Ergonomía y trabajadores mayores

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ball, K. y Owsley, C. (1992). The useful field of view test: A new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 64, 71-79.
• Beales, P. H. (1965). Noise, Hearing and Deafness. London: Michael Joseph.
• Belsky, J. (2001). Psicología del Envejecimiento. Madrid: Paraninfo.
• Brant, L. J. y Fozard, J. L. (1990). Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 813-820.
• Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information-processing rate. En J. E. Birren y K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (3rd ed) (pp. 201-221). San Diego: Academic Press.
• Fisk, A.D.; Rogers, W.A.; Charness, N.; Czaja, S.J. & Sharit, J. (2004). Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factor Approaches. London. CRC Press.
• Fozard, J. L. (2000). Sensory and cognitive changes with age. En K. W. Schaie y M. Pietrucha (Eds.), Mobility and transportation in the elderly (pp. 1-61). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
• Haigh, R. (1993). The ageing process: A challenge for design. Applied Ergonomics, 24, 9-14.
• Horn, J. y Catell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253-270.
• ILO (2006). Conditions of Work and employment for older workers in industrialized countries: Understanding the issues. Ginebra. International Labour Office.
• IMSERSO (2004). Las Personas Mayores en España. Madrid. IMSERSO (Instituto de Mayores y Servicios Sociales).
• Kinsella, K. & Velkoff, V.A. (2001). An Aging World: 2001. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Lillo, J. (2000). Ergonomía: Evaluación y Diseño del Entorno visual. Madrid: Alianza.
• Lillo, J., & Moreira, H. (2005). Relative luminance and figure-background segmentation problems: Using AMLA to avoid no-discernible stimuli pairs in common and colour blind observers. Psicológica , 26, 189-207.
• Lillo, J. y Moreira, H. (2006). Diseño de objetos y entornos para personas mayores. En M. Amérigo y B. Cortés (Eds). Entre la Persona y el Entorno. Tenerife. Resma.
• Pinto, M. R.; De Medici, S.; Van Sant, C.; Bianchi, A.; Zlotnicki, A. y Napoli, C. (2000). Ergonomics, gerontechnology and design for the home-environment. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 317-322.
• Prosser, S.; Turrini, M. y Arslan, E. (1990). Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly. Acta Oto-Larungologica, 476 (Suppl.), 136-142.
• Sagawa, K. y Takahashi, Y. (2001). Spectral luminous efficiency as a function of age. Journal of the Optical Society of America-A, 18, 2659-2667.
• Scialfa, C. T.; Kline, D. W. y Lyman, B. J. (1987). Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: Examination of the useful field of view. Psychology and Aging, 2, 14-19.
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1997). Design for People with Functional Limitations Resulting from Disability, Aging or Circumstance. En G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 2010-2052). New York: Willey.
• Vaughan, N. E. y Letowski, T. (1997). Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 1192-1200.