Medida de la competencia para programar AICLE y diagnóstico de las necesidades de formación docente

  1. Magdalena Custodio Espinar 1
  2. José Manuel García Ramos 2
  1. 1 Universidad Pontificia Comillas
    info

    Universidad Pontificia Comillas

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/017mdc710

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Bordón: Revista de pedagogía

ISSN: 0210-5934,  2340-6577

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 72

Issue: 1

Pages: 31-48

Type: Article

DOI: 10.13042/BORDON.2019.72250 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Bordón: Revista de pedagogía

Abstract

In a context of remarkable heterogeneity in the training received to teach CLIL, this article presents the process of design and validation of a questionnaire that aims to measure the level of integration of the CLIL methodological principles in the programming styles of qualified/accredited teachers in bilingual schools. METHOD. The objective is to measure teachers’ competence to program CLIL and diagnose the areas that require training. In order to do that, it has been necessary to define what “CLIL programming” involves based on a CLIL lesson plan model that integrates the core methodological principles of this approach. This has served to design the initial structure of the questionnaire that was submitted to validation by experts. The validation process allowed reducing the number of items and improving their clarity, precision and relevance. The resulting questionnaire was applied to a stratified random sample of 383 teachers, from 47 bilingual primary and secondary schools, distributed in the five administrative districts in which the Community of Madrid is organised. RESULTS. The analyses have shown that the questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to collect the information sought and has allowed the designing of a final version of the questionnaire named CIPMA (Cuestionario de Integración de los Principios Metodológicos AICLE). DISCUSSION. All this leads to the conclusion that CIPMA is a validated questionnaire ready to be applied in other contexts (with other samples) in order to measure teachers’ competence to plan CLIL lessons and to diagnose their training needs. This strategy of measuring teachers’ competence and diagnosing specific teachers’ training needs can contribute to a greater homogenization of the teaching competence to program CLIL lessons in bilingual schools.

Bibliographic References

  • ○ Ball, P., Kelly, K. y Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • ○ Banegas, D. L. (2012). CLIL teacher development: challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 5(1), 46-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.1.4
  • ○ Banegas, D. L. (2015). Sharing views of CLIL lesson planning in language teacher education. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 8(2), 104-130. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.3
  • ○ Bertaux, P., Coonan, C. M., Frigols-Martín, M. J. y Mehisto, P. (2010). The CLIL teacher’s competences grid. Common Constitution and Language Learning (CCLL) Comenius Network.
  • ○ Comisión Europea (1995). Libro Blanco enseñar y aprender: hacia la sociedad del conocimiento. Bruselas, Luxemburgo: Comisión Europea.
  • ○ Comunidad de Madrid (2014). Datos y cifras de la educación 2013-2014. Madrid: Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte.
  • ○ Coyle, D. (2011). Setting the CLIL agenda for successful learning: what pupils have to say. En II Congreso Internacional de Enseñanza Bilingüe en Centros Educativos. Madrid: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.
  • ○ Coyle, D., Hood, P. y Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ○ Custodio Espinar, M. (2012). Appendix C. Lesson planning: CLIL Young learner lesson. En J. Harmer (ed.), Essential Teacher Knowledge (pp. 251-252). Inglaterra: Pearson.
  • ○ Custodio Espinar, M. (2019). Los principios metodológicos AICLE (aprendizaje integrado de contenido y lengua). Madrid: Fundación Universitaria Española.
  • ○ Delicado, G. y Pavón, V. (2016). Training primary student teachers for CLIL: innovation through collaboration. Pulso. Revista de Educación, 39, 35-57.
  • ○ Escobar, C. (2011). Colaboración interdisciplinar, partenariado y centros de formación docente: tres ejes para sustentar la colaboración del profesorado AICLE. En C. Escobar Urmeneta y L. Nussbaum (eds.), Learning through another language. Bellaterra: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  • ○ Herrero Rámila, C. (2015). El programa de colegios bilingües de la Comunidad de Madrid. Un análisis del proceso de cambio ocurrido a través de sus profesores (tesis doctoral). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.
  • ○ Jover, G., Fleta, T. y González, R. (2016). La formación inicial de los maestros de Educación Primaria en el contexto de la enseñanza bilingüe en lengua extranjera. Bordón, Revista de Pedagogía, 68(2), 121-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2016.68208
  • ○ Kelly, M., Grenfell, M., Allan, R., Kriza, C. y McEvoy, W. (2004). European profile for language teacher education – a frame of reference. Report to the European Commission for Education and Culture. Recuperado de ec.europa.eu/education/languages/archive/doc/profile_en.pdf.
  • ○ Lancaster, N. K. (2016). The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning on the Oral Skills of Compulsory Secondary Education Students: A Longitudinal Study (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Jaén, Jaén.
  • ○ Llinares, A. y Dafouz, E. (2010). Content and language integrated programs in the Madrid region: Overview and research findings. En D. Lagasabaster y Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training (pp. 95-114). Newcastle, Inglaterra: Cambridge Scholars.
  • ○ Llull, J., Fernández, R., Johnson, M. y Peñafiel, E. (2016). Planning for CLIL: Designing effective lessons for the bilingual classroom. Madrid: CCS.
  • ○ López Hernández, A. (2016). Language Analysis for English and CLIL Teachers: A Practical Guide. Madrid: Editorial CCS.
  • ○ Madrid, D. y Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL Teacher Training. En J. de D. Martínez Agudo (ed.), Teaching and Learning English through Bilingual Education. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
  • ○ Madrid Manrique, M. y Madrid Fernández, D. (2014). La formación inicial del profesorado para la educación bilingüe. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
  • ○ Marsh, D. (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). A Development Trajectory. Córdoba: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba.
  • ○ Marsh, D. y Langé, G. (eds.) (2000). Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. Finlandia: University of Jyväskylä.
  • ○ Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D. y Frigols, M. J. (2010). European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education: A framework for the professional development of CLIL teachers. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
  • ○ Mehisto, P., Marsh, D. y Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
  • ○ Morton, T. (2016). Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4(2), 144-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.2.01
  • ○ Navés, T. y Victori, M. (2010). CLIL in Catalonia: an overview of research studies. En D. Lasagabaster y Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training (pp. 30-55). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • ○ Pavón Vázquez, V. y Ellison, M. (2013). Examining teacher roles and competences in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Linguarum Arena, 4, 65-78.
  • ○ Pérez, E. R. y Medrano, L. (2010). Análisis Factorial Exploratorio: Bases Conceptuales y Metodológicas. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC), 2(1), 58-66.
  • ○ Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2014). Teacher training needs for bilingual education: in-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 266-295.
  • ○ Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2015). Training teachers for plurilingual education: A Spanish case study. En D. Marsh, M. L. Pérez Cañado y J. Ráez Padilla (eds.), CLIL in Action: Voices from the Classroom (pp. 165-187). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • ○ Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2016). Evaluating CLIL Programmes: Instrument Design and Validation. Pulso. Revista de educación, 39, 79-112.
  • ○ Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2018). Innovations and Challenges in CLIL Teacher Training. Theory into Practice, 57(3), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1492238
  • ○ Pérez-Gil, J., Chacón Moscoso, S. y Moreno Rodríguez, R. (2000). Validez de constructo: el uso del análisis factorial exploratorio-confirmatorio para obtener evidencias de validez. Psicothema, 12(2), 442-446.
  • ○ Real Decreto 126/2014, de 28 de febrero, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Primaria. Boletín Oficial del Estado, de 1 de marzo de 2014, n.º 52, pp. 19349-19420.
  • ○ Real Decreto 1105/2014, de 26 de diciembre, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y del Bachillerato. Boletín Oficial del Estado, de 3 de enero de 2015, n.º 3, pp. 169-546.
  • ○ Wolff, D. (2012). The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Synergies Italie, 8, 105-116.
Data source: Dialnet