Un marco de análisis para la adopción de sistemas de gestión de aprendizaje en las universidades

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alkhalaf, S., Drew, S., AlGhamdi, R., Alfarraj, O. (2012). “E-Learning system on higher education institutions in KSA: attitudes and perceptions of faculty members”. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 47, pp. 1199 – 1205.
• Aubert, P., Caroli, E., & Muriel, R. (2006). “New Technologies, Organisation and Age, Firm-Level Evidence”. The Economic Journal, 116, F73-F93.
• Bashein, B.J., Markus, M.L. and Riley, P. (1994), “Preconditions for BPR success and how to prevent failures”, Information Systems Management, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 7-13.
• Basole R.C., Seuss C.D., Rouse W.B. (2012). “IT innovation adoption by enterprises: Knowledge discovery through text analytics”. Decision Support Systems, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.029.
• Bujak, K.R.; P.M.A. Baker; R. DeMillo and F. D. Sandulli (2012), “The Evolving University: Beyond Disruptive Change and Institutional Innovation”. Communication to IPSA Madrid.
• Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1961), The Management of Innovation, Tavistock Institute, London.
• Chrusciel, D. and Field, D.W. (2006), “Success factors in dealing with significant change in an organization”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 503-16.
• Coates, H., James, R. & Baldwin, G. (2005), “A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning”, Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 11 No 1, pp. 19-36.
• Czara, S.J., Hammond, K., Blascovich, J.I, & Swede, H. (1989), “Age related differences in learning to use a text-editing system”. Behavior and Information Technology, 8(4), 309-319.
• Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J.D., Dziuban, C. (2013), ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology (Research Report), Louisville, CO. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research.
• Dalhman, C. (2007), “The Challenge of the Knowledge Economy for Latin America”. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability-Georgetown University/Universia, 1(1), pp. 18-46.
• DeMillo, R. A. (2011). Abelard to Apple: Fate of American Colleges and Universities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• De Smet, C., Bourgonjon, J., De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M. (2012) “Researching instructional use and the technology acceptation of learning management systems by secondary school teachers”. Computers & Education vol. 58, pp. 688–696.
• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, pp. 127-60.
• Eksheir, K.; Zualkernan, A. and Mohamad M. (2012), “Adoption of a Learning Management System: A Case Study in the Higher Education”, EDULEARN12 Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain. pp. 6816-6820.
• Fillion, G.. and Booto Ekionea, J.P. (2012), “Integrating ICT into Higher Education at the University of Moncton: A Study of Onsite vs Online Students’ Perceptions”, Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Volume 16, Number 4, pp. 65-86.
• Galliers, R. and Baets, W.R.J. (1998), Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: Innovation for the 21st Century Organization, Wiley, Chichester.
• Gunes, A.; Altintas, T. (2012), “Evaluation of Distance Education Components: A Case Study of Associate Degree Programs”. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Volume 16, Number 3, pp. 23-34.
• Hannon, P. D. (2013). “Why is the Entrepreneurial University Important?”. Journal of Innovation Management, 1(2), 10-17.
• Hong, S.-J., Thong, J. Y. L., and Tam, K. Y. (2006) “Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet.” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 1819-1834.
• Hussenot, A. (2008), “Between structuration and translation: an approach of ICT appropriation”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 335-47.
• Islam, A.K.M. (2012), “The Determinants of the Post-Adoption Satisfaction of Educators with an E-Learning System”, Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 22(4), pp. 319-330.
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., and Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
• Kang, Y. S., Hong, S., and Lee, H. (2009) “Exploring continued online service usage behaviour: The roles of self-image congruity and regret.” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 111-122.
• Kim B. (2010) An empirical investigation of mobile data service continuance: Incorporating the theory of planned behavior into expectation-confirmation model. Expert Systems with Applications 37(10), 7033-7039.
• Korupp, S. E., & Szydlik, M., (2005). “Causes and trends of the Digital Divide”. European Sociological Review, 21, 409-422.
• Kraatz, M.S. and Zajac, E.J. (1996), “Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: the causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, pp. 812-36.
• Koszalka, T. A., & Ganesan, R. (2004). “Designing online courses: a taxonomy to guide strategic use of features available in course management systems (CMS) in distance education”. Distance Education, vol. 25, pp. 243–256.
• Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Lee M.C. (2010) Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectationconfirmation model. Computers & Education 54(2), 506-516.
• Lewin, A.Y., Weigelt, C.B. and Emery, J.D. (2004), “Adaptation and selection in strategy and change: perspectives on strategic change in organizations”, in Poole, M.S. and Van de Ven, A.H. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, Oxford University Press, London, pp. 108-59.
• Limayem M., Hirt S.G., Cheung C.M.K. (2007) “How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance”. MIS Quarterly vol. 31(4), pp. 705-737.
• Lin, W.S., Wang, C.H. (2012). “Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit”. Computers & Education, vol. 58, pp. 88–99.
• Lin, C. S., Wu, S., and Tsai, R. J. (2005) “Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation–confirmation model for web portal context.” Information & Management, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 683-693.
• Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). “Saving time or innovating practice: investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems”. Computers & Education, vol. 53, pp. 686–694.
• Luhmann, N. (1995), Social Systems, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
• Luhmann, N. (1998), Observations on Modernity, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
• McKinney, V., Yoon, K., and Zahedi, F. M. (2002) “The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: an expectation-disconfirmation approach.” Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 296-315.
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, pp. 340-63.
• Moore G.C., Benbasat I. (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perception of adopting an information technology innovation. Information System Research 2(3), 192-222.
• Oh K.Y., Cruickshank D., Anderson A. (2009) The adoption of e-trade innovations by Korean small and medium sized firms, Technovation 29(2), 110-121.
• Perrow, C. (1970), Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
• Recker, J. (2010), “Continued use of process modelling grammars: the impact of individual difference factors.” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 76-92.
• Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). “Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM”. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, pp. 1632–1640.
• Scott, W.R. (2003), Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open System, 5th, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
• Sorebo, O., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F. and Kristiansen, R. (2009), “The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology”, Computers & Education, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 1177-1187.
• Sorebo, O., and Eikebrokk, T. R. (2008) “Explaining IS continuance in environments where usage is mandatory.” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 2357-2371.
• Sutherland, L. & Markauskaite, L. (2012), “Examining the role of authenticity in supporting the development of professional identity: an example from teacher education”, Higher Education vol. 64, pp. 747–766.
• Tao, T.-H., Cheng, C.-J., and Sun, S.-Y. (2009) “What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience.” Computers & Education, Vol. 53, pp. 929-939.
• Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, S.-J., and Tam, K. Y. (2006) “The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation–confirmation model for information technology continuance.” International Journal of Human–Computer studies, Vol. 64, No. 9, pp. 799-810.
• Tompson, J.D. (1967), Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
• Tornatzky L.G., Fleischer M. (1990) The Processes of Technological Innovation, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
• Touron, D. R., Hoyer, W. J., & Cerella, J. (2004). “Cognitive skill learning, Age-related differences in the component processes of cognitive skill learning”. Psychology and Aging, 19(4), 565-580.
• Tubin, D. (2007), “When ICT meets schools: differentiation, complexity and adaptability”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 8-32.
• Van Raaij, E., & Schepers, J. (2008). “The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China”. Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 838–852.
• Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2), 186-204.
• Walker, H.J., Armenakis, A.A. and Bernerth, J.B. (2007), “Factors influencing organizational change efforts: an integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 761-73.
• Wang Y.M., Wang Y.S., Yang Y.F. (2010) Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77(5), 803-815.
• Washsburn, A. (2012), “A Correlational Analysis of Online Learning and the Transformational Leadership style”, The Business Review, Vol. 20, Num. 1, Summer, pp. 56-61.
• Weller, M. (2010). “The centralization dilemma in educational IT”. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, vol. 1, pp. 1–9.
• Wixom B.H., Todd P.A. (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research 16(1), 85-102.
• Woodward, J. (1965), Industrial Organization Theory and Practice, Oxford University, London.
• Zanjani, N., Nykvist, S.S., & Geva, S. (2013). “What makes an LMS effective : a synthesis of current literature”. 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 6-8th May, 2013, Aachen, Germany.