El aprendizaje como contexto determinante de la psicología científicala Psicología Comparada y la Psicología Funcional

  1. Juan Bautista Fuentes Ortega
Revue:
Revista de historia de la psicología

ISSN: 0211-0040

Année de publication: 2019

Volumen: 40

Número: 3

Pages: 32-44

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de historia de la psicología

Résumé

In the course of the tradition of reflex physiology and the tradition of comparative animal psychology, a new type of experimental and operative psychology emerges, consisting of the incorporation of temporary associations in the form of “at a distance” links, which establishes a rupture with the corresponding biological methodologies and that entails the construction of the field of learning as the context of scientific psychology. In the light of this historical-epistemological analysis, the limited virtuality that the so-called “biological limits of learning” and the so-called cognitive scientific revolution had for the practice of scientific psychology is analyzed. Finally, it is pointed out the need to distinguish carefully between the scientific practice and the philosophical self-representation that scientists often build around their effective practice.

Références bibliographiques

  • Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36(7), 715-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.7.715
  • Bolles, R. C. (1970). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review, 77(1), 32-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028589
  • Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961). The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 16(11), 681-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040090
  • Darwin, Ch. (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Londres, Reino Unido: John Murray.
  • Fuentes, J.B. (2019). El aprendizaje como contexto determinante de la Psicología científica: metodología biológica versus metodología psicológica [Learning as the Determining Context of Scientific Psychology: Biological versus Psychological Methodologies]. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 40(2), 27– 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/rhp2019a7
  • Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidancelearning. Psychonomic Science, 4(3), 123-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03342209
  • Krechevsky, I. (1933). Hereditary nature of “hypotheses.” Journal of Comparative Psychology, 16(1), 99-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0072223
  • Marchesi, A. (1983). Conceptos espaciales, mapas cognitivos y orientación en el espacio [Spatial Concepts, Cognitive Maps and Spatial Orientation]. Estudios de Psicología, 14-15, 85-92.
  • Masterman, M. (1970). The Nature of a Paradigm. In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Londres, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
  • Morgan, C. Ll. (1894). An Introduction to Comparative Psychology. Londres, Reino Unido: W. Scott, Limited.
  • Morgan, C. Ll. (1896). Habit and Instinct. Londres & Nueva York: Edward Arnold.
  • Seligman, M. E. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77(5), 406-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0029790
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal Intelligence. An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals. Psychological Review, 2(4), 1-109. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092987
  • Weismann, A. (1882). Studies in the Theory of Descent. Londres, Reino Unido: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington.
  • Wilcoxon, H. C., Dragoin, W. B., & Kral, P. A. (1971). Illness-induced aversions in rat and quail: Relative salience of visual and gustatory cues. Science, 171(3973), 826-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3973.826
La source de données: Dialnet