Primeros hallazgos con perimetría pulsar en pacientes hipertensos oculares
- Ana M. Fernández-Vidal 1
- Julián García Feijoo 1
- Marta González Hernández 2
- Manuel González de la Rosa 3
- Julián García Sánchez 4
- 1 Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid)
-
2
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
info
-
3
Universidad de La Laguna
info
-
4
Universidad de Salamanca
info
ISSN: 0365-6691
Año de publicación: 2002
Volumen: 77
Número: 6
Páginas: 321-326
Tipo: Artículo
Otras publicaciones en: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia
Resumen
Purpose To evaluate our first results with Pulsar perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension and compare them with normal individuals. Methods We studied 34 eyes of patients with ocular hypertension and normal G1 Octopus perimetry (mean age: 57.29 S.D. 10.55) and 41 eyes of normal individuals (mean age: 48.34 S.D. 13.71). A complete ophthalmologic examination, including Dr. González de la Rosa's Pulsar perimetry with TOP strategy, was performed for all patients. Exclusion criteria: visual acuity <0.8, refractive defect 3 spheric dp or 1.5 astigmatic dp, pupil size <3 mm, ocular surgery or pathologies, non-controlled diabetes or neurological diseases. They all had previous perimetric experience. Results were analyzed with student t - test. Results For normal individuals, mean sensitivity (MS) for Pulsar perimetry was 21,25 src (spatial resolution and contrast units) with an S.D. of 2,70. Mean defect (MD) was 0,93 src S.D. 1,80 and loss variance (LV) was 6,11 src S.D. 4,30. For patients with ocular hypertension: MS was 18,65 src S.D. 2,79; MD was 2,73 src S.D. 2,30 and LV was 8,46 src S.D. 5,01. LV differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.05) with 95% confidence limits of (-4.49; -0.20), and MS and MD differences, highly significant (p<0.01), with 99% confidence limits of (+0.92; +4.28;) and (-3.05; -0.54) respectively. Conclusions Pulsar perimetry may have greater sensibility for the detection of early defects in patients with ocular hypertension than conventional perimetry (Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2002; 77: 321-326).