La innovación social como motor de la creación de empresas

  1. Daniel Alonso-Martínez
  2. Nuria Gonzalez-Alvarez
  3. Mariano Nieto
Revista:
Universia Business Review

ISSN: 1698-5117

Año de publicación: 2015

Número: 47

Páginas: 48-63

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Universia Business Review

Resumen

El trabajo pone de manifiesto la necesidad de crear entornos socialmente innovadores con el fin de incentivar la creación empresarial de una región. Está demostrado que este tipo de entornos favorece la creación e implantación de nuevas empresas, mejorar la riqueza económica y social del lugar, y contribuye tecnológicamente al desarrollo de las regiones. Por este motivo, este trabajo pone de manifiesto estos aspectos, pretende demostrarlos empíricamente, a partir de una muestra de 24 países entre los años 2005 y 2012.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, D., Hess, M. (2010). "Social innovation and why it has policy significance". The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 21(2), 139-155.
  • Anokhin, S., Schulze, W. S. (2009). "Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption". Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 465-476.
  • Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., Audretsch, D. (2015). "Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence". Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (In-press).
  • Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Bradley, S. W., McMullen, J. S., Artz, K., Simiyu, E. M. (2012). "Capital is not enough: Innovation in developing economies". Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 684-717.
  • Brenkert, G. (2009). "Innovation, rule breaking and the ethics of entrepreneurship". Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 448-464.
  • Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). "Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework". Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51.
  • Crawford, G. C., Aguinis, H., Lichtenstein, B., Davidsson, P., McKelvey, B. (2015). "Power law distributions in entrepreneurship: Implications for theory and research". Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 696-713.
  • Dorado, S., Ventresca, M. J. (2013). "Crescive entrepreneurship in complex social problems: Institutional conditions for entrepreneurial engagement". Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 69-82.
  • Edquist, C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). "Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy". Research Policy, 41(10), 1757-1769.
  • Edwards-Schachter, M. E., Matti, C. E., Alcántara, E. (2012). "Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case". Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672-692.
  • Foray, D. (2015). "Common innovation (how we create the wealth of nations) in the light of reflections on mass flourishing (how grassroots innovation created jobs, challenge, and change)". Research Policy, 44(7), 1403-1405.
  • Herrera, M. E. B. (2015). "Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation". Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1468-1474.
  • Igarashi, Y., Okada, M. (2015). "Social innovation through a dementia project using innovation architecture". Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 97, 193-204.
  • Lisetchi, M., Brancu, L. (2014). "The entrepreneurship concept as a subject of social innovation". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124(0), 87-92.
  • Luo, Y. (2006). "Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: A structuration perspective". Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 747-766.
  • Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., Mulgan, G. (2010). “The open book of social innovation” National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Art.
  • Ng, A., Ibrahim, M. H., Mirakhor, A. (2015). "Ethical behavior and trustworthiness in the stock market-growth nexus". Research in International Business and Finance, 33, 44-58.
  • O'Connor, A. (2013). "A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: Meeting government and economic purposes". Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 546-563.
  • Pache, A., Santos, F. (2013). "Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics". Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972.
  • Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., Miller, D. T. (2008). “Rediscovering social innovation”. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6, 34-43.
  • Porter, M., Kramer, M. R. (2011). "Creating shared value". Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
  • Sarasvathy, S., Venkataraman, S. (2009). "Made, as well as found: Researching entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial". Yale University Press: York JG,
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). “Theorie der wirtschaftlichen entwicklung”. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  • York, J. G., Venkataraman, S. (2010). "The entrepreneur–environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation". Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 449-463.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet