Cutoff scores for workplace bullying: The Spanish Short-Negative Acts Questionnaire (S-NAQ)

  1. José M. León-Pérez 1
  2. Iván Sánchez-Iglesias 2
  3. Alfredo Rodríguez-Muñoz 2
  4. Guy Notelaers 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  3. 3 University of Bergen
    info

    University of Bergen

    Bergen, Noruega

    ROR https://ror.org/03zga2b32

Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915,  1886-144X

Ano de publicación: 2019

Volume: 31

Número: 4

Páxinas: 482-490

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Psicothema

Resumo

Antecedentes: el acoso psicológico en el trabajo es un estresor laboral severo de origen social. Sin embargo, en el contexto español, hay escasez de medidas que nos permitan diagnosticar de forma fiable si una persona está siendo objeto de acoso. Método: se informa de las propiedades psicométricas, la estructura factorial y los puntos de corte del Cuestionario Breve de Actos Negativos (S-NAQ) en una muestra española (N = 1.409). Resultados: el S-NAQ presenta unas buenas propiedades psicométricas. Los análisis factoriales exploratorios y confirmatorios revelan que la escala tiene una única dimensión. Los datos de las curvas ROC indican dos puntos de corte que nos permiten categorizar a las personas como “no expuestas a conductas de acoso” (puntuaciones menores de 15), “en riesgo de ser acosadas” (puntuaciones entre 15 y 22), o “víctimas de acoso” (puntuaciones mayores de 22). Conclusiones: estos puntos de corte pueden facilitar el diagnóstico de acoso y servir para diseñar intervenciones según cada categoría

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

This research was supported by grant PSI2017-83465-P by the Spanish Department of Science and Innovation (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agervold, M. (2007). Bullying at work: A discussion of definitions and prevalence, based on an empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 161-172. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00585.x
  • Bjørkelo, B., Einarsen, S., Nielsen, M. B., & Matthiesen, S. B. (2011). Silence is golden? Characteristics and experiences of self-reported whistleblowers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(2), 206-238. doi:10.1080/13594320903338884
  • Chau, P. Y. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28, 309-334. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x
  • Conway, P. M., Høgh, A., Nabe-Nielsen, K., Grynderup, M. B., Mikkelsen, E. G., Persson, R., ... & Hansen, Å. M. (2018). Optimal cut-off points for the Short-Negative Act Questionnaire and their association with depressive symptoms and diagnosis of depression. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 62(3), 281-294. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxx105
  • DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). Mardia’s multivariate skew (b1p) and multivariate kurtosis (b2p) [SPSS macro]. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~ld208
  • Einarsen, S., & Nielsen, M. B. (2015). Workplace bullying as an antecedent of mental health problems: A five-year prospective and representative study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 88(2), 131-142. doi:10.1007/s00420-014-0944-7
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24-44. doi:10.1080/02678370902815673
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H.Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 3-40). London: CRC Press.
  • Eriksen, T.L. M., Hogh, A., & Hansen, Å. M. (2016). Long-term consequences of workplace bullying on sickness absence. Labour Economics, 43, 129-150. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2016.06.008
  • Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, Á., Gómez-Benito, J., & Zapf, D. (2010). Development and validation of the workplace bullying scale EAPA-T. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(3), 519-539.
  • Eurofound (2015). European Working Conditions Survey. Data available at: Https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-working-conditionssurveys
  • Giorgi, G., Leon-Perez, J. M., & Arenas, A. (2015). Are bullying behaviors tolerated in some cultures? Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between workplace bullying and job satisfaction among Italian workers. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(1), 227-237. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2266-9
  • Goldberg, D. P., Gater, R., Sartorius, N., Ustun, T. B., Piccinelli, M., Gureje, O., & Rutter, C. (1997). The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine, 27(1), 191-197. doi:10.1017/S0033291796004242
  • Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). General health questionnaire (GHQ). Swindon, Wiltshire, UK: NferNelson.
  • Gómez-Benito, J., Sireci, S., Padilla, J. L., Hidalgo, M. D., & Benítez, I. (2018). Differential Item Functioning: Beyond validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema, 30, 104-109.
  • Gupta, R., Bakhshi, A., & Einarsen, S. (2017). Investigating workplace bullying in India: Psychometric properties, validity, and cutoff scores of negative acts questionnaire–revised. Sage Open, 7(2), 1-12. doi:10.1177/2158244017715674.
  • Hogh, A., Clausen, T., Bickmann, L., Hansen, A. M., Conway, P. M., & Baernholdt, M. (2019). Consequences of workplace bullying for individuals, organizations and society. In P. D’Cruz, E. Noronha, G.Notelaers, & C. Rayner (Eds.), Concepts, Approaches and Methods. Handbooks of Workplace Bullying, Emotional Abuse and Harassment. Singapore: Springer.
  • Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
  • Hutchinson, M., Bradbury, J., Browne, G., & Hurley, J. (2017). Determining the optimal cut-off scores for the Workplace Bullying Inventory. Nurse Researcher, 25(3), 46-50. doi:10.7748/nr.2017.e1543
  • Kelley, K., & Lai, K. (2012). MBESS: MBESS. R package version 3.3.2. [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MBESS
  • Leon-Perez, J. M., Escartín, J., & Giorgi, G. (2019). The presence of workplace bullying and harassment worldwide. In P. D’Cruz, E. Noronha, G.Notelaers, & C. Rayner (Eds.), Concepts, Approaches and Methods. Handbooks of Workplace Bullying, Emotional Abuse and Harassment. Singapore: Springer.
  • Leon-Perez, J. M., Notelaers, G., Arenas, A., Munduate, L., & Medina, F. J. (2014). Identifying victims of workplace bullying by integrating traditional estimation approaches into a latent class cluster model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(7), 1155-1177. doi:10.1177/0886260513506280
  • Magee, C., Gordon, R., Robinson, L., Caputi, P., & Oades, L. (2017). Workplace bullying and absenteeism: The mediating roles of poor health and work engagement. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(3), 319-334. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12156
  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. doi:10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
  • Metz, C. E. (1978). Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 8(4), 283-298. doi:10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2
  • Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). International Test Commission guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. doi:10.7334/psicothema2013.24
  • Nielsen, M. B., Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying. A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 955-979. doi:10.1348/096317909X481256
  • Nielsen, M. B., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H.Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 149-174). London: CRC Press.
  • Nielsen, M.B., Skogstad, A., Matthiesen, S. B., Glasø, L., Aasland, M. S., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: Comparisons across time and estimation methods. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 81-101. doi:10.1080/13594320801969707
  • Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2013). The world turns at 33 and 45: Defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire– Revised in a representative sample. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(6), 670-682. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.690558
  • Notelaers, G., Einarsen, S., De Witte, H., & Vermunt, J. K. (2006). Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach. Work & Stress, 20(4), 289-302. doi:10.1080/02678370601071594
  • Notelaers, G., Van der Heijden, B., Hoel, H., & Einarsen, S. (2018). Measuring bullying at work with the short-negative acts questionnaire: Identification of targets and criterion validity, Work & Stress, 33(1), 58-75. doi:10.1080/02678373.2018.1457736.
  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396-402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
  • Park, H., Bjørkelo, B., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2018). External Whistleblowers’ Experiences of Workplace Bullying by Superiors and Colleagues. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3936-9.
  • Petrović, I.B., Vukelić, M., & Čizmić, S. (2017). Rocking at 81 and rolling at 34: ROC cut-off scores for the negative acts questionnaire– revised in Serbia. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2058-2070. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02058
  • Rocha, K. B., Pérez, K., Sanz, M. R., Borrell, C., & Llandrich, J. O. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población general española [Psychometric properties and normative values of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Spanish population]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11(1), 125-139.
  • Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Antino, M., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2017). Crossdomain consequences of workplace bullying: A multi-source daily diary study. Work & Stress, 31(3), 297-314. doi:10.1080/02678373.2017.1330782
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Samnani, A. K. (2013). The early stages of workplace bullying and how it becomes prolonged: The role of culture in predicting target responses. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 119-132. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1286-6
  • Schreiber, J. B. Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King J. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323-338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
  • Trépanier, S. G., Fernet, C., & Austin, S. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of workplace bullying, basic need satisfaction, and employee functioning. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(1), 105-116. doi:10.1037/a0037726
  • Youden, W. J. (1950). Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3(1), 32-35.
  • Zapf, D., Escartín, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2011). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In S. Einarsen, H.Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 75-106). London: CRC Press.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet