La compra pública como instrumento de transferencia de conocimiento en regiones periféricasevidencias de un estudio de caso en España

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahedo, M. (2012). Repensando los estudios de sistemas de innovación. El sistema catalán de innovación como lugar estratégico de investigación. Arbor, 188(753): 49-62.
• Antonelli, C. (2003). Knowledge complementarity and fungeability: implications for regional strategy. Reg. Studies, 37, 595-606
• Baldwin, J., Gellatly, G. (2003). Innovation Strategies and Performance in Small Firms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Barge-Gil, A., Modrego, A. (2011). The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 61-83.
• Barge-Gil, A., Santamaría, L., Modrego, A. (2011). Complementarities between universities and technology institutes: New empirical lessons and perspectives. European Planning Studies, 19(2), 195-215.
• Becker, W., Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209-223.
• Bekkers, R., Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 18371853.
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407-429.
• Bordons, M., Morillo, F., Gómez Caridad, I., Moreno, L., Lorenzo, P., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B. (2017). La actividad científica del CSIC a través de indicadores bibliométricos (Web of Sience, 2012-2016) (en línea). http://digital.csic. es/handle/10261/159147, acceso: 3 de mayo de 2018.
• Borrás, S., Edler, J. (2014). The governance of change in socio-technical and innovation systems: three pillars for a conceptual framework. En S. Borrás, J. Edler (eds.), The Governance of Socio-Technical Systems: Explaining Change (pp. 23-48). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Bos, L., Corvers, S. 2006. Pre-commercial Public Procurement. A missing link in the European Innovation Cycle Public Needs as a driver for innovation. Extracts of expert group report published by DG INFSO (Directorate General for Information Society and Media, European Commission).
• Branscomb, L. M., Auerswald, P. E. (2001). Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Executives and Investors Manage High-Tech Risks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the Factors That Diminish the Barriers to University-Industry Collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868.
• Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., Panaghiotopoulos, P. (2015). Public procurement for e-government services: challenges and problems related to the implementation of a new innovative scheme in Greek local authorities. En C. Edquist, N. S. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. Edler (eds.), Public procurement for innovation (pp. 209-234). Cheltentham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Caracostas, P., Muldur, U. (1998). Society, the Endless Frontier - A European Vision of Research and Innovation Policies for the 21 st Century. Luxembourg: European Commission, EUR 17655.
• Cooke, P., Gómez Uranga, M. (1998). Dimensiones de un sistema de innovación regional: organizaciones e instituciones, Ekonomiaz, 41, 46-67.
• Cooke, P., Piccaluga, A. (eds.) (2004). Regional Economies as Knowledge Laboratories. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Cruz-Castro, L., Holl, A., Rama, R., Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2017). Economic crisis and company R&D in Spain: do regional and policy factors matter? Industry and Innovation, 25(8), 729-751.
• Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications London.
• Czarnitzki, D., Hünermund, P., Moshgbar, N. (2018). Public procurement as policy instrument for innovation (en línea). https://ub-madoc.bib. uni-mannheim.de/44178/1/dp18001.pdf, acceso: 15 de mayo de 2018.
• Dawson, A., Hjorth, D. (2012). Advancing family business research through narrative analysis. Family Business Review, 25(3), 339-355.
• D’Este, P., Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
• D’Este, P., Rentocchini, F., Vega-Jurado, J. (2014). The role of human capital in lowering the barriers to engaging in innovation: Evidence from the Spanish innovation survey. Industry and Innovation, 21(1), 1-19.
• Donatiello, D., Ramella, F. (2017). The Innovation Paradox in Southern Europe. Unexpected Performance During the Economic Crisis. South European Society and Politics, 22(2), 1-21.
• Dosso, M., Martin, B. R., Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P. (2018). Towards evidence-based industrial research and innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 45(2), 143-150.
• Edler, J. (2007). Demand-based Innovation Policy. Manchester Business School Working Paper, No. 529.
• Edler, J., Edquist, C., Vonortas, N. S., Mikel, J. (2015b). Conclusions: lessons, limitations and way forward. En C. Edquist, N. S. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. Edler (eds.), Public Procurement for Innovation (pp. 299-307). Cheltentham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Edler, J., Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation–Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36(7), 949-963.
• Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.
• Edquist, C., Hommen, L. (1999) Systems of innovation: theory and policy from the demand side. Technology in Society, 21, 63-79.
• Edquist, C., Vonortas, N. S., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Edler, J. (eds.) (2015). Public procurement for innovation. Cheltentham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Etxezarreta, E. (2005). Sistemas regionales de innovación y cooperativismo, GEZKI, 1, 205-211.
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research policy, 29(2), 313-330.
• European Commission (2006) Pre-commercial procurement. Public sector needs as a driver of innovation. Brussels: European Commission.
• European Commission (2015). Supply and demand side innovation policies. Prepared by: Inno AG, University of Manchester (MIOIR), INNOVA Europe, SQW Limited (en línea) https://rio. jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/file/9275/download? token=u-RtiTOO (accedido en junio de 2017).
• European Commission (2016). Commission staff working document. Country report Spain 2016 (en línea). https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/ files/cr_spain_2016_en.pdf. Brussels: European Commission (accedido en junio de 2017).
• FECYT (2017): Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española 2005-2014 (en línea). https://www.fecyt.es/es/publicacion/ indicadores-bibliometricos-de-la-actividadcientifica-espanola-2005-2014 (accedido en junio de 2017).
• Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2012). Hacia un programa de investigación en sociología de la innovación. Arbor, 188(753), 5-18.
• Fernández-Zubieta, A., Ramos-Vielba, I., Zacharewicz, T. (2018). RIO Country Report 2017: Spain. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Galli, R., Teubal, M. (1997). Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems. En C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organi- zations. London: Pinter.
• García-Aracil, A., Fernández de Lucio, I. (2008). Industry-university interactions in a peripheral European region: an empirical study of Valencian firms. Regional Studies, 42(2), 215-227.
• Geisler, E. (2001). Explaining the generation and performance of intersector technology cooperation: a survey of the literature. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 13(2), 195-206.
• Giachi, S. (2017). La evolución de la gobernanza de las políticas de innovación en España: el caso de la colaboración entre ciencia e industria. Política y Gobernanza. Revista de Investigaciones y Análisis Político, 1, 109-132.
• Golf-Laville, E., Ortega-Colomer, F. J. (2012). Las fuentes de la innovación y el papel de las instituciones en el sistema de innovación de un distrito industrial. Arbor, 188(753), 75-96.
• González de la Fe, T., Hernández, N., Van Oostrom, M. (2012). Innovación, cultura y tamaño: la microempresa en una región ultraperiférica. Arbor, 188(753), 113-134.
• Heijs, J. (2001). Política tecnológica e innovación: evaluación de la financiación pública de I+D en España. Madrid: Consejo Económico Social.
• Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analyzing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413-432.
• INE (2016) Estadística sobre actividades de I+D (en línea): http://www.ine.es/dyngs/ INEbase/es/operacion.htm? c=Estadisti ca_C&cid=1254736176754&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735576669 (accedido en mayo de 2018)
• Jacob, M. et al. (2000). From Sponsorship to Partnership in Academy-Industry Relations. R&D Management, 30(3): 255-262.
• Johnson, A. (2001). Functions in innovation system approaches. Paper for DRUID’s Nelso-Winter Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.
• Kuhlmann, S., Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. (eds.)(2017). Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies: Towards Better Models. Cheltentham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Landoni, M. (2017). Innovation policy in progress. Institutional intermediation in public procurement of innovation: satellite telecommunications in Italy. R&D Management, 47(4), 583-594
• Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
• Maietta, O. W. (2015). Determinants of University-Firm R&D Collaboration and its Impact on Innovation: A Perspective from a Low-Tech Industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341-1359.
• McKelvey, M. (1997). Using evolutionary theory to define systems of innovation. En C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of innovation: growth, competitiveness and employment (pp. 200-222). London: Pinter.
• Merchán Hernández, C. (2012). Las relaciones universidad-empresa en los sistemas regionales de innovación: análisis de la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía. Sevilla: Consejo Económico y Social de Andalucía.
• Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (2015). Guía sobre compra pública innovadora. Subdirección General de Fomento de la Innovación Empresarial del Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (en línea). http://www. idi.mineco.gob.es/stfls/MICINN/Innovacion/ FICHEROS/Guia_2_0_CPI_V5_Borrador_web. pdf (accedido en agosto de 2017).
• Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.
• Mora-Valentín, E. M., Montoro-Sánchez, A., Guerras-Martín, L. A. (2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, 33(1), 17-40.
• Morales-Gualdrón, S. T., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Roig Dobón, S. (2009). The entrepreneurial motivation in academia: a multidimensional construct, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(3) 301-317.
• Mowery, D. C., Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh–Dole Act in the United States. Research Policy, 31(3) 399-418.
• Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalization. Technovation, 24(2), 153-161. Newing, H. (2010). Conducting research in conservation: Social science methods and practice. London: Routledge.
• OECD (2011). Demand-side Innovation Policies, OECD (en línea). http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/ demand-sideinnovationpolicies.htm (accedido en junio de 2017).
• Olazaran, M., Albizu, E., Otero, B. (2009). Technology Transfer between Technology Centres and SMEs: Evidence from the Basque Country. European Planning Studies, 17(3) 345-363.
• Olmos-Peñuela, J., Castro-Martínez, E., D’Este, P. (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents. Research Policy, 43(4), 696-706.
• Olmos-Peñuela, J., Molas-Gallart, J., Castro-Martínez, E. (2013). Informal collaborations between social sciences and humanities researchers and non-academic partners. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 493-506.
• Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21.
• Perkmann, M., Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280.
• Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., Macpherson, G., Baaken, T., Rampersad, G. C. (2013). The Evolution of University-Industry Linkages-A Framework. J. of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(1), 21-44
• Ponomariov, B., Boardman, C. (2012). Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management for Public to Private Knowledge Transfer: An Analytic Review of the Literature. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2012/01, Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Prodan, I., Drnovsek, M. (2010). Conceptualizing academic-entrepreneurial intentions: an empirical test. Technovation, 30(5-6), 332-347.
• Ramos-Vielba, I., Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2012). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university-industry linkages. Higher Education, 64(2), 237-265.
• Ramos-Vielba, I., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., Woolley, R. (2016). “Scientific research groups” cooperation with firms and government agencies: motivations and barriers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 558-585.
• Ribeiro, C. G., Júnior, E. I., Raun, A. T., Li, Y. (2018). Unveiling the Public Procurement Market in Brazil: A Methodological tool to measure its size and potential. Development Policy Review, 36, O360-O377.
• Sanz, L., Cruz, L., Caparrós, A. (2017). Credibilidad de la información científica y confianza de los ciudadanos en las instituciones: un diseño experimental sobre el cambio climático y las emisiones de CO 2 . En FECYT (ed.), Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología, 2016 (pp. 307-335). Madrid: FECYT.
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133.
• Tartari, V., Salter, A., D’Este, P. (2012). Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academics’ perceptions of the barriers to working with industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3), 655-677.
• Thune, T., Gulbrandsen, M. (2014). Dynamics of Collaboration in University-Industry Partnerships: Do Initial Conditions Explain Development Patterns? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 977-993.
• Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90-104.
• Uyarra, E. (2016). The impact of public procurement of innovation. Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, 355.
• Valmaseda-Andia, O., Albizu-Gallasteg, E., Fernández-Esquinas, M., Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2015). La relación entre las empresas españolas y el CSIC: motivaciones, mecanismos y beneficios desde la perspectiva empresaria. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 38(4), 109.
• Vonortas, N. S., Edquist, C. (2015). Innovation and public procurement in the United States. Public Procurement for Innovation, 147-178.
• Yeow, J., Rigby, J., Li, Y. (2017). The Effect of a Government Target for the Procurement of Innovation: The Case of the UK’s Small Business Research Initiative. En K. V. Thai (ed.), Global Public Procurement Theories and Practices (pp. 113-135). Cham: Springer International.
• Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2017). La Política de Compra Pública como Estímulo a la Innovación y el Emprendimiento. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 12(1), 100-108.
• Autio, E., Hameri, A. P., Nordberg, M. (1996). A framework of motivations for industry-big science collaboration: a case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 13(3-4), 301-314.
• Brown, A. D., Gabriel, Y., Gherardi, S. (2009). Storytelling and change: An unfolding story. Organization, 16(3), 323-33.
• Cooke, P., Morgan, K. (1998). The Associational Economy: firms, regions and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• D’Este, P., Guy, F., Lammarino, S. (2013). Shaping the Formation of University-Industry Research Collaborations: What Type of Proximity Does Really Matter? J. of Economic Geography, 13(4), 537-558.
• Edler, J., Georghiou, L., Uyarra, E., Yeow, J. (2015). The meaning and limitations of public procurement for innovation: a supplier’s experience. En C. Edquist, N. S. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. Edler (eds.), Public Procurement for Innovation (pp. 35-64). Cheltentham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Edquist, C.(2005). Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. En J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 181-208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Edquist, C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2015). Pre-commercial procurement: a demand or supply policy instrument in relation to innovation? R&D Management, 45(2), 147-160.
• Edquist, C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2015). Pre-commercial procurement: a demand or supply policy instrument in relation to innovation? R&D Management, 45(2), 147-160.
• European Commission (2009). Exploring public procurement as a strategic innovation policy mix instrument. EU project OMC-PTP (en línea). http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/telearn-digicult/ presentation-2.pdf (accedido en junio de 2017).
• Fernández-Esquinas, M. H., Yruela, M. P., Pereira, T. S. (2016). Tracing the flows of knowledge transfer: Latent dimensions and determinants of university-industry interactions in peripheral in peripheral innovation systems, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 113, 266-279.
• Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M. (2010). The “policy mix” for innovation: rethinking innovation policy in a multi-level, multi-actor context. Manchester: Manchester Business School Working Paper, Number 599.
• Li, Y. (2017). Assessing Public Procurement of Innovation as a Cross‐Domain Policy: A Framework and Application to the Chinese Context. Review of Policy Research, 34(3), 421-446.
• Maldonado, V., Lobera, J., Escrigas, C. (2009). The role of higher education in a new quadruple helix context. Triple Helix, 7, 17-19.
• Ramos-Vielba, I., Díaz-Catalán, C., Calero, J. (2014). The motivations of research teams and their cooperation with industry. Int. J. Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 13(1-2), 10-32.
• Tsipouri, L. (2012). Comparing innovation performance and science in society in the European member states. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 732-740.
• Valmaseda-Andia, O., Albizu-Gallastegi, E. (2017). El papel del CSIC en el grado de apertura de la estrategia de innovación de las empresas españolas. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40(1), 161.
• Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K., Magro, E., ZabalaIturriagagoitia, J. M. (2017). Anchoring the innovation impacts of public procurement to place: The role of conversations. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(5), 828-848.