Los MOOC como herramientas educomunicativas para el desarrolloUna revisión de las iniciativas de EEUU, Japón y Europa

  1. Cabezuelo Lorenz, Francisco
  2. Manfredi Sánchez, Juan Luis
Revista:
CIC: Cuadernos de información y comunicación

ISSN: 1135-7991,  1988-4001

Ano de publicación: 2018

Número: 23

Páxinas: 175-188

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5209/CIYC.60684 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: CIC: Cuadernos de información y comunicación

Resumo

This paper proposes the use of MOOCs as an educational tool and international strategy to end the educational inequalities and the digital divide. The methodology focuses on the analysis of academic literature and previous research on the field of the new international digital tools. As well, this paper focuses on the case-study and compared strategies followed by the United States, the European Union and Japan. It tries to define and contextualize their decisions, risks and opportunities. The novelty of the work is the approach to MOOCs envisaged as a tool for the new digital cooperation and diplomacy and its implications for the possible reduction of socio-educational inequalities.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Advisory Committee on Cultural Diplomacy (2005). Cultural Diplomacy. The Linchpin of Public Diplomacy, 17-3-2014, p. 7. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/54374.pdf
  • Aguaded, I. (2013). The MOOC Revolution: A New Form of Education from the Technological Paradigm? Comunicar, 21(41), 07-08. (DOI: http://doi.org/tnh).
  • Awad, I. Domínguez, M. y Bulnes, A. (2013). Dirigentas de campamento y actividad mediática: más allá de internet. Cuadernos.info, 33, 29-42. DOI: 10.7764/cdi.33.534
  • Barth, R. S. (1972). Open Education and the American School. New York: Agathon Press, Inc.
  • Campbell, L. (2004). Engaging with the Learning Object Economy. In A. Littlehorn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A Sustainable Approach to E-learning (pp. 35-45). London: Routledge. (http://goo.gl/303GCK) (16-04-2014).
  • Castells, M. (2008). Comunicación, poder y contrapoder en la sociedad red (I). Los medios y la política. TELOS: Cuadernos de comunicación e innovación, 74, pp.13-24.
  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.23.
  • Chiappe-Laverde, Hine y Martínez-Silva (2015). Literature and Practice: A Critical Review of MOOCs. Revista Comunicar, 44. Vol. 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-01
  • Comisión Europea (2014a): Vassiliou acoge con satisfacción el lanzamiento de los primeros MOOC a nivel universitario. (Noticia del 18-3-2014). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-349_es.htm
  • Comisión Europea (2014b): About Start up Europe. (Noticia del 18-3-2014) https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/about-startup-europe
  • D’Antoni, S. (2009). Open Educational Resources: Reviewing Initiatives and Issues. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 24(1), 3-10. (DOI: http://doi.org/fwfdc2).
  • Espinosa, J. M. (1975). Inter-American Beginnings of U.S. Cultural Diplomacy, 1936-1948. Department of State Washington, D.C., p.342.
  • González Oñate. C., Fanjul-Peyró, C. & Cabezuelo-Lorenzo, F. (2015). Use, Consumption and Knowledge of New Technologies by Elderly People in France, UK and Spain. Revista Comunicar. Nº 45. DOI: 10.3916/C45-2015-02
  • Gstöhl, S. (2012). Diplomacy in the 21st Century Is Network Diplomacy, Crossroads, III (2), pp. 49-58.
  • Heine, J. (2008). On the Manner of Practising the New Diplomacy. En Cooper, A., Hocking, B. & Maley, W. (Eds.): Global Governance and Diplomacy: Worlds Apart? Palgrave Macmillan, Baskingstoke (EEUU), pp. 271-287.
  • Institute for Public Policy Research (2013). An avalanche is coming: Higher education and the revolution ahead. Noticia del 18-3-2014. Disponible en la web: http://www.ippr.org/images/media/files/publication/2013/04/avalanche-is-coming_Mar2013_10432.pdf
  • Japan Exchange & Teaching Program (2014). Welcome. Noticia del 18-3-2014. Disponible en la web: http://www.jetprogramme.org/e/introduction/statistics.html
  • Lehman, R. (2007). Learning Object Repositories. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 113, 57-66. (DOI: http://doi.org/dfx2fb).
  • Manheim, J. B. (1994). Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: the Evolution of the Influence. Oxford University Press: New York.
  • McLelland, M. (2014). Ethical and legal issues in teaching about Japanese popular culture to undergraduate students in Australia, Electronic journal of contemporary japanese studies, 13 (2).
  • McMorran, C. (2013). Teaching Japanese Popular Culture in the MOOC World. Possibilities and Challenges, Electronic journal of contemporary japanese studies, 13(2).
  • Otake, T. (2010). Thinking aloud, en The Japan Times, 19.09.2010, http://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2010/09/19/to-be-sorted/thinking-aloud/#.UbWXj-C9f3G
  • Pamment, J. (2014). Articulating influence: Toward a research agenda for interpreting the evaluation of soft power, public diplomacy and nation brands, Public Relations Review, 40, p.58.
  • Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC, en The New York Times, 02.10.2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?smid=pl-
  • Sonenshine, T. (2014). Bottom Line Diplomacy Why Public Diplomacy Matters, 18-3-2014, http://www.state.gov/r/remarks/2013/210771.htm
  • Stengel, R. (2014). A message to the public diplomacy community, 18-3-2014, http://takefiveblog.org/2014/02/19/a-message-to-the-public-diplomacy-community-from-richard-stengel-under-secretary-for-public-diplomacy-and-public-affairs
  • Walberg, H. J. & Thomas, S. C. (1972). Open Education: An Operational Definition and Validation in Great Britain and United States. American Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 197-208. (DOI: http://doi.org/czcqr6).
  • Whittemore, R. & Knafl, K. (2005). The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. (DOI: http://doi.org/dhbpb8).
Fonte de datos: Dialnet