The citation from patents to scientific output revisitedReA new approach to Patstat /Scopus matching

  1. Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote 1
  2. Rodrigo Sánchez-Jiménez 2
  3. Félix De-Moya-Anegón 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Extremadura
    info

    Universidad de Extremadura

    Badajoz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0174shg90

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  3. 3 SCImago Research Group, España
Show affiliations +
Journal:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Year of publication: 2019

Issue Title: Uso de información académica

Volume: 28

Issue: 4

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2019.JUL.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: El profesional de la información

Abstract

Patents include citations, both to other patents and to documents that are not patents (NPL, Non-patent literature). Non-patent literature (NPL) includes articles published in scientific journals. The technological impact of scientific works can be studied through the citations they receive from patents, just like the scientific impact of articles can be analyzed through the citations. The NPL references included in patents are far from being standardized, so determining which scientific article they refer to is not a trivial task. This paper presents a procedure for linking the NPL references of the patents collected in the Patstat database and the scientific works indexed in the Scopus bibliographic database. This procedure consists of two phases: a broad generation of candidate couples and another phase of validation of couples, and it has been implemented with reasonably good results at a low cost.

€ View funding

Funding information

This work has been funded by the State Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation 2013-2016 and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) as part of the CSO2016-75031-R project.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Archambault, Éric; Campbell, David; Gingras, Yves; Larivière, Vincent (2009). “Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Jasist), v. 60, n. 7, pp. 1320-1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062
  • Coffano, Monica; Tarasconi, Gianluca (2014). Crios Patstat database: Sources, contents and access rules. Center for Research on Innovation, Organization and Strategy, Crios Working Paper n. 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2404344 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2404344
  • De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; Corera-Álvarez, Elena; Muñoz-Fernández, Francisco-José; González-Molina, Antonio; Herrero-Solana, Víctor (2007). “Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach”. Scientometrics, v. 73, n. 1, pp. 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4
  • De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; López-Illescas, Carmen; Moed, Henk F. (2018). “Statistical relationships between corresponding authorship, international co-authorship and citation impact of national research systems”. Journal of informetrics, v. 12, n. 4, pp. 1251-1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.004
  • De-Rassenfosse, Gaétan; Dernis, Hélène; Boedt, Geert (2014). “An introduction to the Patstat database with example queries”. Australian economic review, v. 47, n. 3, pp. 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12073
  • Derwent (2000). World Patents Index Derwent patentee codes, Revised edition 8. Thomson Corporation. Leuven Manual. ISBN: 0 901157 38 4 http://ips.clarivate.com/m/pdfs/mgr/patenteecodes.pdf
  • Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations”. Research policy, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  • European Patent Office (2018). Data catalog Patstat global. Versión 5.11. EPO Patstat customers. https://www.epo.org
  • Gorraiz, Juan; Gumpenberger, Christian; Wieland, Martin (2011). “Galton 2011 revisited: a bibliometric journey in the footprints of a universal genius”. Scientometrics, v. 88, n. 2, pp. 627-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0393-y
  • Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2015). “Analysis of scientific production in food science from 2003 to 2013”. Journal of food science, v. 80, n. 12, R2619-R2626. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13108
  • Hane, Paula J. (2004). “Elsevier announces Scopus service”. Information today. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16494
  • Jacsó, Péter (2011). “The h-index, h-core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database”. Online information review, v. 35, n. 3, pp. 492-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111151487
  • Jefferson, Osmat A.; Jaffe, Adam; Ashton, Doug; Warren, Ben; Koellhofer, Deniz; Dulleck, Uwe; Bilder, G.; Ballagh, Aaron; Moe, John; DiCuccio, Michael; Ward, Karl; Bilder, Geoff; Dolby, Kevin; Jefferson, Richard A. (2018). “Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation”. Nature biotechnology, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0818-772a
  • Kang, Byeongwoo; Tarasconi, Gianluca (2016). “Patstat revisited: Suggestions for better usage”. World patent information, v. 46, pp. 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2016.06.001
  • Leydesdorff, Loet; De-Moya Anegón, Félix; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P. (2010). “Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 2, pp. 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21250
  • Lissoni, Francesco (2012). “Academic patenting in Europe: an overview of recent research and new perspectives”. World patent information, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2012.03.002
  • Lotti, Francesca; Marin, Giovanni (2013). “Matching of Patstat applications to AIDA firms: Discussion of the methodology and results”. Bank of Italy occasional paper, n. 166. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2283111 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2283111
  • Magerman, Tom; Van-Looy, Bart; Song, Xiaoyan (2006). Data production methods for harmonized patent statistics: Patentee name standardization. Technical report, K.U. Leuven. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3888793/5836029/KS-AV-06-002-EN.PDF
  • Maraut, Stéphane; Martínez, Catalina (2014). “Identifying author–inventors from Spain: methods and a first insight into results”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 1, pp. 445-476.
  • Pickering, Bobby (2004). “Elsevier prepares Scopus to rival ISI Web of science”. Information world review, n. 8.
  • Raffo, Julio D.; Lhuillery, Stéphane (2009). “How to play the ‘Names game’: Patent retrieval comparing different heuristics”. Research policy, v. 38, n. 10, pp. 1617-1627. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1441172
  • Schoen, Anja; Heinisch, Dominik; Buenstorf, Guido (2014). “Playing the ‘Name game’ to identify academic patents in Germany”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 1, pp. 527-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1400-x
  • Thoma, Grid; Torrisi, Salvatore (2007). Creating powerful indicators for innovation studies with approximate matching algorithms. A test based on Patstat and Amadeus databases (No. 211). KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Università Bocconi, Milano, Italy. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? doi=10.1.1.573.8107&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Data source: Dialnet