La influencia diferencial de las redes sociales en la participación social de mujeres y varones

  1. Dávila de León, María Celeste 1
  2. Zlobina, Anna 1
  3. Alvarez Hernández, Gloria 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ths8210

Revista:
Redes: Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales

ISSN: 1579-0185

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: El análisis de redes en las ciencias del comportamiento

Volumen: 31

Número: 1

Páginas: 1-18

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/REDES.835 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Redes: Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales

Resumen

El propósito de este trabajo es analizar el perfil de las redes personales de mujeres y varones en cuanto a la participación social de sus contactos, y el diferente papel que pueden tener sus contactos débiles y fuertes a la hora de explicar la intención de desarrollar diversas formas de participación social. A través de una encuesta on-line 263 estudiantes universitarios actualmente no involucrados en ninguna forma de participación social estimaron la probabilidad de su futura implicación en ciertos tipos de participación social y aportaron el número aproximado de familiares, amigos y conocidos que desarrollaban cada tipo. Esta última información fue utilizada para calcular el grado de centralidad de los sujetos en sus redes sociales considerando los vínculos fuertes y débiles. Los análisis llevados a cabo confirman que mujeres y varones presentan diferencias en sus redes sociales. Sólo los vínculos débiles son predictores significativos de la intención de desarrollar la participación, pero hay diferencias por tipo de participación social y por género. La influencia de los vínculos sociales es significativa si el tipo de participación social se ajusta al estereotipo de rol de género. Se discuten los resultados a la luz de la aproximación focus norm y la influencia social normativa.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Álvarez-Hernández, G. (2016). Crear y compartir conocimiento en redes sociales empresariales: Factores personales y organizacionales clave en una comunidad de práctica virtual. Tesis doctoral no publicada: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Arias, A. y Barrón, A. (2004). El apoyo social en la predicción a corto y medio plazo de la permanencia del voluntariado socioasistencial. Psicothema, 20(1), 97-103.
  • Bem, S.L. (1981). Gender Schema Theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.
  • Berlan, M.R. (2016). Does Gender Equality Influence Volunteerism?: A Cross-National Analysis of Women’s Volunteering Habits and Gender Equality. Voluntas, 27(2), 853-873.
  • Bonan, C. y Guzman, V. (2007). Aportes de la teoría de género a la comprensión de las dinámicas sociales y los temas específicos de asociatividad y participación, identidad y poder. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios de la Mujer‐CEM.
  • Brandes, U. (2016). Network position. Methodological Innovations, 9, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116630650
  • Brighmann et al. (2018). What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329 129039_What_do_centrality_measures_measure_in_psychological_networks. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25024.58884
  • Brussino, S., Rabbia, H.H. y Sorribas, P. (2009). Perfiles Sociocognitivos de la participación política de los Jóvenes. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 43(2), 279-287.
  • Caiazza, A. y Putnam, R.D. (2005). Women's Status and Social Capital in the United States. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 27(1-2), 69-84.
  • Cassese, E.C. y Holman, M.R. (2016). Religious Beliefs, Gender Consciousness, and Women’s Political Participation. Sex Roles, 75, 514–527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199- 016-0635-9
  • Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS). (2014). Actitudes de la juventud en España hacia la participación y el voluntariado. Estudio nº 3039. Recuperado de http://www.cis.es/cis/export/sites/default/Archivos/Marginales/3020_3039/3039/es3039 mar.pdf
  • Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., y Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201-234). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., y Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.58.6.1015
  • Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C., y Born, M. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.10.002
  • Coffé, H. y Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation. Sex Roles, 62, 318-333. DOI 10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y
  • Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26
  • Efron, B., y Tibshirani, R. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, London.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th ed., SAGE, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Gil, H. y Valenzuela, S. (2011). The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384984
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The Strength of Weak Ties. Social Networks, 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-442450- 0.50025-0
  • Greenslade, J.H. y White, K.M. (2005). The prediction of above-average participation in volunteerism: A test of the Theory of Planned Behavior an the volunteers Functions Inventory in older Australian adults. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145 (2), 155- 172. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.2.155-172.
  • Henn, M. y Foard, N. (2014). Social differentiation in young people’s political participation: the impact of social and educational factors on youth political engagement in Britain. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.8307 04
  • Karp, J. y Banducci, S.A. (2008). When politics is not just a man’s game: Women’s representation and political engagement. Electoral Studies, 27, 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.0
  • Kashimaa, Y., Wilsonc, S., Lusher, D., Pearsonb, L.J. y Pearsonb, C. (2013). The acquisition of perceived descriptive norms as social category learning in social networks. Social Networks, 35, 711–719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.06.0
  • Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Zin, T. T., y Reese, D. D. (2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083- 6101.2005.tb00266.x
  • Kende, A. (2016). Separating Social Science Research on Activism from Social Science as Activism. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 399- 412. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12172
  • Lewis V.A., MacGregor, C.A., y Putnam, R.D. (2013). Religion, Networks, and Neighborliness: The Impact of Religious Social Networks on Civic Engagement. Social Science Research, 42(2), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09. 011
  • Lim, C. (2008). Social networks and political participation: How do networks matter? Social Forces, 87(2), 961-982. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0143
  • Lowndes, V. (2004). Getting On or Getting By? Women, Social Capital and Political Participation. The British Journal of Political and International Relations, 6(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 856X.2004.00126.x
  • Marien, S., Hooghe, M.H. y Quintelier, E. (2010). Inequalities in Non-institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-level Analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 58, 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9248.2009.00801.x
  • Marzana, D., Marta, E. y Pozzi, M. (2012). Social action in young adults: Voluntary and political engagement. Journal of Adolescence, 35(3),497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.08.013
  • Moreno-Jiménez, P. (2015). Citizen participation according to causal perceptions of third-world poverty, belief in a just world and gender system justification. Australian Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12093
  • Neal, Z.P. y Watling, J. (2017). Network Analysis in Community Psychology: Looking Back, Looking Forward. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60, 279-295. DOI 10.1002/ajcp.12158
  • O´Neill, B. y Gidengil, E. (2006). Gender and social capital. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203955949.
  • Observatorio de la Juventud en España (2017). Jóvenes, participación y cultura política. Sondeo de opinión, 2017.1. Recuperado de http://www.injuve.es/sites/default/files/2018/27/publicaciones/sondeo_2017-1_informe.pdf
  • Observatorio del Voluntariado (2019). La acción voluntaria en 2018. Madrid: Plataforma del Voluntariado de España.
  • Paik, A. y Navarre-Jackson, L. (2011). Social networks, recruitment, and volunteering: Are social capital effects conditional on recruitment? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 476-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009354647
  • Pardo, A. y Ruiz, M.A. (2002). SPSS 11: Guía para el análisis de datos. Madrid: McGraw-Hill
  • Pavlova, M.K. y Silvereisen, R.K. (2015). Supportive Social Contexts and Intentions for Civic and Political Participation: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 432-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2223
  • Piccoli, N. y Rollero, C. (2010). Public Involvement in Social and Political Participation Processes: A Gender Perspective. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(3),167-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1027
  • Pugliesi, K. y Shook, S.L. (1998). Gender, ethnicity, and networks characteristics: Variation in social support resources. Sex Roles, 38(3/4), 215-238.
  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
  • Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., y Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.64.1.104
  • Serrat, R., Petriwskyj, A., Villar, F. y Warburton, J. (2017). Barriers to the retention of older participants in political organisations: evidence from Spain. Ageing and Society, 37(3). 581-606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001361
  • Smith, J.R. et al. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 353-361. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.001
  • Smith, J.R. y Louis, W.R. (2010). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude– behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 647-666. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X269748
  • Smith, S.S. (2000). Mobilizing social resources: Race, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Social Capital and Persisting Wage Inequalities. The Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 509-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533- 8525.2000.tb00071.x
  • Son, J., y Lin, N. (2008). Social capital and civic action: A network-based approach. Social Science Research, 37, 330-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.12.004
  • Stukas, A A., Snyder, M., y Clary, E. G. (published online, March 2014). Volunteerism and community involvement: Antecedents, experiences, and consequences for the person and the situation. In D. A. Schroeder & W. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.0 12
  • Timberlake, S. (2005). Social capital and gender in the workplace. The Journal of Management Development, 24(1/2), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510572335
  • Tindall, D.B. (2002). Social Networks, identification and participation in an environmental movement: Low-medium cost activism within the British Columbia Wilderness Preservation Movement. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Antropology, 39 (4), 413-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755- 618X.2002.tb00628.x
  • Tseng, S. y Hsieh, Y.P. (2015).The implications of networked individualism for social participation: How mobile phone, Email, and IM networks afford social participation for rural residents in Taiwan. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(9), 1157- 1172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215580620
  • Valente, T.W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18(1), 69-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378- 8733(95)00256-1
  • Verba, S., Burns, N. y Schlozman, L. (1997). Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement. The Journal of Politics, 59(4), 1051-1072. DOI: 10.2307/2998592
  • Wang, L., y Graddy, E. (2008). Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving. Voluntas, 19(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-008-9055-y
  • Wang, L. y Handy, F. (2014). Religious and secular voluntary participation by immigrants in Canada: how trust and social networks affect decision to participate. Voluntas, 25, 6, 1559–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9428-8
  • Warburton, J. y Terry, D. J. (2000). Volunteer decision making by older people: A test of a revised theory of planned behaviour. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 245– 257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/153248300510361 35
  • Wemlinger, E. y Berlan, M.R. (2015). Does Gender Equality Influence Volunteerism? A Cross-National Analysis of Women’s Volunteering. Voluntas, 27(2), 853-873.
  • Zani, B. y Barrett, M. (2012). Introduction engaged citizens? Political participation and social engagement among youth, women, minorities, and migrants. Human Affairs, 22, 273-282. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-012-0023-2.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet