Frames of reference for the electoral Debates of the 2015 and 2016 general elections in Spaincredibility as the sustenance of satisfaction with politicians

  1. Arceo Vacas, Alfredo 1
  2. Serrano Villalobos, Olga 1
  3. Álvarez Sánchez, Sergio 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Zer: Revista de estudios de comunicación = Komunikazio ikasketen aldizkaria

ISSN: 1137-1102

Ano de publicación: 2020

Volume: 25

Número: 48

Páxinas: 105-125

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1387/ZER.21297 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Zer: Revista de estudios de comunicación = Komunikazio ikasketen aldizkaria

Resumo

This work describes the perception contexts of the two main electoral debates for the Spanish general elections of 2015 and 2016, together with the tactics of the candidates to gain credibility and to successfully negotiate their communicative frames. Electoral polls were revised; descriptive analyses of political advertising and the debates themselves were performed. To explore credibility attributions, two focus groups were conducted with young actuants. Finally, several content analyses were practized on the tweets of the candidates, whose conflict frames got the voters tired. However, for young people, then incumbent president Mariano Rajoy looked more credible due to his naturalness. 

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alonso, M. (2017). Predicción política y Twitter: elecciones generales de España 2015. ZER Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 22(43), 13-30. doi: 10.1387/zer.16298
  • Arceo, J. L. (1993). Campañas para elecciones generales: introducción. In J. L. Arceo (dir.), Campañas electorales y "publicidad política" en España (1976-1991) (pp. 17-21). Barcelona: Escuela Superior de Relaciones Públicas.
  • Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Michigan: Free Press.
  • Berganza, M. R. (2008). Medios de comunicación, "espiral del cinismo" y desconfianza política. Estudio de caso de la cobertura mediática de los comicios electorales europeos. ZER Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 13(25), 13-30. Recuperado de https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/3580/3208
  • Berrocal, S., Redondo, M., Martín, V., & Campos, E. (2014). La presencia del infoentretenimiento en los canales generalistas de la TDT española. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 69, 85-103. doi: 10.4185/RLCS-2014-1002
  • Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between frame setting and frame sending: how journalists contribute to news frames. Annals of the International Communication Association, 27(1), 293-335. doi: 10.1111/comt.12027
  • Cappella, J. N., &Jamieson, K. H. (1996). News frames, political cynicism, and media cynicism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 71-84. doi: 10.1177/0002716296546001007
  • Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: the press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Chadwick, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Vaccari, C. (2017). Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 220-239. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2017.1309415
  • Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460-473. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460
  • Coleman, S., & Moss, G. (2016). Rethinking election debates: what citizens are entitled to expect. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(1), 3-24. doi: 10.1177/1940161215609732
  • Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041-1066. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00100
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasión: psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635-650. doi: 10.1086/266350
  • Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Johnston, J. (2017). The public interest: a new way of thinking for public relations? Public Relations Enquiry, 6(1), 5-22. doi: 10.1177/2046147X16644006
  • L'Etang, J. (2008). Public relations: concepts, practice and critique. Londres: Sage.
  • Mazzoleni, G. (1998). La comunicazione politica. Bologne: Il Mulino.
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Annals of the International Communication Association, 27(1), 293-335. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029
  • Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
  • O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G.M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (eds.), Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
  • Strömback, J., & Kiousis, S. (2011). Political public relations: defining and mapping an emergent field. In J. Strömback, & S. Kiousis (eds.), Political Public Relations. Principles and Applications (pp. 1-32). New York and London: Routledge.
  • Taylor, M. (2010). Public relations in the enactment of civil society. n R. Heath (ed.), The Sage handbook of public relations (pp. 5-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O'Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041-1061. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12187
  • Yanes, R. (2006). Límites éticos del mensaje persuasivo en la comunicación política. ZER Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 11(20), 57-69. Recuperado de https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/3746/3376