Primeros hallazgos con perimetría pulsar en pacientes hipertensos oculares

  1. Ana M. Fernández-Vidal 1
  2. Julián García Feijoo 1
  3. Marta González Hernández 2
  4. Manuel González de la Rosa 3
  5. Julián García Sánchez 4
  1. 1 Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid)
  2. 2 Hospital Universitario de Canarias
    info

    Hospital Universitario de Canarias

    San Cristóbal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05qndj312

  3. 3 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

  4. 4 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Año de publicación: 2002

Volumen: 77

Número: 6

Páginas: 321-326

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Resumen

Purpose To evaluate our first results with Pulsar perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension and compare them with normal individuals. Methods We studied 34 eyes of patients with ocular hypertension and normal G1 Octopus perimetry (mean age: 57.29 S.D. 10.55) and 41 eyes of normal individuals (mean age: 48.34 S.D. 13.71). A complete ophthalmologic examination, including Dr. González de la Rosa's Pulsar perimetry with TOP strategy, was performed for all patients. Exclusion criteria: visual acuity <0.8, refractive defect 3 spheric dp or 1.5 astigmatic dp, pupil size <3 mm, ocular surgery or pathologies, non-controlled diabetes or neurological diseases. They all had previous perimetric experience. Results were analyzed with student t - test. Results For normal individuals, mean sensitivity (MS) for Pulsar perimetry was 21,25 src (spatial resolution and contrast units) with an S.D. of 2,70. Mean defect (MD) was 0,93 src S.D. 1,80 and loss variance (LV) was 6,11 src S.D. 4,30. For patients with ocular hypertension: MS was 18,65 src S.D. 2,79; MD was 2,73 src S.D. 2,30 and LV was 8,46 src S.D. 5,01. LV differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.05) with 95% confidence limits of (-4.49; -0.20), and MS and MD differences, highly significant (p<0.01), with 99% confidence limits of (+0.92; +4.28;) and (-3.05; -0.54) respectively. Conclusions Pulsar perimetry may have greater sensibility for the detection of early defects in patients with ocular hypertension than conventional perimetry (Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2002; 77: 321-326).