Relación y correspondencia entre diversos indicadores de repercusión en una muestra de artículos de excelencia

  1. Granda Orive, José Ignacio 4
  2. Alonso Arroyo, Adolfo 5
  3. Pascual Lledó, José Francisco 6
  4. López Padilla, Daniel E. 1
  5. García Río, Francisco 2
  6. Aleixandre Benavent, Rafael 3
  1. 1 Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid
  2. 2 Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid
  3. 3 Unidad de Información e Investigación Social y Sanitaria-UISYS, CSIC-Universidad de Valencia
  4. 4 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
    info

    Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00qyh5r35

  5. 5 Departamento de Historia de la Ciencia y Documentación, Facultad de Medicina y Odontología, Universidad de Valencia
  6. 6 Servicio de Neumología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Anales de documentación: revista de biblioteconomía y documentación

ISSN: 1697-7904,  1575-2437

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 19

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESDOC.19.1.247101 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de documentación: revista de biblioteconomía y documentación

Resumen

The objective was to compare the impact factor to 2 years of self-citations (IF2Y) with impact factor 2 years without self-citations (IF2YWS) and IF2Y with the impact factor to 5 years (IF5Y) as well as IF2YWS with SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) about journals where they were published articles of excellence in smoking by Spanish authors in the period 2008-2012. The search was conducted in the SCI-E and the SSCI-E on November 25, 2013. Were selected documents that had the h index of the strategy global sample (number of articles that have at least that number of citations) to search using the descriptors "smok *" OR "tobac *". A total of 69 articles by Spanish authors were recovered from 55 journals. We found an almost perfect correlation between IF2Y and IF2YWS, reaching IF2Y the highest values. We also found an almost perfect correlation between IF2Y and IF5Y with good agreement, reaching FI5a highest values with a great variability and heterogeneity between journals. The correlation between IF2YWS and SJR is poor with a low concordance. Systematically, the IF2YWS have always higher values than SJR and both indicators measure, therefore, different aspects, not be extrapolated or interchangeable.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AKSNES, D.W. A macro study of self-citations. Scientometrics, 2003, vol. 56, p. 235-246.
  • BOLLEN, J.; VAN DE SOMPEL, H.; HAGBERG, A. y CHUTE, R. A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 2009, vol. 4, nº 6. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
  • BLAND, J.M. y ALTMAN, D.G. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 1986, vol. I, p. 307-310.
  • CHANG, C.L.; MC ALEER, M. y OXLEY, L. Coercive Journal self citations, impact factor, Journal influence and article influence. Disponible en: <http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/39190/2013-040.pdf> [Consulta: 24 de diciembre de 2015].
  • COSTAS, R.; VAN LEEUWEN, T.N. y BORDONS, M. Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: effects of different calculation methods. Scientometrics, 2010, vol. 82, p. 517-537.
  • DAVIS, P.M. Eigenfactor: does the principle of repeated improvement result in better journal impact estimates than raw citation counts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, vol. 59, p. 2186-2188.
  • FALAGAS, M.E.; KOURANOS, V.D.; ARENCIBIA, J.A. y KARAGEORGOPOULUS, D.E. Comparison of SCImago Journal Rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB Journal, 2008, vol. 22, p. 2623-2628.
  • FOWLER, J.H. y AKSNES, D.W. Does self – citation pay? Scientometrics, 2007, vol. 72, p. 427-437.
  • GARCÍA PACHÓN, E. y ARENCIBIA, J.R. Comparación del factor de impacto y el índice SCImago Journal Rank en las revistas del sistema respiratorio. Archivos de Bronconeumología, 2014, vol. 50, p. 308-309.
  • GARFIELD, E. Citation Analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. 1962. Disponible en: <http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p527y1962-73.pdf> [Consulta: 24 de diciembre de 2015].
  • GARFIELD, E. y SHER, I.H. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 1963, vol. 18, p. 195-201.
  • GLÄNZEL, W.; DEBACKERE, K.; THIJS, B. y SHUBERT, A. A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy. 2005. Disponible en: <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.468.4196&rep=rep1&type=pdf> [Consulta: 24 de diciembre de 2015].
  • GLÄNZEL, W. y THIJS, B. The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric macro-indicators. Scientometrics, 2004a, vol. 59, p. 281-310.
  • GLÄNZEL, W. y THIJS, B. Does coauthorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics, 2004b, vol. 61, p. 395-404.
  • GLÄNZEL, W.; THIJS, B. y SCHLEMMER, B. A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics, 2004, vol. 59, p. 63-77.
  • GRANDA-ORIVE, J.I. et al. Ciertas ventajas de Scopus sobre Web of Science en un análisis bibliométrico sobre tabaquismo. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 2013a, vol. 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.2.941.
  • GRANDA-ORIVE, J.I. et al. Literatura científica en el ámbito del tabaquismo y el sistema respiratorio: repercusión y colaboración. Archivos de Bronconeumología, 2013b, vol. 49, p. 282-288.
  • GRANDA-ORIVE, J.I. et al. Redes de colaboración científica internacional en tabaquismo. Análisis de co-autorías a través del Science Citation Index durante el periodo 1999-2003. Gaceta Sanitaria, 2009a, vol. 23, nº 222.
  • GRANDA-ORIVE, J.I. et al. World-wide collaboration among medical specialties in smoking research: production, collaboration, visibility and influence. Research Evaluation, 2009b, vol. 18, p. 3-12.
  • GUERREO BOTE, V.P. y MOYA ANEGÓN, F. A further step forward in measuring journal’s scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, vol. 6, p. 674-678.
  • JACSÓ, P. Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports. Online Information Review, 2009, vol. 33, nº 3, p. 603-614. Disponible en: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220207254_Journal_Citation_ReportsFiveyear_impact_factor_data_in_the_Journal_Citation_Reports> [Consulta: 24 de diciembre de 2015].
  • KIANIFAR, H.; SADEGHI, R. y ZARIFMAHMOUDI, L. Comparison between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCImago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals. Acta Informática Médica, 2014, vol. 22, p. 103-106.
  • KIM, J.A.; HUH, S. y CHU, M.S. Correlation among the citation indices of Korean scientific journals listed in international databases. Science Edition, 2014, vol. 1, p. 27-36.
  • LIN, L.I.K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 1989, vol. 45, p. 255-268.
  • MC ROBERTS, M.H. y MC ROBERTS, B.R. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. JASIS, 1989, vol. 40, p. 342-349.
  • RAMIN, S. y SHIRAZI, A.S. Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago Journal Rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nuclear Medicine Review, 2012, vol. 15, p. 132-136.
  • ROUSSEAU, R. y The Stimulated 8 Group. On the relation between the WoS impact factor, the Eigenfactor, the SCImago Journal rank, the article influence score and the journal h index. 2009. Disponible en: <http://eprints.rclis.org/13304/> [Consulta: 24 de diciembre de 2015].
  • SANZ VALERO, J.; TOMÁS CASTERÁ, V. y WANDEN-BERGHE, C. Estudio bibliométrico de la producción científica publicada por la Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/ Pan American Journal of Public Health en el período de 1997 a 2012. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 2014, vol. 35, p. 81-88.
  • SIEBELT, M. et al. Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2010, vol. 11, p. 4. Disponible en: <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/4> [Consulta: 24 de diciembre de 2015].
  • THIJS, B. y GLÄNZEL, W. The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric meso-indicator. The case of the European universities. Scientometrics, 2006, vol. 66, p. 71-80.
  • TORRES-SALINAS, D. y JIMÉNEZ CONTRERAS, E. Introducción y estudio comparativo de los nuevos indicadores de citación sobre revistas científicas en Journal Citation Reports y Scopus. El Profesional de la Información, 2010, vol. 19, p. 201-207.
  • VAN RAAN, A.F.J. The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 1998, vol. 42, p. 423-428.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet