Eficiencia y productividad en las unidades de transferencia de resultados de investigación científica en México

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abrahms, I., Leung, G., Stevens, A., (2009). How U.S. Technology Transfer Offices Tasked and Motivated areIs It All about the Money? Research Management Review, 17(1), 1-34.
• Albornoz, O. (1997). La cuestión de la productividad, rendimiento y competitividad académica del personal docente y de investigación en América Latina y el Caribe. La educación superior en el siglo XXI. Una visión de América Latina y el Caribe, 1. Mimeo.
• Ali, A., Ahmad, B. (2013). Evaluating the efficiency of faculties in Qassim University. Using data envelopment analysis. In: Banker R., Emrouznejad, A., Bal, H., Alp, I., Ali. M. (2013). Data Envelopment Analysis and Performance Measurement. Samsun, Turkey: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of DEA, June.
• Agapitova, N., Holm-Nielsen, L., Vukmirovic, O. G. (2002). The evolution of science & technology: Latin America and the Caribbean in comparative perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank; Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office.
• Agarwal, R., Shah, S. (2014). Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Research Policy, 43, 1109-1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.012
• Agasisti, T.; Johnes, G. (2009). Beyond frontiers: comparing the efficiency of higher education decision-making units across more than one country. Education Economics, 17, 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290701523291
• Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
• Altamirano-Corro, A., Peniche-Vera, R. D. R. (2014). Metodología AED-RNA para la estimación de la eficiencia institucional: El caso de las dependencias de educación superior (DES) de ingeniería de México. Nova scientia, 6(12), 356-378. https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v6i12.59
• Anderson, T., Daim, T., Lavoie, F. (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation, 27, 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.003
• Antonio, A. C., Domingo, G. M., Humberto, B. O., Alvaro, L. L., Alvaro, L. R., Del Rocío, P. V. R. (2012). Measuring the institutional efficiency using data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy process: The case of a Mexican University. African Journal of Business Management, 6(50), 11923-11930. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.770
• Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34, 1113-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.009
• Autio, E., Laamanen, T. (1995). Measurement and evaluation of technology-transfer review of technology-transfer mechanisms and indicators. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7-8), 643-664.
• Becerril-Torres, O. U., Álvarez-Ayuso, I. C., Nava-Rogel, R. M. (2012). Frontera tecnológica y eficiencia técnica de la educación superior en México. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 17(54), 793-816.
• Belenzon, S., Schankerman, M., (2009). University knowledge transfer: private ownership, incentives, and local development objectives. Journal of Law and Economics 52(1), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.1086/595763
• Bok, Derek. (2003). Universities in the Marketplace: the Commercialization of Higher Education. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Bonaccorsi, A., Dario, C. (2004), Econometric approaches to the analysis of productivity of R&D systems. In: Moed, H., Glanzel, W., Schmoch, U. (Eds). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_3
• Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology Transfer and Public Policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
• Cáceres, H., Kristjanpoller, W., Tabilo, J. (2014). Analysis of Technical Efficiency and its Relation with Performance Evaluation Results in a Chilean University. Innovar, 24(54), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46720
• Caldera, A., Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39, 1160-1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.016
• Carlsson, B., Fridh, A. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 199-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-002-0105-0
• Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34, 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.007
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Inefficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Lewin, A., Seiford, L. (1994). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0637-5
• Cobert A., Levary, R., Shaner, M. C. (2000). Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 656-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00275-1
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The economic journal, 99(397), 569-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763
• Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R., Sampat, B. N. (2002). How Do University Inventions Get into Practice? Management Science, 48(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.61.14272
• CONACYT (2013). Programa Especial de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 2014-2018. México: CONACYT.
• Crow, M., Bozeman, B. (1998). Limited by Design: R&D Laboratories in the US National Innovation System. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Curi, C., Daraio, C., Llerena, P. (2015). The productivity of French technology transfer offices after government reforms. Applied Economics, 47(28), 3008-3019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1011318
• Debackere, K., Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 35, 321-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003
• Deutsch, J., Dumas, A., Silber, J. (2013). Estimating an educational production function for five countries of Latin America on the basis of the PISA data. Economics of Education Review, 36, 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. econedurev.2013.07.005
• Di Gregorio, D., and Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5
• Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of evolutionary economics, 4(3), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236366
• Dosi, G. (1997). Opportunities, incentives and the collective patterns of technological change. The economic journal, 107(444), 1530-1547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00064.x
• Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203216675
• Etzkowitz, H., Viale, R. (2010). Polyvalent knowledge and the Entrepreneurial University: A Third Academic Revolution? Critical Sociology, 36, 4.https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920510365921
• Fagerberg, J. (1994) Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXII, (September)
• Feller, I., Roessner, D. (1995). What does industry expect from university partnerships: congress wants to see bottom-line results from industry government programs, but that is not what the participating companies are seeking? Issues in Science and Technology, 12(1), 80.
• Feria, V., Hidalgo, A. (2011). Towards a transfer model of scientific and technological knowledge: the case of Mexico. In: Proceedings of the 20th IAMOT Conference. Miami.
• Fitzgerald, C., Cunningham, J. A. (2015). Inside the university technology transfer office: mission statement analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 1-12.
• Friedman, J., Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: do incentives, management and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021674618658
• Glass, J.C., McCallion, G., McKillop, D., Stringer, K. (2006). A ‘technically level playing field’ profit efficiency analysis of enforced competition between publicly funded institutions. European Economic Review, 50, 1601-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.10.011
• Golany, B., Thore, S. (1997). Restricted Best Practices Selection in DEA: An Overview with a Case Study Evaluating the Socio-Economic Performance of Nations. Annals of Operations Research 73(1), 117-140. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1018916925568
• Grilliches, Z. (1979), Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth, The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321
• Griliches, Z. (1986): Productivity, R&D and Basic Research at Firm Level, Is there still a relationship?. American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 1, p. 141-154.
• Grimaldi, R., Kenny, M., Siegel, D., Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40, 1045-1057 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005
• Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.008
• Güemes-Castorena, D. (2008). A DEA Decision Making Model for Higher Education Funding. The Case of Mexico’s Public State Universities. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Pub.
• Heher, A. D. (2005). Implications for technology Transfer Benchmarks for Developing Countries. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 4(3), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.4.3.207/1
• Heher A.D. (2006) Return on Investment in Innovation: Implications for Institutions and National Agencies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0002-z
• Heijs, J., & Buesa, M. (2016). Manual de economía de innovación. IAIF, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
• Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., Tracjtenberg, M. (1998).Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557221
• Kelley, M.R. (1997). From mission to commercial orientation: perils and possibilities for federal industrial technology policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(4), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124249701100404
• Kodde, D., Palm, F. (1986). Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica, 54(5), 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912331
• Lach, S., Schankerman, M. (2004). Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. Journal of European Economic Association, 2(2/3), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247604323067961
• Leitner, K., Prikoszovits, J., Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M., Stowasser, R., Wagner, K. (2007). The impact of size and specialization on universities’ department performance: a DEA analysis applied to Austrian universities. Higher Education, 53, 517-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-0002-9
• Lerner, J. (2005). The University and the startup: Lesson from the past two decades. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-004-4357-8
• Link, A. N., Scott, J. T., Siegel, D. S. (2003). The economics of intellectual property at universities: an overview of the special issue. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1217-1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167- 7187(03)00080-8
• Link, A. N., Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower’s door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34, 1106-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.015
• Lockett, A., Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34, 1043-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006
• Lynn, L.H., Reddy, N.M., Aram, J.D. (1996). Linking technology and institutions the innovation community framework. Research Policy, 25(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00817-5
• Mansfield, E. (1984): R&D and Innovation Some Empirical Findings. En: R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• Marshall, E., Shortle, J. (2005). Using DEA and VEA to Evaluate Quality of Life in the Mid-Atlantic States. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 34(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500008352
• McDevitt, V. L., Mendez-Hinds, J., Winwood, D., Nijhawan, V., Sherer, T., Ritter, J. F., Sanberg, P. R. (2014). More than money: The exponential impact of academic technology transfer. Technology and innovation, 16(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3727/194982414X13971392823479
• McMillan, M. L., Chan, W. H. (2006). University efficiency: A comparison and consolidation of results from stochastic and non-stochastic methods, Education Economics, 14, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290500481857
• Meeusen, W., Van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525757
• Monteiro, A. (2013). The Efficiency of Portuguese Techonology Transfer Offices and the Importance of Universities Characteristics. Master Thesis. Universidade do Porto.
• Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., Ziedonis, A. (2015). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Necoechea-Mondragón, H., Pineda-Domínguez, D., Soto-Flores, R. (2013). A Conceptual Model of Technology Transfer for Public Universities in Mexico. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(4), 24-35. https://doi. org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000500002
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1974). Neoclassical vs. evolutionary theories of economic growth: critique and prospectus. The Economic Journal, 84(336), 886-905. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230572
• Nelson R., Winter, Sidney, G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.
• Nelson, R. R. (2009). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA., Harvard University Press.
• Nerkar, A., Shane, S. (2003). When do start-ups that exploit patented academic Knowledge survive? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1391-1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00088-2
• Nonaka, I. (2008). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review Press.
• O’Kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., Fitzgerald, C., (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44, 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003
• O’Shea, R., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34, 994-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
• Phan, P.H., Siegel, D.S. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned from qualitative and quantitative research in the US and UK. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2, 66-144. https://doi. org/10.1561/0300000006
• Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago press.
• Powers, J. B., McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 291-311. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008
• Reichmann, G. (2004). Measuring university library efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Libri, 54, 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2004.136
• Roessner, J.D., Wise, A. (1994). Public-policy and emerging sources of technology and technical-information available to industry. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb01473.x
• Rogers, E., Yin, J., Hoffman, J. (2000). Assesing the effectiveness of Technology Transfer Offices at US Research Universities. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 12, 47-80.
• Rossi, F. (2014). The efficiency of universities’ knowledge transfer activities: A multi-output approach beyond patenting and licensing. CIMR Working Papers. No. 16. University of London.
• Saxenian, A. L. (1996). Regional Advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston: Harvard University Press.
• Scherer, F. M. (1986). Innovation and growth: Schumpeterian perspectives. MIT Press Books, 1.
• Schilling, M. A. (2010). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. (3rd Ed.) New York: Mc Graw Hill.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1950): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, Harper & Row, 1950
• Shane, S. (2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47, 205-220. https://doi. org/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837
• Shane, S. (2004a). Academic Entrepreneurship; University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Shane, S. (2004b). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00114-3
• Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
• Siegel, D., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., Link, A.N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
• Siegel, D.S., Phan, P.H., (2004.) Analyzing the Effectiveness of UniversityTechnology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education. Working Paper No. 0426. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
• Siegel D., Wright, M. (2007). Intellectual property: the assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 529- 540. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm033
• Siegel, D., Wright, M., Chapple, W., Lockett, A. (2008). Assesing the relative performance of University Technology Transfer in the US and UK: A Stochastic Distance Function Approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(7-8), 717-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590701785769
• Stephan, Paula, (2012). How Economics Shapes Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674062757
• Storper, M. (1995). Regional technology coalitions: an essential dimension of national technology policy. Research Policy, 24(6), 895-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00810-8
• Teece, D. J. (1992). Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 18(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90050-L
• Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007884111883
• Thursby, J. G., Kemp S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31, 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8
• Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
• Trune D., Goslin L. (1998). University Technology transfer programs a profit/loss analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 57, 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(97)00165-0
• Tseng, A. A., Raudensky, M. (2014). Performance evaluations of technology transfer offices of major US research universities. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008
• Valdez-Lafarga, C., Balderrama, J. I. L. (2015). Efficiency of Mexico’s regional innovation systems: an evaluation applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 7(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.979652
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180. https://doi. org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
• Worthington, C.; Lee, B. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003, Economics of Education Review, 27, 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.09.012
• Wright, M., Birley, S., Mosey, S. (2004a). Entrepreneurship and University Technology Transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034121.02507.f3
• Wright, M.; Vohora, A., Lockett, A. (2004b). The Formation of High-Tech University Spinouts: The Role of Joint Ventures and Venture Capital Investors. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034124.70363.83
• Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. London: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847205575
• Zhang, D., Banker, R. D., Li, X., Liu, W. (2011). Performance impact of research policy at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Research Policy, 40(6), 875-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.010