Studying Men's ViolencesSome Key Methodological Principles in Developing a European Research Framework.

Referencias bibliográficas

• Andersson, S. (2003). Ordnande praktiker. En studie av status, homosocialitet och manligheter utifran tva ndrpolisorganisationer. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet, Pedagogiska institutionen.
• Bagarozzi, D., & Giddings. C.W. (1983). Conjugal violence: A critical review of current research and clinical practices. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 11, 3-15. doi:10.1080/01926 188308250106
• Bergman, B. & Brismar, B. (1992). Family violence is a learned behaviour. Journal of Public Health, 106, pp. 45-52.
• Bhatti-Sinclair, K. (1994). Asian women and violence from male Partners. In C. Lupton and T. Gillespie (Eds.), Working with Violence. (pp. 75-95). London: Macmillan.
• Carrigan, T., Connell, R.W., & Lee, J. (1985). Towards a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551-604. doi: 10.1007/BF00160017
• Connell, R.W. (1993). The big picture: Masculinities in recent world history. Theory and Society, 22(5), 597-623. doi: 10.1007/BF00993538
• Connell, R.W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
• Connell, R.W. (1998). Men in the world: Masculinities andglobalization. Men and Masculinities, 1(1), 3-23. doi: 10.1177/1097184X98001001001
• Connell, R. (2004). Masculinities, change and conflict in global society: Project outline - July 2004. Sydney: University of Sydney.
• Connell, R. (2005). Measuring gender patterns: Rationale for interviews. Sydney: University of Sydney.
• Connell, R.W., Hearn, J., & Kimmel, M. (2005). Introduction. In M. Kimmel, J. Hearn, and R.W. Connell (eds.) Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. (pp. 1-12). Thousand Oaks. Ca.: Sage.
• Connell, R.W., & Messeschimidt, J.W. (2005). Hegomonic masculinity. Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829-859. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639
• Cornwall, A., Edstrém, J., & Greig, A. (eds.) (2011). Men and Development: Politicizing Masculinitie. London: Zed.
• DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2002). Theorizing Public Housing Woman abuse as a Function of Economic Exclusion and Male Peer Support. Women’s Health and Urban Life, 1(2), 26-45. Retrieved from: https://tspace. library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/17396
• DeKeseredy, W.S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2005). Masculinities and Interpersonal Violence. In M. Kimmel, J. Hearn and R. W. Connell (Eds). Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. (pp. 353-366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society, 22 (5), 643-657. doi: 10.1007/BF00993540
• Edleson, J.L., Eisikovits, Z., & Guttman, E. (1985). Men who batter women: a critical review of the evidence. Journal of Family Issues, 6 (2), 229-247. doi: 10.1177/019251385006002006
• European Commision (2010). Feasibility Study to Assess the Possibilities, Opportunities and Needs to Standardise National Legislation on Violence Agaianst Women, Violence Against Children and Sexual Orientation Violence. Luxembourg: European Commission.
• Gelles, P.J. (1983). An exchange/social control theory. In D. Finkelhor, R.J. Gelles, G.T. Hotaling and M.A. Straus (Eds.) The Dark Side of Families. (pp.151-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Gilmore, D. (1990). Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
• Gondolf, E.W. (1985). Men Who Batter: An Intergrated Approach for Stopping Wife Abuse. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications.
• Hanmer, J. (1990). Men, power and the exploitation of women. In J. Hearn and D. Morgan (Eds.), Men, Masculinities and Social Theory. (pp. 21-42). London and New York: Unwin Hyman/Routledge.
• Hanmer, J. and Hearn, J. (1999). Gender and welfare research. In F. Williams, J. Popay and A. Oakley (eds.) Welfare Research: A Critical Review. (pp.106-130), UCL Press, London.
• Hanmer, J., Radford, J., & Stanko, E.A. (Eds.) (1989), Women, Policing and Male Violence: International Perspectives. London: Routledge.
• Hearn, J. (1987). The Gender of Oppression: Men, Masculinity and the Critique of Marxism. Brighton: Wheatsheaf; New York: St. Martin’s.
• Hearn, J. (1992). Men in the Public Eye: the Construction and Deconstruction of Public Men and Public Patriarchies. London and New York: Routledge.
• Hearn, J. (1996). Is masculinity dead? A critique of the concept of masculinity/masculinities. In M. Mac an Ghaill (Ed.), Understanding Masculinities. (pp. 202-217). Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Hearn, J. (1998a). Theorizing men and men’s theorizing: men’s discursive practices in theorizing men. Theory and Society, 27(6), 781-816. doi: 10.2307/658031
• Hearn, J. (1998b). The Violences of Men. How Men Talk About and How Agencies Respond to Men's Violence to Women. London: Sage.
• Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5 (1), 97-120. doi: 10.1177/1464700104040813   Hearn, J. (2013). The sociological significance of domestic violence: tensions, paradoxes, and implications. Current Sociology, 16 (2), 1-19. doi: 10.1177/0011392112456503
• Hearn, J., Miiller, U., Oleksy, E., Pringle, K., Chernova, J., Ferguson, H., Holter, @.G., Kolga, V., Novikova, I., Ventimiglia, C., Lattu, E., Tallberg, T., & Olsvik, E. (2004). The European Research Network on Men in Europe: The Social Problem and Societal Problematisation of Men and Masculinities. Volumes 1 and 2. Brussels: European Commission.
• Hearn, J., Novikova, I., Pringle, K., Smidova, L, Bjerén, G., Jyrkinen, M., Iovanni, L., Arranz, F., Ferguson, H., Kolga, V., Miiller, U., Oleksy, E.H., Balkmar, D., Helfferich, C., Lenz, I., Wojtaszek, M.., Pitukane, E., & Rosa, V. (2007). Methodological Framework Report SN 2. FP6 Co-ordination Action on Human Rights Violation, Sub Network 2, Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, Final Report to the European Commission, Retrieved from http://www.cahrv.uni- osnabrueck.de/reddot/Methodological_Framework_web.pdf, http://www.cromenet.org/
• Hearn, J., & Pringle, K., with members of CROME (2006). European Perspectives on Men and Masculinities: National and Transnational Approaches. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hearn, J., & Whitehead. A. (2006). Collateral damage: Men’s ‘domestic’ violence to women seen through men’s relations with men. Probation Journal, 53 (1), 38-56. doi: 10.1177/0264550506060864
• Holter, @.G. (1997). Gender, Patriarchy and Capitalism. A Social Forms Analysis. Oslo: University of Oslo.
• Horsfall, J. (1999). The Presence of the Past: Male Violence in the Family. North Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
• Kaufman Kantor, G., & Straus, M.A. (1987). The ‘drunken bum’ theory of wife beating. Social Problems, 34 (3), 213-230. doi: 10.1525/sp.1987.34.3.03a00010
• Kelly, L. (2006). Benefits and Limitations of Human Rights Frameworks: The Case of Interpersonal Violence. Analytic report on the CAHRY cross-cutting workshop. Valencia, June 2006. The report was prepared within CAHRV and funded through the European Commission, 6th Framework Programme, Project No. 506348.
• Kimmel, M., Hearn, J., & Connell, R.W. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.
• Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving Abusive Partners. London: Sage.
• Kroon, S., & Sturm, J. (2000). Comparative case study research in education: Methodological issues in an empirical-interpretative perspective. Zeitschrift fiir Erziehungswissenschaft, 3(4/2000), 559-576.
• Lees, J., & Lloyd, T. (1994). Working with Men Who Batter Their Partners (An Introductory Text). London: Working with Men/The B Team.
• Lundgren, E., Heimer, G., Westerstrand, J., & Kalliokoski A.M. (2001). Captured Queen: Men's violence against women in “equal” Sweden — a prevalence study. Stockholm: Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer.
• Mangan, J., & Walvin, J. (Eds.) (1987). Manliness and Morality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Martinez, M., Schréttle, M., Condon, S., Springer-Kremser, M.,Timmerman, G., Hagemann-White, C., Lenz, H-J, May-Chahal, C., Penhale, B., Reingardiene, J., Brzank, P., Honkatukia, P.,Jaspard, M., Lundgren, E., Piispa, M., Romito, P., Walby, S., & Westerstrand, J. (2006). State of European research on the prevalence of Interpersonal violence and its impact on health and human rights. Coordination Action on Human Rights Violations, European Commission 6th Framework Programme. Retrieved from http://www.cahrv.uni- osnabrueck.de/reddot/CAHRVreportPrevalence(1).pdf
• McMehon, A. (1993). Male readings of feminist theory: The psychologization of sexual politics in the masculinity literature. Theory and Society, 22 (5), 675-696. doi: 10.1007/BF00993542
• Messerschmidt, J.W. (1993). Masculinities and Crime: Ctitique and Reconceptualisation of Theory. Latham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.  
• Michalski, J. H. (2004). Making Sociological Sense out of Trends in Intimate Partner Violence. Violence Against Women: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 10 (6), 652-675. doi: 10.1177/1077801204265018
• Miedzian M. (1992). Boys will be Boys: Breaking the link between masculinity and violence. Virago, London.
• Nordberg, M. (2000). Hegemonibegreppet och hegemonier i mansforskningsfaltet. In Folkesson, P., Nordberg M., Smirthwaite, G. (eds.), Hegemoni och mansforskning. Karlstad: Karlstad University.
• Novikova, I., & Kambourov, D. (Eds.) (2003). Men and Masculinities in the Global World: Integrating Postsocialist Perspectives. Kikimora Publishers, Aleksanteri Institute, Helsinki.
• Pease, R., & Pringle, K. (Eds.) (2001). A Man's World: Changing Men’ Practices in a Globalized World. London: Zed.
• Pringle, K. (1995). Men, Masculinities and Social Welfare. London: UCL Press.
• Pringle, K. (2005). Neglected issues in Swedish child protection policy and practice. In M. Eriksson, M. Hester, S. Keskinen and K. Pringle (eds.), Tackling Mens Violence in Families (pp. 155-171). Bristol: Policy Press.
• Pringle, K., Hearn, J. Ferguson, H., Kambourov, D., Kolga, V., Lattu, E., Miller, U., Nordberg, M., Novikova, I., Oleksy, E., Rydzewska, J., Smidova, L, Tallberg, T., & Niemi,H. (2006). Men and Masculinities in Europe. London: Whiting & Birch.
• Rice, M. (1990). Challenging orthodoxies in feminist theory: A black feminist critique. In L. Gelsthorpe and A. Morris (eds.), Feminist Perspectives in Criminology. (pp. 57-69). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
• Ruspini, E., Hearn, J., Pease, B., & Pringle, K. (Eds.) (2011). Men and Masculinities around the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Stanko, E. (1994). Challenging the problem of men's individual violence. In T. Newburn and E. Stanko (Eds.). Just Boys Doing Business: Men, Masculinities and Crime. (pp. 32.45). London: Routledge.
• Tifft, L. (1993). Battering of Women: The Failure of Intervention and the Case for Prevention. Boulder, CO: Westview.  
• Tjeder, D. (2003). The Power of Character: Middle-class Masculinities, 1800-1900. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
• Walby, S. (1986). Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchal and Capitalist Relations in Employment. Cambridge: Polity.
• Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Walby, S. (2009). Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. London: Sage.
• West C., & Zimmermann, D.H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), pp. 125-151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002
• Whitehead, A. (2005). Man to man violence: How masculinity may work as a dynamic risk factor. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(4), pp. 411-422. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00385.x
• World Health Organization (2010). European Status Report on Alcohol and Heaith 2010. Copenhagen: WHO. Retrieved from hhtp://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/128065/e94533.pdf