Management, productivity and firm heterogeneity in international trade

  1. Javier Serrano Martinez 2
  2. Rafael Myro Sánchez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Analistas Financieros Internacionales, Madrid, Spain
Revista:
Applied economic analysis

ISSN: 2632-7627

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 28

Número: 82

Páginas: 1-18

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Applied economic analysis

Resumen

Purpose – This paper aims to analyse the relevance of management and productivity in the behaviour of firms in international trade. Design/methodology/approach – Using a survey of Spanish manufacturing firms, the authors use a management quality index to serve as a proxy for the good management practice of the firm. Findings – The results demonstrate that exporter and multinationals firms are more productive and better managed than domestic firms. Furthermore, in the periods in which switcher firms decide to export or to invest abroad, they are better managed but are not more productive than in the rest of the periods. Finally, results indicate that regardless of its positive relationship with productivity, management also has a direct impact on the firm’s probability of exporting and involving in foreign direct investment. Originality/value – This paper aims to reconcile the recent international trade literature, which focusses on the role of productivity heterogeneity in international trade, with the international business literature, concentrated on depicting the key management practices that impact internationalization.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andrews, D. and Westmore, B. (2014), “Managerial capital and business R&D as enablers of productivity convergence”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1137, OECD Publishing.
  • Bernard, A.B., Jensen, J.B. and Lawrence, R.Z. (1995), “Exporters, jobs and wages in US Manufacturing: 1976-1987”, Brooking Papers of Economic Activity. Microeconomics, Vol. 1995, pp. 67-119.
  • Bernard, A.B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J.B. and Kortum, S. (2003), “Plants and productivity in international trade”,American Economic Review, Vol. 93 No. 4, pp. 1268-1290.
  • Beugelsdijk, S., Brakman, S., Garretsen, H. and van Marrewijk, C. (2013), International Economics and Business. Nations and Firms in the Global Economy, Cambridge University Press.
  • Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2007), “Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and nations”,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 122 No. 4, pp. 1351-1408.
  • Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2010a), “Why do management practices differ across firms and countries?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 203-224.
  • Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2010b), “New approaches to surveying organizations”, American Economic Review, Vol. 100 No. 2, pp. 105-109.
  • Bloom, N., Sadun, R. and Van Reenen, J. (2009), “The organization of firms across countries”, NBER Working Paper Series, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
  • Campo, S. and Yagüe, M.J. (2018), “El Capital Directivo”, in Myro, R. (dir.),Una nueva política industrial para España. Consejo Economico y Social, cap. 7.
  • Dunning, J.H. (1980a), “Toward an ecletic theory of international production: some empirical tests”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 9-31.
  • Dunning, J.H. (1980b), “The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future”, International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 173-190.
  • Dunning, J.H. (2011), “The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future”, International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 2 No. 8, pp. 173-190.
  • Ellis, P.D. (2011), “Social ties and international entrepreneurship: opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 99-127.
  • Ganotakis, P. and Love, J.H. (2012), “Export propensity, export intensity and performance: the role of the entrepreneurial founding team”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 43 No. 8, pp. 693-718.
  • Haahti, A., Madupu, V., Yavas, U. and Babakus, E. (2005), “Cooperative strategy, knowledge intensity and export performance of small and medium sized enterprises”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 124-138.
  • Halvorsen, R. and Palmquist, R. (1980), “The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations”,American Economic Review, Vol. 70 No. 3, pp. 474-475.
  • He, X., Brouthers, K.D. and Filatotchev, I. (2013), “Resource-Based and institutional perspectives on export channel selection and export performance”, Journal of Management, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 27-47.
  • Heckscher, E. (1919), “The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income”, Ekonomisk Tidskrift, Vol. 21, pp. 1-32.
  • Helpman, E. (1984), “A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 92 No. 3, pp. 451-471.
  • Helpman, E. (2011), Understanding Global Trade, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Helpman, E. and Krugman, P. (1985),Market Structure and Foreign Trade, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M.J. and Yeaple, S.R. (2004), “Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms”, American Economic Review, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 300-316.
  • Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.E. (1977), “The internationalization process of the firm. A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 8 No. 1.
  • Johanson, J. and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975), “The internationalization of the firm. Four Swedish cases”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 305-323.
  • Krugman, P. (1980), “Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 70 No. 5, pp. 950-959.
  • Lamb, P., Sandberg, J. and Liesch, P.W. (2011), “Small firm internationalisation unveiled through phenomenography”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 672-693.
  • Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F. and Prencipe, A. (2012), “Trapped or spurred by the home region? The effects of potential social capital on involvement in foreign markets for goods and technology”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 43 No. 9, pp. 783-807.
  • Melitz, M.J. (2003), “The impact of trade in intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity”, Econometrica, Vol. 71 No. 6, pp. 1695-1725.
  • Ohlin, B. (1933), Interregional and International Trade, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Olley, G.S. and Pakes, A. (1996), “The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry”, Econometrica, Vol. 64 No. 6, pp. 1263-1297.
  • Ricardo, D. (1817),On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, JohnMurray, London. Shamsuddoha, A.K., Yunus, M. and
  • Oly Ndubisi, N. (2009), “Impact of government export assistance on internationalization of SMEs from developing nations”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 408-422.
  • Yeaple, S.R. (2009), “Firm heterogeneity and the structure of US multinational activity”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 78 No. 2, pp. 206-2015.
  • Bender, S., Bloom, N., Card, D., Van Reenen, J. and Wolter, S. (2016), “Management practices, workforce selection and productivity”, NBERWorking Paper Series, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
  • Bloom, N., Garicano, L., Sadun, R. and Van Reenen, J. (2010), “The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization”, Harvard Business School Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet