Evolution of the big deals use in the public universities of the Castile and Leon region, Spain

  1. Andrés Fernández-Ramos 1
  2. Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo 1
  3. María-Luisa Alvite-Díez 1
  4. Lourdes Santos-De-Paz 1
  5. María-Antonia Morán-Suárez 1
  6. Josefa Gallego-Lorenzo 1
  7. Isabel Olea 1
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710 1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2019

Título del ejemplar: Estructuras de poder en Comunicación / Power structures in Communication

Volumen: 28

Número: 6

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2019.NOV.19 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openBULERIA editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Se estudia la evolución del uso de revistas científicas electrónicas en el período 2007-2018 realizado por las comunidades académicas de las universidades públicas de Castilla y León adscritas al consorcio Bucle. Se analizan las descargas de artículos distribuidos por cuatro proveedores de amplio espectro: Emerald, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink y Wiley. Inesperadamente, dadas las nuevas vías de acceso a los contenidos, este análisis muestra que en las universidades públicas de Castilla y León se ha incrementado el número de descargas. Sin embargo se ha constatado que pese al crecimiento, unas pocas revistas aglutinan la mayor parte de las descargas y que un elevado número de títulos no se utiliza. Se verifica que las universidades con más plantilla y mayor diversidad de áreas de conocimiento utilizan un abanico de títulos más amplio y obtienen así un mayor rendimiento de las contrataciones. Todo lo anterior nos lleva a cuestionar el sistema de contratación de paquetes cerrados y multidisciplinares de centenares de revistas y otros recursos o big deals. En un momento de cambio impulsado por el Plan S, consideramos más necesario que nunca conocer la situación de partida en la provisión de contenidos de publicaciones científicas seriadas que ayude a establecer de manera fundamentada las estrategias adecuadas y más eficientes de acceso a la información científica.

Información de financiación

This research has been funded by the Programa Estatal de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación Orientada a los Retos de la Sociedad 2017 (the State Research, Development and Innovation Program for the Challenges of the Society 2017), convened by the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness) and the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Spanish State Research Agency) (CSO2017-87956-R) and by the grant program aimed at supporting the accredited research groups of public universities of Castile and Leon started in 2018, convened by the Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León (Ministry of Education of the Castile and Leon regional government) (LE028G18).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, Chris (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion Books. ISBN: 978 1 40130237 http://dl.motamem.org/long_tail_chris_anderson_motamem_org.pdf
  • Armstrong, Kimberly L.; Teper, Thomas H. (2017). “Library consortia and the CIC: Leveraging scale for collaborative success”. Serials review, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1284493
  • Arthur, Michael A. (2018). “Managing a comprehensive cost-per-use project in a large academic library”. Serials review, v. 44, n. 4, pp. 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2018.1558936
  • Belter, Cristopher W.; Kaske, Neal K. (2016). “Using bibliometrics to demonstrate the value of library journal collections”. College and research libraries, v. 77, n. 4, pp. 410-422. https://doi.org/10.5860/CRL.77.4.410
  • Bergstrom, Theodore C.; Courant, Paul N.; McAfee, Preston R.; Williams, Michael A. (2014). “Evaluating big deal journal bundles”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 111, n. 26, pp. 9425-9430. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403006111
  • Blecic, Deborah D.; Wiberley, Stephen E.; Fiscella, Joan B.; Bahnmaier-Blaszczak, Sara; Lowery, Rebeca (2013). “Deal or no deal? Evaluating big deals and their journals”. College & research libraries, v. 74, n. 2, pp. 178-193. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-300
  • Boots, Angela; Chester, Julia; Shaw, Emma; Wilson, Chris (2007). “E-journal usage statistics in action: A case study from cancer research UK”. In: Fowler, David C. (ed.). Usage statistics of e-serials. New York: Haworth Information Press, pp. 183-198. ISBN: 978 0 789029881
  • Borrego, Ángel; Anglada, Lluís (2016). “Faculty information behaviour in the electronic environment”. New library world, v. 117, n. 3/4, pp. 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0089
  • Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Bador, Pascal; Lafouge, Thierry; Prost, Hélène (2016). “Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: A bibliometric analysis”. Scientometrics, v. 106, n. 1, pp. 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1779-z
  • Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Schöpfel, Joachim (2008). “On the usage of e-journals in French universities”. Serials, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1629/21121
  • Britten, William A. (1990). “A use statistic for collection management: The 80/20 rule revisited”. Library acquisitions: Practice and theory, v. 14, n. 2, pp. 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-6408(90)90061-X
  • Bucknall, Tim; Bernhardt, Beth; Johnson, Amanda (2014). “Using cost per use to assess big deals”. Serials review, v. 40, n. 3, pp. 194-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2014.949398
  • Chew, Katherine; Schoenborn, Mary; Stemper, James; Lilyard, Caroline (2016). “E-journal metrics for collection management: Exploring disciplinary usage differences in Scopus and Web of Science”. Evidence based library and information practice, v. 11, n. 2, pp. 97-120. https://doi.org/10.18438/B85P87
  • Ciber (2009). E-Journals: their use, value and impact. Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research. London: City University. http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/E-journals-report.pdf
  • Coughlin, Daniel M.; Campbell, Mark C.; Jansen, Bernard J. (2016). “A web analytics approach for appraising electronic resources in academic libraries”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 3, pp. 518534. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23407
  • Dempsey, Lorcan (2006). “Libraries and the long tail. Some thoughts about libraries in a network age”. D-lib magazine, v. 12, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.1045/april2006-dempsey
  • Dempsey, Lorcan; Malpas, Constance; Lavoie, Brian (2014). “Collection directions: The evolution of library collections and collecting”. Portal: Libraries and the academy, v. 14, n. 3, pp. 393-423. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0013
  • Duan, Yufeng; Xiong, Zequan (2017). “Download patterns of journal papers and their influencing factors”. Scientometrics, v. 112, n. 3, pp. 1761-1775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2456-1
  • Emrani, Ebrahim; Moradi-Salari, Amin; Jamali, Hamid R. (2010). “Usage data, e-journal selection, and negotiations: An Iranian consortium experience”. Serials review, v. 36, n. 2, pp. 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2010.10765289
  • Frazier, Kenneth (2005). “What’s the big deal?”. The serials librarian, v. 48, n. 1-2, pp. 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v48n01_06
  • González-Solar, Llarina; Fernández-Marcial, Viviana (2019). “Sci-Hub, a challenge for academic and research libraries”. El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 1, e280112. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.12
  • Gorraiz, Juan; Gumpenberger, Christian; Schlögl, Christian (2014). “Usage versus citation behaviours in four subject areas”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1077-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1271-1
  • Himmelstein, Daniel S.; Rodríguez-Romero, Ariel; Levernier, Jacob G.; Munro, Thomas-Anthony; McLaughlin, StephenReid; Tzovaras, Bastian-Greshake; Greene, Casey S. (2018). “Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature”. eLife, v. 1, n. 7, pii: e32822. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32822
  • Icolc (2010). Statement on the global economic crisis and its impact on consortial licenses. International Coalition of Library Consortia. http://icolc.net/statement/revised-statement-global-economic-crisis-and-its-impact-consortial-licenses
  • Jamali, Hamid R.; Nabavi, Majid (2015). “Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields”. Scientometrics, v. 105, n. 3, pp. 1635-1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2
  • Jung, Youngim; Kim, Jayhoon; So, Minho; Kim, Hwanmin (2015). “Statistical relationships between journal use and research output at academic institutions in South Korea”. Scientometrics, v. 103, n. 3, pp. 751-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1563-0
  • Kostagiolas, Petros A.; Korfiatis, Nikolaos; Poulos, Marios (2012). “A long-tail inspired measure to assess resource use in information services”. Library & information science research, v. 34, n. 4, pp. 317-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2012.05.002
  • Kwon, Diana (2018). “French universities cancel subscriptions to Springer journals”. The scientist, March 31. https://www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/french-universities-cancel-subscriptions-to-springer-journals-29882
  • Martin, Virginia; Gray, Teddy; Kilb, Megan; Minchew, Tessa (2016). “Analyzing consortial ‘big deals’ via a cost-per-cited-reference (CPCR) metric”. Serials review, v. 42, n. 4, pp. 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2016.1248218
  • McDonald, John D. (2007). “Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 58, n. 1, pp. 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20420
  • Meier, Andreas; Tunger, Dirk (2018). “Survey on opinions and usage patterns for the ResearchGate platform”. Plos one, v. 13, n. 10, e0204945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204945
  • Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Herman, Eti; Świgoń, Marzena (2017). “Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1087
  • Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Herman, Eti; Clark, David; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Świgoń, Marzena (2019). “Sci-Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front”. Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 2, pp. 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1206
  • Nisonger, Thomas E. (2008). “The 80/20 rule and core journals”. Serials librarian, v. 55, n. 1-2, pp. 62-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801970774
  • Rafi, Muhammad; JianMing, Zheng; Ahmad, Khurshid (2019). “Evaluating the impact of digital library database resources on the productivity of academic research”. Information discovery and delivery, v. 47, n. 1, pp. 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2018-0025
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa (2004). ”Análisis de los contenidos distribuidos por proveedores de publicaciones electrónicas”. El profesional de la información, v. 13, n. 6, pp. 441-449. http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2004/noviembre/4.pdf
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa (2005). “Survey of the providers of electronic publications holding contracts with Spanish university libraries”. D-lib magazine, v. 11, n. 4, pp. 20-39. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/alvite/04alvite.html
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa (2006a). “The use of electronic journals in academic libraries in Castilla y León”. In: Brophy, Peter; Craven, Jenny; Markland, Margaret (eds.). Libraries without walls 6: Evaluating the distributed delivery of library services. London: Facet Publishing, pp. 125-137. ISBN: 978 1856045766
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa (2006b) “Uso de las revistas-e suministradas por Emerald en bibliotecas universitarias españolas (2002-2005)”. El profesional de la información, v. 15, n. 6, pp. 464-472. http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2006/noviembre/08.pdf
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa (2011). “An analysis of the use of electronic journals in a Spanish academic context: Developments and profitability”. Serials review, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2011.06.003
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa (2013). “Impact of the consumption of electronic contents on research productivity in the universities of Castile and Leon”. Library collections, acquisitions, and technical services, v. 37, n. 3-4, pp. 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LCATS.2013.09.007
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa; Barrionuevo-Almuzara, Leticia (2012). “Trends and models in the consumption of electronic contents. An analysis of the journals most widely used in Spanish universities”. Journal of academic librarianship, v. 38, n. 2, pp. 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.11.007
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa; Barrionuevo-Almuzara, Leticia; Morán-Suárez, María-Antonia (2008). “Patterns of use of electronic journals in Spanish university libraries”. Serials review, v. 34, n. 2, pp. 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2008.01.002
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa; Morán-Suárez, María-Antonia; Marraud, Gerardo (2012). “Impacto de la contratación de colecciones de revistas electrónicas en la productividad de la Universidad de Vigo”. El profesional de la información, v. 21, n. 6, pp. 585-594. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.nov.05
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Pacios, Ana-Reyes; Vianello-Osti, Marina; Moro-Cavero, Manuela; De-la-Mano-González, Marta (2015). “Digital transition of teaching learning resources at Spanish universities”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 6, pp. 737-748. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.nov.05
  • Schonfeld, Roger C. (2019). “Is the value of the big deal in decline?”. The scholarly kitchen, March 7. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/03/07/value-big-deal-leakage
  • Schöpfel, Joachim; Leduc, Claire (2012). “Big deal and long tail: e-journal usage and subscriptions”. Library review, v. 61, n. 7, pp. 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531211288245
  • Shu, Fei; Mongeon, Philippe; Haustein, Stefanie; Siler, Kyle; Alperin, Juan-Pablo; Larivière, Vincent (2018). “Is it such a big deal? On the cost of journal use in the digital era”. College & research libraries, v. 79, n. 6, pp. 785-798. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.6.785
  • Singson, Mangkholien; Hangsing, Paokholun (2015). “Implication of 80/20 rule in electronic journal usage of UGC-Infonet Consortia”. The journal of academic librarianship, v. 41, n. 2, pp. 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.12.002
  • Srivastava, Bhawana; Kumar, Sanjeev (2018). “Usage and impact of Science Direct material science package in a material science library”. Desidoc. Journal of library & information technology, v. 38, n. 1, pp. 21-26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322469533_Usage_and_Impact_of_Science_Direct_Material_Science_ Package_in_a_Material_Science_Library https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.1.12124
  • Stemper, James A.; Jaguszewski, Janice M. (2003). “Usage statistics for electronic journals”. Collection management, v. 28, n. 4, pp. 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v28n04_02
  • Tetteh, Evelin O. Apronti (2018). “Usage evaluation of electronic resources in academic and research libraries in Ghana”. Global knowledge, memory and communication, v. 67, n. 4/5, pp. 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2017-0097
  • Tripathi, Manorama; Kumar, Sunil (2014). “Use of online resources at Jawaharlal Nehru University: a quantitative study”. Program, v. 48, n. 3, pp. 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-11-2012-0059
  • Trueswell, Richard L. (1969). “Some behavioral patterns of library users: The 80/20 rule”. Wilson library bulletin, v. 43, n. 5, pp. 458-461. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ005380
  • University of California (2019). “Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California”. Office of scholarly communication. May. https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/open-access-at-uc/publisher-negotiations/negotiating-with-scholarly-journalpublishers-a-toolkit
  • Urbano, Cristóbal; Anglada, Lluís M.; Borrego, Ángel; Cantos, Carme; Cosculluela, Antonio; Comellas, Núria (2004). “The use of consortially purchased electronic journals by the CBUC (2000-2003)”. D-lib magazine, v. 10, n. 6. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/anglada/06anglada.html
  • Wang, Xianwen; Fang, Zhichao; Sun, Xiaoling (2016). “Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science: a study on Web of Science usage count”. Scientometrics, v. 109, n. 2, pp. 917-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2093-0
  • Williams, Virginia-Kay (2010). “Issues in determining cost for cost per use calculations”. Procedings of the Charleston Library Conference. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314838
  • Zhu, Qiandong; Xiang, Huimin (2016). “Differences of Pareto principle performance in e-resource download distribution”. The electronic library, v. 34, n. 5, pp. 846-855. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2015-0068