El modelo británico de nombramientos judiciales«Judicial independence in law»

Bibliographische Referenzen

• «Our New Constitution», Law Quarterly Review 120, 2004, pp. 241 y ss.
• Ahmed K., «Cabinet ignored over Historical Legal reforms», The Observer, 15 June 2003.
• Andrew le Seur: «The Conception of the UK’s Supreme Court», in Building the UK’s Supreme Court, Oxford University Press, UK 2004; pp. 3-20;
• Andrews N., «Judicial independence: The British Experience» in S. Shetreet and Forsyth C. (eds.), The Culture of Independence: conceptual foundations and practical Challenges, Leiden: Martinues Nijhoff, 2012;
• Bell J., «Judicial Cultures and Judicial Independence», European Legal Studies, n. 47 (60) 2001, Cambridge Y. B.
• Blom-Cooper L., Dickson B. y Drewry G., (eds) The Judicial House of Lords 1876-2009, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
• Bogdanor V., Beyond Brexit: Towards a British Constitution, I.B. Tauris, United Kingdom 2019; pp. 31 y ss.
• Bradley A., Constitutional Reform Act 2005, 5th Report of Session 2005-06, Select Committee on the Constitution, House of Lords;»
• Clarke, L., «Selecting Judges: Merit, Moral courage, Judgment and Diversity», High Court Quarterly Review 49, 2009, (5);
• Darbyshire P., Sitting in Judgment: the working lives of Judges, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2011, pp.
• Delaney E., «Searching for constitutional meaning in institutional design: The debate over Judicial appointments in the United Kingdom», in I-CON, vol. 14, n.º 3, 2016, pp. 752 y ss.
• Department of Constitutional Affairs, Constitutional Reform: a new way of Appointing Judges (CP 10/3 2003).
• G. Gee y E. Rackley, op. cít., Capítulo 1: «Introduction. Diversity and the JAC’s first ten years», pp. 21 y ss.
• G. Gee, Judging the JAC. How much judicial influence over judicial appointments is too much?, Debating Judicial Appointment Commission, Routledge 2018, capítulo 8;
• Goldstream G., «Judicial Appointment in England», n.º 43, Journal of the American Judicial Society´, 1959, pp. 40 y ss.
• Goodall K., «Ideas of «Representation» in UK Court Structures» Le Seur A., Building the UK’S new Supreme Court. National and Comparative perspectives, Oxford University Press 2007, pp. 69;
• Graham G., «Judging the JAC. How much influence over judicial appointment is too much?» in Graham Gee and Erika Rackley, Debating Judicial Appointment in Age of Diversity, Routledge 2017.
• Graham G., Hazell R., Malleson K., O’brien P., The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK’s Changing Constitution, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom 2015.
• GRIFFITH J.A.G., «The Political Constitution», MLR Modern Law Review, n.º 42, January 1979, pp. 1-21;
• K. Malleson y R. Moules, The Legal System, Oxford 2011, pp.216.
• Kelsen, H., The General Theory of Law and the State, Russell & Russell 1961, pp. 153 y 154;
• Le Seur A., and Cornes R., The Future of the United Kingdom’s Highest Courts, University College, London 2001; Malleson K., The Legal system, Oxford university press, London 2011;
• Le Seur A., Building the UK’S new Supreme Court. National and Comparative perspectives, Oxford University press, 2007, pp. 6 y ss.
• Le Suer A., «Imagining judges in a written UK Constitution»; U.K. Constitutional Blog, 14 May 2014;
• Lord Hope, «A Phoenix from the Ashes? Accommodating a New Supreme Court», Law Quarterly Review, vol. 121, 2005, pp. 250 y ss.
• Lord Irvine Of Lairg, Sovereignty in Comparative perspective: constitutionalism in Britain and America, in Human Rights, Constitutional Law and the Development of the English Legal system: Selected essays 227, 2003, pp. 229 y ss.
• Lord Mackay, «The Lord Chancellor’s Role within Government», New Law Journal n.º 145, 1995, pp. 1651 y ss.
• M. Kate, G. Gee, R. Hazell, P. O’brien, The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK’s Changing Constitution, Cambridge University Press, London 2015, pp. 162 y ss.
• Masterman R., Murkens J., «Skirting supremacy and subordination: the constitutional authority of the UK Supreme Court», Public Law, vol. 4, October 2013, pp. 800 y ss;
• Mcharg Aileen, «Reforming the United Kingdom Constitution: Law, Convention, Soft Law.», 71 Mod. L. Rev. 853 (2008)
• Morison J., «Beyond merit. The new challenge for judicial appointments», Debating Judicial Appointments in an age of Diversity, op. cít., chapter 11.
• P. O’BRIEN, «Enemies of the People»: Judges, the Media, and the Mythic Lord», Public Law, number extra about Brexit 2017, pp. 136 y 137;
• Paterson A. y Paterson C., «Guarding the Guardians? Towards an Independent, Accountable and Diverse Senior Judiciary», London: Centre-Forum, 2012, pp. 36 y ss.
• Paterson Obe A., «Power and judicial appointment: squaring the impossible circle» Gee G., y Rackley E., Debating Judicial Appointments in an age of Diversity, Routledge 2018, chapter 3;
• Pitkin H. F., El concepto de representación, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, Madrid 1985.
• RESOLUTION 1342 (2003), Texto adoptado por el Comité permanente de la Asamblea parlamentaria del Consejo de Europa el 8 de septiembre de 2003 siendo su Rapporteur: Mr. Erik Jurgens.
• Rosenberg, J., «Senior judges are hanging up their wigs. Replacing them won’t be cheap» The Guardian, 4 Abril 2016;
• Shetreet S. y Turenne S., Judges on trial. The independence and accountability of the English Judiciary, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom 2013, pp. 102-103;
• Skold M. «The Reform Act’s Supreme Court: a missed opportunity for Judicial Review in the United Kingdom», CONN. L. REV., 2007, pp. 2149 y ss.
• The Appointment, Tenure and Removal of Judges under Commonwealth principles. A compendium an Analysis of Best Practice, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2015, pp. 15 y ss.
• Virgala Foruria E., La Constitución británica en el Siglo xxi. Soberanía parlamentaria, constitucionalismo Common law y leyes constitucionales, Marcial Pons 2018, pp. 26 y 27.
• Woodhouse D., «United Kingdom, The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 —defending Judicial Independence the English way», I-CON, Vol. 5, n.º 1, 2007, pp. 153 y 154.
• Woodhouse D., The Office of Lord Chancellor, Hart Publishing Oxford, London 2001
• Woolf H., «Judicial Review, The tensions between the executive and the Judiciary», Law Quarterly Review, 114, 1998, pp. 579.
• Woolf L., «Judicial Independence not Judicial isolation», The Pursuit of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008, págs. 165 y ss.