Emoticons in transational and interactional exchangessocial networking chitchat versus working negotiation

  1. Carmen Maíz-Arévalo
Revista:
Odisea: Revista de estudios ingleses

ISSN: 1578-3820

Año de publicación: 2016

Número: 17

Páginas: 19-35

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Odisea: Revista de estudios ingleses

Resumen

En general, los emoticonos se asocian a contextos de carácter informal (mails informales, chats, redes sociales, etc.). En estos géneros, predomina la función interactiva del lenguaje incluso cuando hay cierta transacción. Esto nos lleva a plantearnos si los emoticonos tienen las misma frecuencia de uso y sirven para desempeñar las mismas funciones en aquellos intercambios mediados por ordenador de carácter más formal. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar el uso de los emoticonos en dos bases de datos: una de carácter interactivo frente a otra transaccional y ver si la frecuencia de uso y las funciones desempeñadas son equiparables.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BARON, N. S. 2004. “See you Online Gender Issues in College Student Use of Instant Messaging”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23, IV: 397–423.
  • BROWN, G. & G. YULE. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • CARRETERO, M., C. MAÍZ–ARÉVALO, C. AND MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, M.A. 2014. “’Hope this helps!’ An analysis of expressive speech acts in online task– oriented interaction by university students.” Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms Ed J Romero Trillo Berlin: Springer and Verlag. 261–289.
  • CRYSTAL, D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • DARICS, E. 2010. “Politeness in computer–mediated discourse of a virtual team.” Journal of Politeness Research 6, I: 129–150.
  • DERKS, DAANTJE, E.R. ARIJAN E.R. BOS AND J. VON GRUMBKOW. 2004. “Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context”. Computers in Human Behaviour 23: 842–849.
  • DERKS, DAANTJE, AGNETA H. FISCHER AND ARJAN E. R. BOS. 2008. “The role of emotion in computer–mediated communication: A review”. Computers in Human Behaviour 24: 766–785.
  • DRESNER, E. AND S. C. HERRING. 2010. “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force”. Communication Theory 20: 249–268.
  • FOX, A. B., ET AL. 2007. “The Medium Makes a Difference Gender Similarities and Differences in Instant Messaging”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26, IV: 389–397.
  • GOLATO, A. AND C. TALEGHANI–NIKAZM. 2006. “Negotiation of face in web chats”. Multilingua–Journal of Cross–Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 25, III: 293–321.
  • HANCOCK, J.T. 2004. “Verbal irony use in face–to–face and computer–mediated conversations.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23, IV: 447–463.
  • HAUGH, M. & D. BOUSFIELD. 2012. “Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English”. Journal of Pragmatics 44, IX: 1099–1114.
  • HERRING, S. C. 2003. “Computer–Mediated Discourse.” Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Eds. D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin and H. Hamilton. Oxford: Blackwell. 612–634.
  • HUFFAKER, D. A. AND S. L. CALVERT. 2005. “Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs”. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 10, II: 00–00.
  • KOZINETS, R. V. 2010. Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage Publications.
  • LEE, C. 2003. “How does instant messaging affect interaction between the genders.” Stanford, CA: The Mercury Project for Instant Messaging Studies at Stanford University. 11 October. 2013. http://web.stanford.edu/class/pwr3–25/group2/pdfs/ IM_Genders.pdf
  • LO, S. K. 2008. “The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer– mediated communication”. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11, V: 595–597.
  • MAÍZ–ARÉVALO, C. 2014. “A pragmatic and multimodal analysis of emoticons and gender in social networks.” Academia.edu. 30 November. 2014. https://www. academia.edu/Documents/in/Emoticons
  • MAÍZ–ARÉVALO, C. 2012. “”Was that a compliment?’ Implicit compliments in English and Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics 44, VIII: 980–996.
  • MAÍZ–ARÉVALO, C. 2013. “Just click ‘Like”’: Computer–mediated responses to Spanish compliments”. Journal of Pragmatics 51: 47–67.
  • MAÍZ–ARÉVALO, C. AND C. SANTAMARÍA GARCÍA. 2013. “Hibridismo entre el lenguaje oral y escrito”. Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos. Dossier: Cultura y nuevas tecnologías, 761: 69–85.
  • SEARLE, J. R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
  • YUS, F. 2011. Cyberpragmatics: internet–mediated communication in context Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • YUS, F. 2014. “Not all emoticons are created equal.” Academia. 2 December. 2014. https://www.academia.edu/6758152/Not_all_emoticons_are_created_equal