La responsabilidad del acreedor en el Reglamento 655/2014, sobre la Orden Europea de retención de cuentas

  1. Villamarín López, María Luisa 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

ISSN: 1989-4570

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 12

Issue: 2

Pages: 1470-1482

Type: Article

DOI: 10.20318/CDT.2020.5679 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Abstract

Regulation 655/2014, which establishes the European Account Preservation Order, has provided a series of mechanisms to balance the privileged position in which it places cross-border cre­ditors when they request such measure inaudita parte debitoris. In this article, we address critically the two fundamental instruments that are envisaged for this purpose: first, the provision of security, which, as a general rule, is configured as one of the most important requirements of these measures (Art. 12); second, the liability regime due to the creditor for the damages derived from the adoption of the Euro­pean order (Art. 13), which has been foreseen as a minimum standard and, therefore, has left almost all aspects of this responsibility for the application of national laws.

Bibliographic References

  • Domej, T., “Die geplante Verordnung über die Europäische vorläufige Kontenpfändung”, ZEuP, 2013, p. 501.
  • Villamarín López, M.L., en Díez - Picazo Giménez, I., y Vegas Torres, J. (coord.), Derecho, Justicia, Universidad (Liber Amicorum de Andrés de la Oliva Santos), Ed. CERA, 2016, p. 3237.
  • Hilbig-Lugani, K., en Münchener Kommentar, Ed. Beck, 2017, Art. 12.
  • Schlosser, P. y Hess, B., en EU Zivilprozessrecht, Ed. Beck, 2015, p. 448.
  • Cuniberti, G. y Migliorini, S., The European Account Preservation Order Regulation, Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2018, p. 163.
  • Sandrini, L., “La procedura “per l'adozione” dell'ordinanza europea di sequestro conservativo dei conti bancari”, en Il sequestro conservativo di conti bancari, Ed. Giuffrè, Milán, 2015, en p. 69
  • Rauscher, T. y Wiedemann, en Europäisches Zivilprozess und Kollisionsrecht, Art. 13, #10 y HilbigLugani, K., en Münchener Kommentar, Ed. Beck, 2017, Art. 13, #4.
  • Trenker, M., en Schumacher, H., Köllensperger, B. y Trenker, M., Kommentar zur EUKontenpfändungsverordnung, Ed. Manz, Viena, 2017, p. 142
  • Bernardo San José, A., La responsabilidad derivada de la adopción de medidas cautelares en el proceso civil, Ed. Tirant lo Blanch, 2018, p. 81.
  • Senés Motilla, C., La orden europea de retención de cuentas, Ed. Aranzadi, 2015.
  • Antón Juarez, I., Litigación Internacional en la Unión Europea III. La orden europea de retención de cuentas, Ed. Aranzadi, 2018.
  • Domej, T., “Europäisches vorläufige Kontenpfändung: der erste Schritt einer langen Reise”, GPR, 2017.