Convenciones sociales y sujetos silenciados. Una crítica a la situación ideal de habla en relación con la obra de Virginia Woolf
ISSN: 1579-7902
Argitalpen urtea: 2013
Zenbakia: 12
Orrialdeak: 43-60
Mota: Artikulua
Beste argitalpen batzuk: Clepsydra: Revista de Estudios de Género y Teoría Feminista
Laburpena
The aim of this paper is to analyse a different version of the human communicative process, which is presented as a critique to Jürgen Harbermas’s ideal discourse theory. For this purpose, I will be referring to three critical objections to Habermas’s communicative action theory: the first one questions the implicit and universal consideration of the communicative structure; the second one objects to the formal and abstract subject that this author proposes; and the last one criticises the aproblematic conception of Habermas’s social normativity. To conclude, the paper also looks into Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse, which problematises Habermas’s ideal speech situation.
Erreferentzia bibliografikoak
- J. Habermas Acción comunicativa y razón sin trascendencia. Barcelona, Paidós, 2002, p. 17. 2
- J. Habermas Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Volumen 1. Madrid, Taurus, 1999, p. 144.
- J. Habermas Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Complementos y estudios previos Madrid, Cátedra, 1989
- N. Pleasants, Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory. Londres, Routledge, 1999, p. 160.
- L. Kohlberg, «From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development», en T. Mischel (ed.), Cognitive Development and Epistemology, Nueva York, Academic Press, 1971, p. 232.
- J. Habermas, Conciencia moral y acción comunicativa. Madrid, Trotta, 2008, p. 138.
- T. McCarthy, «Rationality and relativism», en J. Thompson y D. Held (eds.), Habermas. Critical Debates, Cambridge. MIT Press, 1982, pp. 57-78.
- J. Dean, «Discourse in different voices», en J. Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject Discourse, Nueva York, Routledge 1995, pp. 205-230, p. 205.