Valoración y gestión del riesgo de reincidencia delictiva en menores infractoresuna revisión de instrumentos

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aebi, M., Plattner, B., Steinhausen, H. C. y Bessler, C. (2011). Predicting sexual and nonsexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offences. Sexual abuse, 24, 456-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210384634
• Aguilar, M. M. y Godoy, C. (2013). Niveles de empatía, inteligencia emocional e impulsividad de sujetos de régimen penitenciario abierto. En F. Expósito, I. Valor-Segura, M. Vilariño y A. Palmer (Eds.), Psicología jurídica aplicada a los problemas sociales (pp. 225-237). Santiago de Compostela, España: Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense.
• Amezcua, J. A., Pichardo, M. C. y Fernández, E. (2002). Importancia del clima social familiar en la adaptación personal y social de los adolescentes. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 55, 575-590.
• Andrés-Pueyo, A. y Echeburúa, E. (2010). Valoración del riesgo de violencia: instrumentos disponibles e indicaciones de aplicación. Psicothema, 22, 403-409.
• Andrés-Pueyo, A. y Redondo, S. (2007). Predicción de la violencia: entre la peligrosidad y la valoración del riesgo de violencia. Papeles del psicólogo, 28, 157-173.
• Andreu, J. M., Graña, J. L., Peña de la, M. E. y Ballesteros, A. (2013). Riesgo de violencia y psicopatía en distintas tipologías delictivas: un estudio empírico. Behavioral Psychology/ Psicología Conductual: Revista Internacional de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud, 21, 289-302.
• Andrews, D. A. y Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
• Andrews, D. A. y Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th Ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender.
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. y Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. y Wormith, J. S. (2011). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 735-755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811406356
• Augimeri, L. K., Koegl, C. J., Webster, C. D. y Levene, K. S. (2001). Early Assessment Risk List for Boys: EARL-20B (Version 2, Consultation Edition). Toronto, ON: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre.
• Baker, K., Jones, S., Merrington, S. y Roberts, C. (2005). Further development of Asset. London, UK: Youth Justice Board.
• Baker, K., Jones, S., Roberts, C. y Merrington, S. (2003). The evaluation of the validity and reliability of the youth justice board’s assessment for young offenders. London, UK: Youth Justice Board.
• Barudy J. (2000). Violencia agresiva y violencia ideológica en la fenomenología. En O. Vilches (Ed.), Violencia en la cultura: riesgos y estrategias de intervención (pp. 11-29). Santiago de Chile, Chile: Ediciones Sociedad Chilena de Psicología Clínica.
• Beech, A. R., Thornton, D., Tudway, J. A., Parish, R. J. H. y Print, B. (2004). Sexual recidivism in juvenile sexual offenders. Unpublished manuscript, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
• Blacker, J. (2009). The assessment of risk in intellectually disabled sexual offenders (tesis doctoral). University of Birmingham.
• Blacker, J., Beech, A. R., Wilcox, D. T. y Boer, D. P. (2011). The assessment of dynamic risk and recidivism in a sample of special needs sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903392376
• Boer, D. P., Tough, S. y Haaven, J. (2004). Assessment of risk manageability of intellectually disabled sex offenders. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14683148.2004.00214.x
• Borum, R., Bartel, P. y Forth, A. (2003). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth, Professional Manual. Oxford, UK: Pearson.
• Borum, R., Lodewikjs, H., Bartel, P. A. y Forth, A. E. (2010). Structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY). En R. K. Otto y K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment (pp. 63-73). New York, NY: Routledge Books.
• Caldwell, M. F., Ziemke, M. H. y Vitacco, M. J. (2008). An examination of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act as applied to juveniles: Evaluating the ability to predict sexual recidivism. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013241
• Catchpole, R. E. y Gretton, H. M. (2003). The predictive validity of risk assessment with violent young offenders: A 1-year examination of criminal outcome. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 688-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854803256455
• Chu, C. M., Ng, K., Fong, J. y Teoh, J. (2012). Assessing youth who sexually offended: The predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/ CMI in a non-Western context. Sexual Abuse, 24, 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211404250
• Contreras, L., Molina, V. y Cano, M. C. (2011). In search of psychosocial variables linked to the recidivism in young offenders. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 3, 77-88.
• Cortés, J. P., Lorca, C. y Vázquez, O. (2015). Sistema Integrado de Evaluación Diferenciada para Adolescentes y Jóvenes, SIED-AJ, desde el quehacer de programas de ejecución de sanciones de Corporación Opción. Trabajo Social, 88.
• Cuervo, K. y Villanueva, L. (2013). Reiteración y reincidencia delictiva en menores españoles con expediente judicial. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 30, 61-68.
• Cuervo, K., Villanueva, L., González, F., Carrión, C. y Busquets, P. (2015). Characteristics of young offenders depending on the type of crime, Psychosocial Intervention, 24, 9-15.
• Dahle, K. P., Janka, C., Gallasch-Nemitz, F. y Lehmann, R. (20 09). Tatcharakteristika, Rückfallrisiko und Rückfallprognose bei Sexualstraftätern vom Jugend-bis ins Seniorenalter. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 3, 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-009-0007-1
• DeLisi, M., Caudill, J. W., Trulson, C. R., Marquart, J. W., Vaughn, M. G. y Beaver, K. M. (2010). Angry inmates are violent Inmates: A Poisson regression approach to youthful offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 10, 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2010.489861
• Echeburúa, E., Muñoz-Vicente, J. M. y Loinaz, I. (2011). La evaluación psicológica forense frente a la evaluación clínica: propuestas y retos de futuro. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 141-159.
• Elkovitch, N., Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M. J. y Ullman, D. (2008). Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense: The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments. Behavioral sciences & the law, 26, 511-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.832
• Epperson, D. L. y Ralston, C. A. (2009, October). Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offender Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II (JSORRAT-II) in Iowa. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Dallas, TX.
• Epperson, D. L., Ralston C. A., Fowers, D., DeWitt, J. y Gore, K. S. (2006). Actuarial risk assessment with juveniles who offend sexually: Development of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II (JSORRAT-II). En D. Prescott (Ed.), Risk assessment of youth who have sexually abused: Theory, controversy, and emerging strategies (pp. 118-169). Oklahoma City, OK: Woods ‘N’ Barnes.
• Esbec, E. y Fernández, O. (2003). Valoración de la peligrosidad criminal (riesgo-violencia) en Psicología forense. Instrumentos de evaluación y perspectivas. Psicopatología Clínica, Legal y Forense, 3(2), 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4692
• Fazel, S., Singh, J., Doll, H. y Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people. Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 345, e4692. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4692
• Forth, A., Kosson, D. y Hare, R. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth version. Technical manual. New York, NY: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
• García-España, E., García, O., Benítez, M. J. y Pérez, F. (2011). Menores reincidentes y no reincidentes en el sistema de justicia juvenil andaluz. Alternativas, 18, 35-55. https://doi.org/10.14198/ALTERN2011.18.02
• Garrido-Genovés, V. (2009). La predicción y la intervención con los menores infractores: Un estudio en Cantabria. Gobierno de Cantabria. Santander.
• Garrido, V., López, E. y Galvis, M. J. (2017). Predicción de la reincidencia con delincuentes juveniles: adaptación del IGI-J. Revista sobre la infancia y la adolescencia, 12, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.4995/reinad.2017.6484
• Garrido, V., López, E. y Silva, T. (2006). Inventario de gestión e intervención para jóvenes IGI-J. En V. Garrido, E. López, T. Silva, M. López y P. Molina (Eds.), El modelo de competencia social de la ley de menores (pp. 227-245). Valencia, España: Tirant lo Blanch.
• González, L., Molinuevo, B., Pardo, Y. y Torrubia, R. (2003). Adaptación española autorizada del PCL:YV [Manual of the Spanish version of the Psychopathic Checklist: Youth version]. Barcelona, España: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
• Gossner, D. y Wormith, J. S. (2007). The prediction of recidivism among young offenders in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 5(1/2), 1-13.
• Graña, J. L., Andreu, J. M. y González, L. (2017). Diseño, desarrollo y y validación psicométrica del PREVI-A. Predicción del riesgo y valoración de la intervención en la ARRMI. Madrid, España: Comunidad de Madrid.
• Graña,J.L.,Garrido,V.J.yGonzález,L.(2007).Evaluacióndelascaracterísticas delictivas de menores infractores de la Comunidad de Madrid y su influencia en la planificación del tratamiento. Psicopatología Clínica Legal y Forense, 7(1), 7-18.
• Gretton, H. M., McBride, M., Hare, R. D., O’Shaughnessy, R. y Kumka, G. (2001). Psychopathy and recidivism in adolescent sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385480102800403
• Hanson, R. K. (2009). The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Canadian Psychology, 50, 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015726
• Hanson, R. K. y Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological assessment, 21, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0014421
• Hanson, R. K. y Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders, 2. Ottawa, ON: Solicitor General Canada. Retrieved from http://www.tacklingcrime.gc.ca
• Hare, R.D. (2003). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist (2nd edition). Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
• Harris, A., Phenix, A., Thornton, D., & Hanson, R. K. (2003). Static 99: Coding rules revised 2003. Ottawa, ON: Solicitor General Canada.
• Hecker, J., Scoular, J., Righthand, S. y Nangle, D. (2002). Predictive validity of the J-SOAP over 10-plus years: Implications for risk assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
• Hempel, I., Buck, N., Cima, M. y van Marle, H. (2013). Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders. What is next? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 208-228.
• Hoge, R. D. y Andrews, D. A. (2002). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) User’s manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
• Hoge, R. D., Vincent, G., Guy, L. y Illescas, S. R. (2015). Serie especial: La transición desde la delincuencia juvenil a la delincuencia adulta IV. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 13, 1-40.
• Howell, J. C. (1997). Juvenile justice and youth violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328003
• Howell, J. C. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency: A comprehensive framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Iborra, I., Rodríguez, A., Serrano, A. y Martínez, P. (2011). Situación del menor en la Comunitat Valenciana: víctima e infractor. Valencia, España: Centro Reina Sofía.
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística - INE. (2011). Estadística de menores condenados según número de infracciones penales, edad y sexo. Madrid, España: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Recuperado de http://www.ine.es
• Janus, E. A. y Meehl, P. E. (1997). Assessing the legal standard for predictions of dangerousness in sex offender commitment proceedings. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 33-64. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.3.1.33
• Kelly, W. R., Macy, T. S. y Mears, D. P. (2005). Juvenile referrals in Texas: An assessment of criminogenic needs and the gap between needs and services. The Prison Journal, 85, 467-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505281530
• Koegl, C. J., Augimeri, L. K., Ferrante, P., Walsh, M. y Slater, N. (2008). A Canadian programme for child delinquents. En R. Loeber, N. W. Slot, P. van der Laan y M. Hoeve (Eds.), Tomorrow’s criminals: The development of child delinquency and effective interventions (pp. 285-300). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
• Levene, K. S., Augimeri, L. K., Pepler, D. J., Walsh, M., Koegl, C. J. y Webster, C. D. (2001). Early Assessment Risk List for Girls: EARL-21G (Version 1, Consultation Edition). Toronto, ON: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre.
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
• Lodewijks, H. P., Doreleijers, T. A. y Ruiter de, C. (2008). Savry risk assessment in violent Dutch adolescents relation to sentencing and recidivism. Criminal justice and behavior, 35, 696-709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808316146
• Lofthouse, R. E., Lindsay, W. R., Totsika, V., Hastings, R. P., Boer, D. P. y Haaven, J. L. (2013). Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12029
• Mampaso, J., Pérez-Fernández, F., Corbí, B., González, M. y Bernabé, B. (2014). Factores de riegos y de protección en menores infractores. Análisis y prospectiva. Psychologia Latina, 5(1), 11-20.
• Martínez, R., Flores, J. y Rosenfeld, B. (2007). Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) in a sample of urban minority youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1284-1295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807301791
• McCoy, W. K. (2007). Predicting treatment outcome and recidivism among juvenile sex offenders: The utility of the JSOAP-II and ERASOR in an outpatient treatment program (tesis doctoral).
• Meyers, J. R., & Schmidt, F. (2008). Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) with juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 344-355.
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2009). MEGA: A new paradigm in protocol assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 2, 124-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361520902922434
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2010). MEGA: An ecological risk assessment tool of risk and protective factors for assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 19, 734-756. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2010.515542
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2013). MEGA: A new paradigm in risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth. Journal of family violence, 28, 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9527-8
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2016). MEGA: Cross-validation findings on sexually abusive females: Implications for risk assessment and clinical practice. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 903-911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9845-8
• Morton, K. E. (2003). Psychometric properties of four risk assessment measures with male adolescent sex offenders (Unpublished master’s thesis). Carleton University. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
• Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783-792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783
• Muñoz-Vicente, J. M. y López-Ossorio, J. J. (2016). Valoración psicológica del riesgo de violencia: alcance y limitaciones para su uso en el contexto forense. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 26, 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apj.2016.04.005
• Nelson, R. (2011). Predicting recidivism among juvenile sex offenders: The validity of the ERASOR (tesis doctoral no publicada). Roger Williams Univeristy. Bristol, RI.
• Nguyen, T. y Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2016). Validez predictiva del SVR-20 y la Static-99 en una muestra de agresores sexuales en Cataluña. Generalitat de Catalunya. Centre d’Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada.
• Parks, G. A. y Bard, D. E. (2006). Risk factors for adolescent sex offender recidivism: Evaluation of predictive factors and comparison of three groups based upon victim type. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320601800402
• Poole, D. (comp.) (2000). Unruly Order: Violence, Power, and Cultural Identity in the High Provinces of Southern Peru. Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Poole, D., Liedecke, D. y Marbibi, M. (2000). Risk assessment and recidivism in juvenile sexual offenders: A validation study of the Static-99. Austin, TX: Texas Youth Commission monograph.
• Powers-Sawyer, A. B. y Miner, M. H. (2009). Actuarial prediction of juvenile recidivism: The static variables of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II). Sexual Offender Treatment, 4(2), 1-11.
• Prentky, R. A., Li, N. C., Righthand, S., Schuler, A., Cavanaugh, D. y Lee, A. F. (2010). Assessing risk of sexually abusive behavior among youth in a child welfare sample. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(1), 24-45.
• Prentky, R. y Righthand, S. (2003). Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II). Manual. NCJ 202316. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.920
• Rajlic, G. y Gretton, H. M. (2010). An examination of two sexual recidivism risk measures in adolescent offenders: The moderating effect of offender type. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1066-1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810376354
• Ralston, C. A. (2008). Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University. Ames.
• Ralston, C. y Epperson, D. (2012). Validation of the JSORRAT-II in Iowa: Update and expansion. 31st Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Denver, CO.
• Real Academia Española. (2001). Diccionario de la lengua española (22ª ed.).
• Redondo, S. y Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2007). La psicología de la delincuencia. Papeles del Psicólogo, 28, 147-156.
• Rice, M. E. y Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
• Rojas, E. (2013). Violence risk assessment with youth who have sexually offended: A psychometric examination of the Violence Risk Scale: Youth Sexual Offender Version (VRS: YSO) (Doctoral dissertation).
• Rutter, M., Giller, H. y Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial behavior by young people: A major new review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Salekin, R. T. y Lynam, D. R. (2010). Child and adolescent psychopathy: An introduction. En R. T. Salekin y D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Schmidt, F., Hoge, R. D. y Gomes, L. (2005). Reliability and validity analyses of the youth level of service/case management inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804274373
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: a meta-analysis. Law and human behavior, 31, 449-462. https://doi.org/13671381.10.1007/s10979-006-9071-7
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2008). A meta-analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment instruments predictive validity by gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1367-1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808324377
• Silva, T. (2009). Medición de la psicopatía en el contexto del sistema de justicia juvenil en España. Universitat de Valencia, España.
• Skowron, C. (2004). Differentiation and predictive factors in adolescent sexual offending (tesis doctoral no publicada). Carleton University. Ottawa, Canada.
• Vallès, L. y Hilterman, E. (2006). SAVRY: Manual para la valoración estructurada de riesgo de violencia en jóvenes. Barcelona, España: Ed. Centre d’Estudis Jurídics i de Formació Especialitzada. Departament de Justicia. Generalitat de Catalunya.
• Vilariño, M., Amado, B. G. y Alves, C. (2013). Menores infractores: un estudio de campo de los factores de riesgo. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 23, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.5093/aj2013a7
• Viljoen, J. L., Elkovitch, N., Scalora, M. J. y Ullman, D. (2009). Assessment of reoffense risk in adolescents who have committed sexual offenses: Predictive validity of the ERASOR, PCL: YV, YLS/CMI, and Static-99. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 981-1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809340991
• Viljoen, J. L., Mordell, S. y Beneteau, J. L. (2012). Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: a meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093938
• Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M., Cuadra, L., Bader, S., Chávez, V., Ullman, D. y Lawrence, L. (2008). Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually offended: A comparison of the J-SOAP-II, J-SORRAT-II, and SAVRY. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807307521
• Villar-Torres, P., Luengo, M. A., Romero, E., Sobral, J. y Gómez-Fraguela, J. A. (2014). Assessing psychopathy in young people: the validity of the Psychopathic Checklist: Youth version for a sample of Spanish offenders. Psychology, Crime y Law, 20, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.885970
• Vincent, G. M., Chapman, J. y Cook, N. E. (2011). Risk-needs assessment in juvenile justice predictive validity of the SAVRY, racial differences, and the contribution of needs factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 42-62.
• Waite, D., Keller, A., McGarvey, E. L., Wieckowski, E., Pinkerton, R. y Brown, G. L. (2005). Juvenile sex offender re-arrest rates for sexual, violent nonsexual and property crimes: A 10-year follow-up. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320501700305
• Welsh, J. L., Schmidt, F., McKinnon, L., Chattha, H. K. y Meyers, J. R. (2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and incremental validity. Assessment, 15, 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107307966
• Wenger, L. y Andrés Pueyo, A. (2016). Tests forenses en español para evaluar adolescentes infractores. Papeles del Psicólogo, 37, 107-117.
• Wilson, E. y Hinks, S. (2011). Assessing the predictive validity of the Asset youth risk assessment tool using the Juvenile Cohort Study (JCS). London, UK: Crown.
• Worling, J. R. (2004). The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary psychometric data. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 235- 254. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600305
• Worling, J. R. (2013). Desistence for Adolescents who Sexually Harm (DASH-13). Documento no publicado. Retrieved from www.erasor.org
• Worling, J. R., Bookalam, D. y Litteljohn, A. (2012). Prospective validity of the estimate of risk of adolescent sexual offense recidivism (ERASOR). Sexual Abuse, 24, 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211407080
• Youth Justice Board. (2000). ASSET: Explanatory Notes. London, UK: Youth Justice Board.
• Zeng, G., Chu, C. M. y Lee, Y. (2015). Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in Singapore: Preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF. Sexual Abuse, 27, 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214561684