Revisiting Responsibility Attribution within Multilevel GovernmentsThe Role of Information

  1. Ana Herrero-Alcalde 1
  2. José Manuel Tránchez Martín 1
  3. María Eugenia Goenaga Ruiz de Zuazu 2
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

ISSN: 0210-1173

Año de publicación: 2018

Número: 226

Páginas: 37-58

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7866/HPE-RPE.18.3.2 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

Resumen

Recent research has shown that citizens living in decentralized countries struggle to identify which level of government is designing and implementing public policies, thus hindering the due accountability process of democracy. This paper contributes to the literature on the determinants of citizens´ responsibility attribution by analyzing the Spanish case. A novel methodological approach is used by separately analyzing those citizens who fail to identify the competent level of government and those who did not even give an answer. Besides, two novel hypotheses are tested regarding the process by which information is transmitted to and absorbed by citizens: the impact of regional media and the territorial group bias. After confirming that the methodological strategy is correct, we find strong evidence that the existence of regional media helps responsibility attribution, thus fostering accountability; while co-official languages, used as a proxy of a group bias, hamper the process by which citizens identify the competent level of government

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, C. (2000), "Economic voting and political context: a comparative perspective", Electoral Studies 19(2-3): 151-170
  • Anderson, C. (2006), "Economic voting and multi-level governance: an individual-level analysis", American Journal of Political Science, 50(2): 449-463
  • Arceneaux, K. (2006), "The federal face of voting: are elected officials held accountable for the functions relevant to their office?", Political Psychology, 27(5): 731-754
  • Ben-Porath, E. and Shaker, L. (2010), "New images, race, and attribution in the wake of hurricane Katrina", Journal of Communication, 60(3): 466-490
  • Brown, A. (2008), "Partisanship, blame, and divided federalism: how voters assess gubernatorial responsibility for the state economy", In: 8th Annual State Policy and Politics Conference, Philadelphia, USA, 30-31 May 2008
  • Brown, A. (2010), "Are governors responsible for the state economy? Partisanship, blame and divided federalism", The Journal of Politics, 72(3): 605-615
  • N. (2013), "Holding governments accountable: Individual heterogeneity in performance voting", European Journal of Political Research, 53(2): 345-362
  • Gómez, B and Wilson, J. (2007), "Help us, please! Attributions of governmental responsibility in the wake of hurricane Katrina", In: Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, USA, 4-6 January 2007
  • Herrero, A., Goenaga, M. and Ruiz-Huerta, J. (2015), "Finanzas autonómicas: visibilidad, transparencia y atribución de responsabilidades", Papeles de Economía Española, 143: 185-204
  • Hobolt, S. and Tilley, J. (2014a), "Who's in charge? How voters attribute responsibility in the European Union", Comparative Political Studies, 47(6): 795-819
  • Hobolt, S. and Tilley, J. (2014b) Blaming Europe. Responsibility Without Accountability In The European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Hobolt, S., Tilley, J. and Wittrock, J. 2013. Listening to the government: How information shapes responsibility attributions. Political Behavior 35(1): 153-174
  • Lago, I. and Cordero, S. (2016) "The bright side of the economic crisis: the attribution of political responsibilities in hard times", Canadian Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 151-170
  • Lago, I. and Lago, S. (2010), "Decentralization and electoral accountability", Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28: 318-334
  • Lago, S. and Lago, I. (2013), La atribución de responsabilidades políticas en Estados descentralizados. Cuadernos Económicos del ICE, 85: 44-63
  • León, S. (2010a), "Who is responsible for what? Clarity of responsibilities in multilevel states: The case of Spain", European Journal of Political Research, 50: 80-109
  • León, S. (2010b), "Leaking accountability on the way to federalism? The case of Spain", Working Papers, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Spain, n.120/2010
  • León, S. (2012), "How do citizens attribute responsibility in multilevel states? Learning, biases and asymmetric federalism. Evidence from Spain", Electoral Studies, 31: 120-130
  • León, S. (Coord) (2015), La Financiación Autonómica. Claves Para Comprender Un (Interminable) Debate. Madrid: Alianza
  • León, S. and Ferrín, M. (2007), "La atribución de responsabilidades sobre las políticas públicas en un sistema de gobierno multinivel", Administración & Ciudadanía, 2(1): 49-75
  • León, S. and Orriols, L. (2016), "Asymmetric federalism and economic voting", European Journal of Political Research, 55(4): 847-865
  • López, J. (2011), Beneficios y costes del Estado Autonómico. Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad, 1: 34-42
  • López, J. and Rodrigo, F. (2012), "¿Por qué los españoles son (moderadamente) autonomistas? Las ganancias regionales de eficiencia y la preferencia por la autonomía", Ekonomiaz, 81: 62-81
  • López, J. and Rodrigo, F. (2013), "Nueva evidencia sobre atribución de responsabilidades sobre los servicios regionales y preferencia por la descentralización", Working Papers, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Spain, n.3/2013
  • López, J. and Rodrigo, F. (2014), "Percepciones de los ciudadanos sobre las haciendas regionales: Quién es y quién debería ser responsable de los servicios e impuestos autonómicos", Revista de Economía Aplicada, 65: 1-28
  • López, J. and Rodrigo, F. (2015), "Attribution of regional responsibilities for public services and citizen support of decentralization: Evidence from Spain", Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 152: 65-86
  • Maestas, C., Atkenson, L., Croom, T. and Bryant, L. (2008), "Shifting the blame: Federalism, media and public assignment of blame following hurricane Katrina", Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 38(4): 609-632
  • Malhotra, N. and Kuo, A. (2008), "Attributing blame: The public's response to hurricane Katrina", The Journal of Politics, 70(1): 120-135
  • Musgrave, R. (1959), The Theory of Public Finance: a Study in Political Economy, New York: Mcgraw-Hill
  • Nadeu, R., Niemi, R. and Yoshinak, A. (2002), "A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context across time and nations", Electoral Studies, 21: 403-423
  • Oates, W. (1972), Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
  • Powell, G. and Whitten, G. (1993), "A cross national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context", American Journal of Political Science, 37(2): 391-414
  • Rudolph, T. (2003a), "Who's responsible for the economy? The formation and consequences of responsibility attributions", American Journal of Political Science, 47(4): 698-713
  • Rudolph, T. (2003b), "Institutional context and the assignment of political responsibility", The Journal of Politics, 65(1): 190-215
  • Schneider, S. (2008), "Who's to blame? (Mis) perceptions of the intergovernmental response to disasters", Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 38(4): 715-738
  • Tilley, J. and Hobolt, S. (2011), "Is the government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility", The Journal of Politics, 73(2): 1-15
  • Whitten, G. and Palmer, H. (1999), "Cross-national analyses of economic voting", Electoral Studies, 18: 49-67
  • Wlezien, C. and Soroka, S. (2011), "Federalism and public responsiveness to policy", Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(1): 31-52