Adaptación española de la versión reducida multicanal del Perfil de Sensibilidad No Verbal (MiniPONS)

  1. Martínez-Sánchez, Francisco
  2. García Fernández-Abascal, Enrique
  3. Martínez-Modia, Juan C.
Aldizkaria:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728 1695-2294

Argitalpen urtea: 2013

Alea: 29

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 604-613

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.29.2.161851 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Anales de psicología

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

En este trabajo se presenta la adaptación española de la versión reducida multicanal del Perfil de Sensibilidad No Verbal (MiniPONS) (Bänziger, Scherer, Hall y Rosenthal, 2011). Esta escala evalúa las diferen-cias individuales en la habilidad para reconocer emociones, actitudes inter-personales y comunicación de intenciones por canales no verbales. Esta versión multicanal reducida está compuesta por 64 estímulos no verbales de vídeo y/o audio que representan a una mujer en blanco y negro. El princi-pal objetivo de este estudio es analizar las propiedades psicométricas del MiniPONS empleando para ello una amplia muestra de participantes (N = 1154) de entre 18 a 60 años, también se examinaron las diferencias en la sensibilidad no verbal en función del sexo y la edad. Se presentan los valo-res normativos, la fiabilidad y validez en tres estudios con 168, 254 y 1154 estudiantes universitarios. Los resultados muestran que las mujeres obtie-nen mejores puntuaciones en todas las condiciones estimulares, éstas no sólo procesan más eficientemente información emocional no verbal por ca-nales unisensoriales (rostro, cuerpo, voz), si no que también la integran me-jor. Los resultados indican que la versión española del MiniPONS presenta unas propiedades psicométricas similares a la escala original, mostrando moderada consistencia interna y fiabilidad test-retest, así como también una razonable validez convergente obtenida en las correlaciones con otras pruebas que evalúan la capacidad de reconocimiento emocional. Se conclu-ye que la versión española del MiniPONS es un instrumento que evalúa adecuadamente la sensibilidad no verbal. Se discuten las limitaciones y po-tencial utilidad de la escala.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Acoach, L. C. y Webb, L. M. (2004). The influence of language brokering on Hispanic teenagers' acculturation, academic performance, and nonverbal decoding skills: a preliminary study. The Howard Journal of Communication, 15, 1-19.
  • Bagby, R.M., Parker, J.D. y Taylor, G.J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38(1), 23-32.
  • Bänziger, T., Grandjean, D. y Scherer, K. R. (2009). Emotion recognition from expressions in face, voice, and body: The Multimodal Emotion Recognition Test (MERT). Emotion, 9(5), 691-704.
  • Bänziger, T., Scherer, K. R., Hall, J. A. y Rosenthal, R. (2011). Introducing the MiniPONS: A Short Multichannel Version of the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS). Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(3), 189-204.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y. y Plumb, I. (2001). The 'reading the mind in the eyes' test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241-251.
  • Barrett, L.F., Lane, R.D., Sechrest, L. y Schwartz, G.E. (2000). Sex differences in emotional awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1027-1035.
  • Bauer, P., Stennes, L., y Haight, J. (2003). Representation of the inner self in autobiography: Women's and men's use of internal states language in personal narratives. Memory, 11(1), 27-42.
  • Belin, P., Fillion-Bilodeau, S. y Gosselin, F. (2008). The montreal affective voices: A validated set of nonverbal affect bursts for research on auditory affective processing. Behavioural Research Methods, 40(2), 531-539.
  • Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales? Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 291-294.
  • Bradley, M. M. y Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology, 37, 204-215.
  • Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D. y Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 300-319.
  • Buck, R. (1976). A test of nonverbal receiving ability: Preliminary studies. Human Communication Research, 2(2), 162-171.
  • Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Saint-Amour, D., Lepore, F. y Lassonde, M. (2010). Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 220-225.
  • DiMatteo, M. R., Friedman, H. S., y Taranta, A. (1979). Sensitivity to bodily non-verbal communication as a factor in practitioner-patient rapport. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4(1), 18-26.
  • DiMatteo, M. R., Hays, R. D. y Prince, L. M. (1986). Relationship of physician's nonverbal communi- cation skill to patient satisfaction, appointment noncompliance, and physician workload. Health Psychology, 5(6), 581-594.
  • Ekman, P. y Friesen, W.V. (1976). Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
  • Erceg-Hurn, D. M. y Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to improve the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601.
  • Fernandez-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N. y Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale [Validez y fiabilidad de la version española modificada de la Trait MetaMood Scale]. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 751-755.
  • Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 214-219.
  • Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 845-857.
  • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hall, J. A. (1998). How big are nonverbal sex differences? The case of smiling and sensitivity to non-verbal cues. En Canary, D.J. y Dindia, K. (Eds), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 155-177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hall, J. A. (2001). The PONS test and the psychometric approach to measuring interpersonal sensitivity. En J. A. Hall y F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 143-160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hall, J. A. , Bernieri, F. J., Carney, D. R. (2005). Nonverbal and Interpersonal Sensitivity. En Jinni, A. Harrigan, J. A., Rosenthal, R. y Scherer, K. R. (Eds.) The New Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research, pp. 267-269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hall, J.A. y Bernieri, F.J. (2001). Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hall, J.A. y Halberstadt, A. G. (1994). "Subordination" and sensitivity to nonverbal cues: A study of married working women. Sex Roles, 31, 149-165.
  • Hall, J. A., Andrzejewski, S. A. y Yopchick, J. E. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(3), 149-180.
  • Hall, J. A., Andrzejewski, S. A., Murphy, N. A., Mast, M. S. y Feinstein, B. A. (2008). Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1476-1489.
  • Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A. y Mast, M. S. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30(4), 141-155.
  • Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A. y Mast, M. S. (2007). Nonverbal self-accuracy in interpersonal interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1675-1685.
  • Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., Blanch, D. C. y Frankel, R. M. (2009). Nonverbal sensitivity in medical students: Implications for clinical interactions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(11), 1217-1222.
  • Hill, C. E., Siegelman, L., Gronsky, B. R., Sturniolo, F. y Fretz, B. R. (1981). Nonverbal communication and counseling outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(3), 203-212.
  • John, O. P. y Soto, C. J. (2007). The importance of being valid. Reliability and the process of construct validation. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley y R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 461-494). Nueva York, NY: Guilford.
  • Juslin, P. N. y Scherer, K. R. (2005). Vocal expression of affect. In J. A. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal, y K. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 65-135). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Knapp, M.L. y Hall, J.A. (2002). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Wadsworth: Thompson Learning, Inc.
  • Konold, T. R., Jamison, K. R., Stanton-Chapman, T. L. y Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2010). Relationships among informant based measures of social skills and student achievement: a longitudinal examination of differential effects by sex. Applied Developmental Science, 14(1), 18-34.
  • Lee, D. Y., Hallberg, E. T., Kocsis, M. y Haase, R. F. (1980). Decoding skills in nonverbal communication and perceived interviewer effectiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27(1), 89-92.
  • Martínez-Sánchez, F. (1996). Adaptación española de la escala de alexitimia de Toronto (TAS-20). Clínica y Salud, 7(1), 19-32.
  • Martínez-Sánchez, F., Blanco, M. L., Páez, D. y Costa, D. (en prensa). Beliefs about the effects of social sharing of emotion in alexithymia. Psicot-hema
  • Martínez-Sánchez, F., Zech, E. y Páez, D. (2004). Adaptación española del cuestionario de creencias sobre los efectos del compartimiento social de las emociones, BSEQ. Ansiedad y Estrés, 10(1), 63-74.
  • Mast, M. S., Jonas, K. y Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: the phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835-850.
  • Mayer, J. D. y Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17(4), 433-442.
  • Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R. y Sitaremos, G. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. Emotion, 3(1), 97-105.
  • Mill, A., Allik, J., Realo, A., Valk, R. (2009). Age-related differences in emotion recognition ability: a cross-sectional study. Emotion, 9(5), 619-630.
  • Miller, A. B. y Lenzenweger, M. F. (2012). Schizotypy, social cognition and interpersonal sensitivity. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, May 28,
  • Nowicki, S. y Duke, M. P. (1994). Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy scale. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18(1), 9-35.
  • Orbelo, D. M., Grim, M. A., Talbott, R. E. y Ross, E. D. (2005). Impaired comprehension of affective prosody in elderly subjects is not predicted by age-related hearing loss or age-related cognitive decline. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 18(1), 25-32.
  • Pérez, J. E. y Riggio, R. E. (2003). Nonverbal social skills and psychopathology. En P. Philippot, E. J. Coats y R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior in clinical settings (pp. 17-44). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Riggio, R. E. (1989). Manual for the Social Skills Inventory: Research edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Riggio, R. E. (2006). Nonverbal skills and abilities. En V. Manusov y M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 79-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Roberts, R. D., Schulze, R., O'Brien, K., MacCann, C., Reid, J. y Maul, A. (2006). Exploring the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) with established emotions measures. Emotion, 6(4), 663-669.
  • Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L. y Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS Test. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Ruffman, T., Henry, J. D., Livingstone, V. y Phillips, L. H. (2008). A meta- analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 863-881.
  • Russell, J. A. y Fernandez-Dols, J. M. (Eds.) (1997). The Psychology of Facial Expression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Salguero, J. M., Fernandez-Berrocal, P., Balluerka, N. y Aritzeta, A. (2010). Measuring perceived emotional intelligence in adolescent population: psychometric properties of the Trait Meta Mood Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(9), 1197-1210.
  • Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., y Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: exploring emotional intelligence using Trait Meta-Mood Scale. En J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, Disclosure, & Health (pp. 125-154). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  • Sawilowsky, S. y Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and type II error properties of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 353-360.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2007). Component models of emotion can inform the quest for emotional competence. En G. Matthews, M. Zeidner y R. D. Roberts (Eds.), The science of emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns (pp. 101-126). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1307-1351.
  • Scherer, K. R. y Bänziger, T. (2010). On the use of actor portrayals in research on emotional expression. En K. R. Scherer, T. Bänziger y E. B. Roesch, (Eds.), Blueprint for affective computing: A sourcebook (pp. 166-178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Scherer, K. R. y Scherer, U. (2011). Assessing the ability to recognize facial and vocal expressions of emotion: Construction and validation of the Emotion Recognition Index (ERI). Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(4), 305-326.
  • Scherer, K. R., Banse, R., Wallbott, H. G. y Goldbeck, T. (1991). Vocal cues in emotion encoding and decoding. Motivation and Emotion, 15(2), 123-148.
  • Simon, D., Craig, K. D., Gosselin, F., Belin, P. y Rainville, P. (2008). Recognition and discrimination of prototypical dynamic expressions of pain and emotions. Pain, 135(1-2), 55-64.
  • Sullivan, S. y Ruffman, T. (2004). Emotion recognition deficits in the elderly. International Journal of Neuroscience, 114(3), 403-432.
  • Sullivan, S., Ruffman, T. y Hutton, S. B. (2007). Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces. Journal of Gerontology, 62B(1), 53-60.
  • Suzuki, A., Hoshino, T., Shigemasu, K. y Kawamura, M. (2007). Decline or improvement? Age-related differences in facial expression recognition. Biological Psychology, 74(1), 75-84.
  • Tickle-Degnen, L. (1998). Working well with others: The prediction of students' clinical performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(2), 133-142.
  • Timmers, M., Fischer, A. y Manstead, A. (2003). Ability versus vulnerability: Beliefs about men's and women's emotional behaviour. Cognition & Emotion, 17(1), 41-63.
  • Wallbott, H. G. (1998). Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 879-896.