Afectación psicológica y calidad de vida del paciente ostomizado temporal y definitivo. Estudio Stoma Feeling

  1. Mª Elena García Manzanares
  2. Montesinos Gálvez, Ana Carmen
  3. Quintana Jiménez, Paloma de la
  4. Vaquer Casas, Glòria
Revista:
Metas de enfermería

ISSN: 1138-7262

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 18

Número: 10

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Metas de enfermería

Resumen

Objective: to assess the psychological or emotional impact of stoma creation on patients, and if there are differences in the psychological impact and quality of life between persons with a temporary stoma and those with a definitive stoma. Method: an observational, controlled and multicentre study. The population included in this study were persons who had recently undergone surgery to create an ileostomy or colostomy. The study consisted of an inclusion visit immediately after surgery and a final visit three months after inclusion. It was conducted in public and private health centres in Spain, under regular care conditions, and according to clinical practice. The tools used for the analysis of the study variables were the Quality of Life Questionnaire (Stoma-QoL) and the NANDA, NIC and NOC taxonomies. Results: out of the 814 patients in the study, 61.5% were male, with a mean 62.5 years of age. Regarding the type of ostomy, 57% were colostomies vs. 43% of ileostomies. In terms of the comparative analysis between patients with temporary and definitive ostomy, the results regarding the number of indicators of NOC outcomes selected were a mean 7.8 in temporary ostomy and 7.2 in definitive ostomy, but these were not statistically significant (p= 0.1809). Regarding the assessment of the indicators selected within each suggested NOC, outcomes were very similar, and no significant differences were found in any parameter between patients with temporary or definitive ostomy. Discussion and conclusions: the assessment of the outcomes reveals that there are no significant differences in the outcomes for NOC indicators between patients with a temporary or definitive stoma three months after the ostomy procedure. Regarding the assessment of quality of life through the validated Stoma QoL questionnaire, a higher score has been recorded in patients with definitive ostomy, but this difference has not been statistically significant.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 01. Molina García AM, Guisado Carmona I, Valenciano Melero A. Atención integral al paciente ostomizado. Madrid: Coloplast Productos Médicos S.A.; 1992.
  • 02. Barbado San Martín E, Blanco Domínguez C, Blasco Belda P, Centellas Morral M, Fernández Rodríguez I, Gómez Mejías V, et al. Guía de cuidados de enfermería en pacientes ostomizados. Madrid: Coloplast Productos Médicos S.A.; 2001.
  • 03. IMS Healt Intelligence applied. Informes de mercado de la ostomía en España del año 2014. www.imshealth.com 04. Karadag A, Mentes BB, Uner A, Irkörücü O, Ayaz S, Ozkan S. Impact of stomatherapy on quality of life in patients with permanent colostomies or ileostomies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003 May; 18(3):234-8.
  • 05. Lyon CC, Smith AJ, Griffiths CE, Beck MH. The spectrum of skin disorders in abdominal stoma patients. Br J Dermatol 2000 Dec; 143(6):1248-60.
  • 06. Burch J. The management and care of people with stoma complications. Br J Nurs. 2004 Mar 25-Apr 7; 13(6):307-8, 310, 312, 314-8.
  • 07. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG. Quality of life with a temporary stoma: Ileostomy vs. colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000 May; 43(5):650-5.
  • 08. Campillo Martínez J. Estudio “Stoma Life”. Calidad de vida en los pacientes ostomizados un año después de la cirugía. Metas Enferm 2015 oct; 18(8):25-31.
  • 09. Prieto L, Thorsen H, Juul K. Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005; [citado 12 nov 2015]; 3: 62. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274339/?report=classic
  • 10. NANDA International. Nursing Diagnosis. Definition and classification 2015-2017. Tenth Edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2015.
  • 11. Bulechek GM, Johnson M, Maas ML, McCloskey J. Interrelaciones NANDA, NOC y NIC. 2ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier España; 2007.
  • 12. Moorhead S, Johnson M. Clasificación de Resultados de Enfermería (NOC). 4ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier España; 2009.
  • 13. McCloskey J, Bulechek GM. Clasificación de Intervenciones de Enfermería (NIC). 4ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier España; 2007.
  • 14. Burch J. Psychological problems and stomas: a rough guide for community nurses. BrJ Community Nurs 2005; 10(5): 224-7.
  • 15. Voergaard LL, Vendelbo G, Carlsen B, Jacobsen L, Nissen B, Mortensen J, et al. Ostomy bag management: comparative study of a new one-piece closed bag. Br J Nurs 2007 Jan 25-Feb 7; 16(2):95-6, 98-101.
  • 16. Lancharro M, Cano I, Bru E, Navalón C, Giménez M, Aznar S, et al. Poster-M & Q Study: Baseline demographics of the influence of marking the stoma on quality of life and the peristomal skin condition. 11th Biennial Congress of European Council of Enterostomal Therapists (ECET). Bologna, June 12th to 15th, 2011.
  • 17. Fernández A, Poca T, Rodríguez C, Quinteiro C, Mateos L, Rodríguez MJ, et al. M & Q study: marking the stoma and its influence on the peristomal skin condition and quality of life. 11th Biennial Congress of European Council of Enterostomal Therapists (ECET). Bologna, June 12th to 15th, 2011.
  • 18. García L, González M, Pérez C, Jonte JC, García V, Iborra L, et al. Impacto del cuidado experto de enfermera en el estado de la piel periestomal. 11th Biennial Congress of European Council of Enterostomal Therapists (ECET). Bologna, June 12th to 15th, 2011.
  • 19. Bona M, Pérez M, Serinanell MD, Serinanell H, Vivancos H, Silva O, et al. Impacto del cuidado experto de Enfermería sobre el bienestar del paciente de ostomía. 11th Biennial Congress of European Council of Enterostomal Therapists (ECET). Bologna, June 12th to 15th, 2011.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet