Dependencias no locales y cadenas de verbos auxiliares

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abney, S. P. (1987): The English Noun Phrase in its Sentental Aspect. Tesis doctoral, MIT, Cambridge.
• Barbosa, P. (2001): «On Inversion in Wh-questions in Romance», en C. Aafke & J. Hulk & J.-Y. Pollock (eds.): Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20-59.
• Bleam, T. (2000): «Clitic climbing and the power of Tree Adjoining Grammar», en A. Abeille & O. Rambow (eds.): Tree Adjoining Grammars: Formalisms, linguistic analysis, and processing. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 193-220.
• Bravo, A. & L. García Fernández & D. Krivochen (2015): «On Auxiliary Chains: Auxiliaries at the Syntax-Semantics Interface», Borealis 4(2), pp. 71-101. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.4.2.3612
• Campos, H. & M. Zampini (1990): «Focalization strategies in Spanish», Probus 2(1), pp. 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1990.2.1.47
• Chomsky, N. (1957): Syntactic Structures. La Haya: Mouton.
• Chomsky, N. (1977): «On Wh-movement», en P. Culicover & A. Akmajian (eds.): Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 71-133.
• Chomsky, N. (1986): Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N. (1995): The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N. (2001): «Derivation by Phase», en M. Kenstowicz (ed.): Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 1-52.
• Chomsky, N. (2009): «Opening Remarks», en M. Piattelli-Palmarini & J. Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu (eds.): Of Minds and Language. Oxford: OUP, pp. 13-43.
• Cinque, G. (1999): Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
• Citko, B. (2014): «Multidominance», en C. Boeckx (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: OUP, pp. 119-142. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0006
• De Vries, M. (2009): «On Multidominance and Linearization», Biolinguistics 3(4), pp. 344-403.
• Emonds, J. (1970): Root and structure preserving transformations. Tesis doctoral. Cambridge: MIT.
• Emonds, J. (2007): «Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions», en J. Emonds: Discovering Syntax: Clause Structures of English, German and Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 331-380.
• Epstein, S. D. & T. D. Seely (2006): Derivations in minimalism. Cambridge: CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550607
• Escandell Vidal, M. V. & M. Leonetti (2009): «La expresión del verum focus en español», Español actual 92, pp. 11-46.
• Fillmore, C. (1963): «The Position of Embedding Transformations in a Grammar», Word 19(2), pp. 208-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659796
• Frank, R. (1992): Syntactic Locality and Tree Adjoining Grammar: Grammatical, Acquisition and Processing Perspectives. Tesis doctoral. Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania.
• Frank, R. (2002): Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5366.001.0001
• García Fernández, L. & D. G. Krivochen & A. Bravo (2017): «Aspectos de la semántica y sintaxis de las cadenas de verbos auxiliares en español», Moenia 23, pp. 1-28.
• Gómez Torrego, L. (1999): «Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo», en I. Bosque & V. Demonte (dirs.): Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, vol. 2, pp. 3323-3389.
• Grimshaw, J. (2005): Words and Structure. Stanford: CLSI, pp. 1-74.
• Guéron, J. & T. Hoekstra (1988): «T-Chains and the Constituent Structure of Auxiliaries», en A. Cardinaletti & G. Cinque & G. Giusti (eds.): Constituent Structure. Papers from the 1987 GLOW Conference. Venice: Annali di Ca’ Foscari, pp. 35-99.
• Hernanz, M. Ll. & J. M.a Brucart (1987): La Sintaxis. Barcelona: Crítica.
• Hopcroft, J. & J. Ullman (1969): Formal Languages and their relation to Automata. London: Addison-Wesley.
• Jiménez Fernández, A. (2015): «Towards a typology of focus: Subject position and microvariation at the discourse–syntax interface», Ampersand 2, pp. 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.03.001
• Jiménez Fernández, A. (en prensa): «Negative Preposing. Intervention and Parametric Variation in Complement Clauses», Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 39.
• Johnson, K. (2016): Towards a Multidominant theory of movement. Ms. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. http://people.umass.edu/kbj/homepage/Content/Multi_Movement.pdf
• Joshi, A. K. (1985): «Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions?», en D. Dowty & L. Karttunen & A. Zwicky (eds.): Natural Language Parsing. Cambridge, Mass.: CUP, pp. 206-250. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597855.007
• Joshi, A. K., & A. Kroch (1985): Linguistic significance of TAG's. Ms. Disponible en http://babel.ling.upenn.edu/papers/faculty/tony_kroch/papers/relevance3.pdf
• Karttunen, L. & M. Kay (1985): «Structure sharing with binary trees», en Proceedings of the 23rd Association for Computational Linguistics. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago, pp. 133-136. https://doi.org/10.3115/981210.981226
• Kayne, R. (1994): The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Kiparsky, P. (1968): «Linguistic universals and linguistic change», en E. Bach & R. T. Harms (eds.): Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 171-202.
• Koutsoudas, A. & G. Sanders (1979): «On the universality of rules and rule ordering constraints», Studia Linguistica 33(1), pp. 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1979.tb00676.x
• Koutsoudas, A. & G. Sanders & C. Noll (1974): «The application of phonological rules», Language 50, pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/412007
• Krivochen, D. (2015): «On Phrase Structure Building and Labeling Algorithms: Towards a Non-Uniform Theory of Syntactic Structures», The Linguistic Review 32(3), pp. 515-572. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0030
• Krivochen, D. (2018): Syntax as Graph Theory. Ms. Reading: University of Reading. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003842
• Krivochen, D. & L. García Fernández (en prensa): «Variability in syntactic-semantic cycles: evidence from auxiliary chains», en M. González Rivera & S. Sessargo (eds.): At the interface: Essays in honor of Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ladusaw, W. (1980): Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. New York: Garland.
• Lasnik, H. & M. Saito (1984): «On the nature of proper government», Linguistic Inquiry 15, pp. 235-289.
• Lasnik, H. & M. Saito (1992): Move Alpha: Conditions on its Application and Output. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Leonetti, M. & M. V. Escandell Vidal (2009): «Fronting and verum focus in Spanish», en A. Dufter & D. Jacob (eds.): Focus and Background in Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 155-204. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.112.07leo
• Levine, R. (1985): «Right Node (Non-)Raising», Linguistic Inquiry 16(3), pp. 492-497.
• May, R. (1985): Logical form: its structure and derivation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• McCawley, J. D. (1968): «Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar», Foundations of Language 4, pp. 243-269.
• McCawley, J. D. (1982): «Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure», Linguistic Inquiry 13(1), pp. 91-106.
• McCawley, J. D. (1988): The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2 vols.
• Osborne, T. (2008): «Major constituents: and two dependency grammar constraints on sharing in coordination», Linguistics 46(6), pp. 1109-1165. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.036
• Osborne, T. & M. Putnam & T. Gro? (2011): «Bare phrase structure, label-less trees, and specifier-less syntax. Is Minimalism becoming a dependency grammar?», The Linguistic Review 28(3), pp. 315-364. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.009
• Pullum, G. K. & B. C. Scholz (2001): «On the distinction between model-theoretic and generative-enumerative syntactic frameworks», en P. de Groote & G. Morrill & C. Retoré (eds.): Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics: 4th International Conference (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2099). Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 17-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48199-0_2
• RAE-ASALE (= Real Academia Española / Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española) (2009): Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
• Ringen, C. (1974): «On Arguments for Rule Ordering», Foundations of Language 8(2), pp. 266-273.
• Rizzi, L. (2010): «On Some Properties of Criterial Freezing», en P. Panagiotidis (ed.): The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators. Oxford: OUP, pp. 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584352.003.0002
• Sampson, G. (1975): «The Single Mother Condition», Journal of Linguistics 11(1), pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700004242
• Schmerling, S. F. (1983): «A new theory of English auxiliaries», en F. Heny & B. Richards (eds.): Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles. Dordrecht: Reidel, vol. II, pp. 1-53.
• Shieber, S. (1986): An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. Brookline, Mass.: Microtome Publishing.
• Sloan, K. (1991): «Quantifier-Wh Interaction», en L. Lai-Shen Cheng & H. Demirdache (eds.): More Papers on Wh-movement, MITWPL #15, pp. 219-237.
• Torrego, E. (1984): «On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects», Linguistic Inquiry 15(1), pp. 103-129.
• Uriagereka, J. (2002): «Multiple Spell-Out», en J. Uriagereka: Derivations: Exploring the Dynamics of Syntax. London: Routledge, pp. 45-65.
• Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (1992): «On the structural positions of the subject in Spanish, their nature and their consequences for quantification», en J. Ortiz de Urbina (ed.): Syntactic theory and Basque syntax. San Sebastián: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia, pp. 447-491.
• Zagona, K. (2003): The Syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: CUP.
• Zubizarreta, L. (2001): «The Constraint on Preverbal Subjects in Romance Interrogatives: A Minimality Effect», en A. C. J. Hulk & J.-Y. Pollock (eds.): Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183-204.
• Zwicky, A. & S. Isard (1963): «Some aspects of tree theory», Working Paper W-6674, Bedford, Mass: The MITRE Corporation. Disponible en: https://web.stanford.edu/~zwicky/some-aspects-of-tree-theory.pdf