, Espíndola M, Maureira M, Sepúlveda E, Fernández JI, Oliva C, et al. Curación asistida por presión negativa comparada con curación convencional en el tratamiento del pie diabético amputado. Ensayo clínico aleatorio. Cir Esp. 2009;86(3):171-7.
  • Etoz A, Ozgenel Y, Ozcan M. The use of negative pressure wound therapy on diabetic foot ulcers: a preliminary controlled trial. Wounds. 2004;16(8):264-9.
  • Karatepe O, Eken I, Acet E, Unal O, Mert M, Koc B, et al. Vacuum assisted closure improves the quality of life in patients with diabetic foot. Acta Chir Belg. 2016;111(5):298-302.
  • Yang S-L, Han R, Liu Y, Hu L-Y, Li X-L, Zhu L-Y. Negative pressure wound therapy is associated with up-regulation of bFGF and ERK1/2 in human diabetic foot wounds. Wound Repair Regen [Internet]. 2014;22(4):548-54. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24809625.
  • Apelqvist J, Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Boulton AJM. Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds. Am J Surg. junio de 2008;195(6):782-8.
  • Seidel D, Mathes T, Lefering R, Storck M, Lawall H, Neugebauer EAM. Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard wound care in chronic diabetic foot wounds: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:334.
  • Braakenburg A, Obdeijn MC, Feitz R, van Rooij I a LM, van Griethuysen AJ, Klinkenbijl JHG. The clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of the vacuum-assisted closure technique in the management of acute and chronic wounds: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(2):390-7.
  • Whitehead SJ, Forest-Bendien VL, Richard JL, Halimi S, Van GH, Trueman P. Economic evaluation of Vacuum Assisted Closure(R) Therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France. Int Wound J. 2011;8:22-32.
  • Trujillo-Martín M, García-Pérez L, Serrano-Aguilar P. Efectividad, seguridad y coste-efectividad de la terapia por presión negativa tópica para el tratamiento de las heridas crónicas: una revisión sistemática. Med Clin (Barc). 2011;137(7):321-8.
  • Driver VR, Blume PA. Evaluation of wound care and health-care use costs in patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy versus advanced moist wound therapy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014;104(2):147-53.
  • Trueman P. Cost-effectiveness considerations for home health V.A.C. Therapy in the United States of America and its potential international application. Int Wound J. 2008;5(2):23-6.
  • Hutton DW, Sheehan P. Comparative effectiveness of the SNaPTM Wound Care System. Int Wound J. 2011;8(2):196-205.
  • Lerman B, Oldenbrook L, Ryu J, Fong KD, Schubart PJ. The SNaP Wound Care System: a case series using a novel ultraportable negative pressure wound therapy device for the treatment of diabetic lower extremity wounds. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(4):825-30.
  • Atema JJ, Gans SL, Boermeester MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39(4):912-25.
  • Bruhin A, Ferreira F, Chariker M, Smith J, Runkel N. Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the open abdomen. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2014;12(10):1105-14. Disponible en: http://www.journal-surgery.net/article/S1743-9191(14)00881-4/pdf
  • Hyldig N, Birke-Sorensen H, Kruse M, Vinter C, Joergensen JS, Sorensen JA, et al. Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions. Br J Surg. 2016;103(5):477-86.
  • Kantak NA, Mistry R, Halvorson EG. A review of negative-pressure wound therapy in the management of burn wounds. Burns [Internet]. 2016; Disponible en: http://www.burnsjournal.com/article/S0305-4179(16)30182-6/pdf
  • Schlatterer DR, Hirschfeld AG, Webb LX. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Grade IIIB Tibial Fractures: Fewer Infections and Fewer Flap Procedures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(5):1802-11.
  • Shrestha BM. Systematic review of the negative pressure wound therapy in kidney transplant recipients. World J Transplant. 2016;6(4):767.
  • Guffanti A. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Wound, Ostomy Cont Nurs. 201416];41(3):233-7.
  • Zhang J, Hu Z-C, Chen D, Guo D, Zhu J-Y, Tang B. Effectiveness and safety of negative pressure wound therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:141-51.
Data source: Dialnet