¿Cómo interactúan la información del léxico y la configuración sintáctica?divergencias entre el neoconstruccionismo y el lexicalismo

Bibliographic References

• ACQUAVIVA, P. (2009): «Roots and lexicality in distributed morphology», en Galani, A., Redinger, D. y Yeo, N. (eds.), York-Essex morphology meeting 2, York, University of York, pp. 1-21.
• ACKEMA, P. y NEELEMAN, A. (2004): Beyond morphology, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• — (2007): «Morphology ≠ Syntax», en Ramchand, G. y Reiss, C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 324-352.
• ALEXIADOU, A. (2001): Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity, Ámsterdam, John Benjamins.
• — (2010): «Distributed Morphology: selected topics in mixed category formation», conferencia impartida en Current issues in formal linguistics, organizado por CCHS (CSIC), Madrid.
• —; BORER, H. y SCHÄFER, F. (2014): The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• ARAD, M. (1998): VP-Structure and the syntax-lexicon interface, Tesis Doctoral, Londres, UCL.
• — (1999): «On the nature of v: evidence from object experiencer verbs», GLOW Colloquium 22, Berlín.
• — (2003): «Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: the case of Hebrew denominal verbs», Natural Language and Linguistic theory 21.4, pp. 737-378.
• ARONOFF, M. (1976): Word formation in generative grammar, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• BACH, E. (1981): «On time, tense, and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics», Radical pragmatics, Nueva York, Academic Press, pp. 62-81.
• — (1986): «The algebra of events», Linguistics and Philosophy 9, pp. 5-16.
• BAKER, M. (1988): Incorporation, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• BONET, E. (1991): Morphology after syntax, Tesis doctoral, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT.
• BOOIJ, G. (1977): Dutch morphology. A study of word formation in Generative Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.
• BORER, H. (2003): «Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanation: Syntactic projection and the lexicon», en Moor, J. y Polinsky, M. (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory, Stanford, CSLI, pp. 31-67.
• — (2005a): Structuring sense, vol. I: In name only, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• — (2005b): Structuring sense, vol. II: The normal course of events, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• — (2009): «Roots and categories», ejemplario presentado en el Coloquio de gramática generativa, Universidad del País Vasco.
• — (2012): «In the event of a nominal», en Everaert, M., Marelj, M. y Siloni, T. (eds.), The theta system: argument structure in the interface, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 103-150.
• — (2013): Structuring sense, vol. III: Taking form, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• CAHA, P. (2009): The nanosyntax of case, Tesis Doctoral, University of Tromsø.
• CANO, Mª. A. (2013): Las derivaciones en –nte y –dor: Estructura argumental y complejidad sintáctica en una morfología neoconstruccionista, Tesis doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
• CHOMSKY, N. (1965): Aspects of the theory of syntax, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• — (1970): «Remarks on nominalization», en Jacobs, R. y Rosenbaum, P. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, Washington, Georgetown University Press, pp. 232-286.
• — (1981): Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures, Dordrecht-Holland, Foris.
• — (1995): The minimalist program, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• DE BELDER, M. y VAN CRAENENBROECK, J. (2011): «How to merge a root», ms.
• DI SCIULLO, A. M.ª (1997): «Selection and derivational affixes», en Dressler, W., Prinzhorn, M. y Rennison, J. (eds.), Advances in morphology, Berlín/Nueva York, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 79-96.
• — y WILLIAMS, E. (1987): On the definition of word, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• DOWTY, D. (1979): Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in montague’s PTQ, Dordrecht, Reidel.
• — (1991): «Thematic proto-roles and argument selection», Language 67, pp. 574-619.
• EMBICK, D. (2000): «Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect», Linguistic Inquiry 31.2, pp. 185-230.
• — y NOYER, R. (2001): «Movement operations after syntax», Linguistic Inquiry 32, pp. 555-595.
• — (2007): «Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface», en Ramchand, G. y Reiss, C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 289-324.
• FÁBREGAS, A. (2005): La definición de la categoría gramatical en una morfología orientada sintácticamente: nombres y adjetivos, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
• — (2007): «An Exhaustive lexicalisation account of directional complements», en Svenonius, P., Ramchand, G., Starke, M. y Tarald Taraldsen, K. (eds.), Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers on Language & Linguistics 34.2, pp. 165-199.
• — (2009): «An argument for phrasal spell-out: Indefinites and interrogatives in Spanish», en Svenonius, P., Ramchand, G., Starke, M. y Tarald Taraldsen, K. (eds.), Nordlyd: Special issue on nanosyntax 36.1, pp. 129-168.
• GRIMSHAW, J. (1990): Argument structure, linguistic inquiry monographs 18, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• HALE, K. y KEYSER, J. (1993): «On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations», en Hale, K. y Keyser, J. (eds.), The view form building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, pp. 53-109.
• HALLE, M. (1973): «Prolegomena to a theory of word formation», Linguistic Inquiry 4.1, pp. 3-16.
• — (1997): «Distributed morphology: impoverishment and fission», MITWPL 30: Papers at the Interface, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, pp. 425-449.
• HALLE, M. y MARANTZ, A. (1993): «Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection», en Hale, K. y Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, pp. 111-176.
• — (1994): «Some key features of distributed morphology», en Carnie, A. y Harley, H. (eds.), Papers on phonology and morphology, MITWPL 21, pp. 275-288.
• HARLEY, H. (1995): Subjects, events and licensing, Tesis Doctoral, MIT.
• — (2005): «How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English», en Erteschik-Shir, N. y Rapoport, T. (eds.), The syntax of aspect, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 42-64.
• — (2009): «Compounding in distributed morphology», en Lieber, R. y S ˇtekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford handbook of compounding, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 129-144.
• HARLEY, H. y NOYER, R. (1998): «Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon: Nominalizations, vocabulary items and the encyclopaedia», en Harley, H. (ed.), MITWPL 32: Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument and aspect, Cambridge (Mass.), pp. 119-138.
• — (1999): «Distributed morphology», Glot International 4.4, pp. 3-9.
• JACKENDOFF, R. (1990): Semantic structures, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• KRATZER, A. (1996): «Severing the external argument from the verb», en Rooryck, J. y Zaring, L. (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 109-137.
• KRIFKA, M. (1998): «The origins of telicity», en Rothstein, S. (ed.), Events and grammar, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 197-235.
• LEVIN, B. (1993): English verb classes and alternations: A preliminaryinvestigation, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• LEVIN, B. y RAPPAPORT HOVAV, M. (1995): Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexical semantics interface, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• LIEBER, R. (1980): On the organization of the lexicon, Tesis Doctoral, University of New Hampshire.
• MARANTZ, A. (1995a): A late note on late insertion, ms., Cambridge (Mass.), MIT.
• — (1995b): Cat is a phrasal idiom: consequences of late insertion in DM, ms., Cambridge (Mass.), MIT.
• — (1997): «No Escape from syntax. Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon», UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 4, pp. 201-225.
• — (2000): «Roots: the universality of root and pattern morphology», artículo presentado en la Universidad de París VII.
• ─ (2001): Words, ms., Cambridge (Mass.), MIT.
• — (2003): Subjects and objects, ms., MIT.
• MENDIKOETXEA, A. (2007): «En busca de los primitivos léxicos y su realización sintáctica: del léxico a la sintaxis y viceversa», en Cabré, T. (ed.), Lingüística teòrica: Anàlisi i perspectives, Vol. II, Bellaterra, Publicacions de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, pp. 55-102.
• MORIMOTO, Y. (1998): El aspecto léxico: delimitación, Madrid, Arco/Libros.
• MOURELATOS, P. D. (1978): «Events, processes and states», Linguistic and Philosophy 2, pp. 415-434.
• NOYER, R. (1997): Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure, Nueva York, Garland Publishing.
• PANTCHEVA, M. (2011): Decomposing path. The nanosyntax of directional expressions, Tesis Doctoral, University of Tromsø.
• PUSTEJOVSKY, J. (1995): Zero syntax, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• RAMCHAND, G. (2008): Verb meaning and the lexicon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• SCALISE, S. (1983): Generative morphology, Dordrecht, Foris Publications.
• STARKE, M. (2001): Move reduces to merge: A theory of locality, Tesis Doctoral, University of Geneva.
• — (2009): «Nanosyntax: a short primer to a new approach to language», en Svenonius, P., Ramchand, G., Starke, M. y Tarald Taraldsen, K. (eds.), Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers on Language & Linguistics 36.1, pp. 1-6.
• — (2011): «Towards elegant parameters: variation reduces to the size of lexically storedtrees», transcripción de la charla en Barcelona workshop on linguistic variation in the minimalist framework.
• SVENONIUS, P. (2010): «Spatial P in English», en Cinque, G. y Rizzi, L. (eds.), The cartography of syntactic structure, vol. 6, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 127-160.
• TENNY, C. (1994): Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface, Dordrecht, Kluwer.
• VAN HOUT, A. (2000): «Event semantics and the lexicon-syntax interface», en Tenny, C. y Pustejovsky, J. (eds.), Events as grammatical objects, Stanford, CSLI, pp. 239-282.
• VAN HOUT, A. y ROEPER, T. (1998): «Events and aspectual structure in derivational morphology», MITWPL 32: Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, pp. 175-220.
• VARELA, S. (1990): Fundamentos de morfología, Madrid, Síntesis.
• VENDLER, Z. (1967): Linguistics in philosophy, Ithaca (NY), Cornell University Press.
• VERKUYL, H. J. (1989): «Aspectual classes and aspectual composition», Linguistics and Philosophy 12, pp. 39-94.
• — (1993): A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• WILLIAMS, E. (1981): «Argument structure and morphology», The Linguistic Review 1, pp. 81-114.
• — (2007): «Dumping Lexicalism», en Ramchand, G. y Reiss, C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 353-382.