La percepción de la cualidad de voz y los estereotipos vocales

  1. Marianela Fernández Trinidad 1
  1. 1 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
    info

    Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02gfc7t72

Journal:
Revista Española de Lingüística
  1. Gil Fernández, Juana (ed. lit.)
  2. San Segundo, Eugenia (ed. lit.)

ISSN: 2254-8769

Year of publication: 2015

Issue Title: Percepción del habla

Volume: 45

Fascicle: 1

Pages: 45-72

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista Española de Lingüística

Abstract

An experimental study was carried out to explore the sound symbolic associations that voice quality conveys. In this case, voice quality was modified by changing the global F0 and the phonation type (breathy or pressed voice). A forced choice answer perception test was chosen to verify what associations were produced by these variations. In order to understand whether the participants’ answers were influenced by different voice qualities both quantitative and qualitative analyses were undertaken. Results show that the linkage between meanings and voices was very similar for all the judges. In the same way, it was proved that certain voice qualities led systematically to the same patterns of association. Associations depend on two different aspects; on the one hand, the tone and the phonation type, and on the other hand, previously fixed linguistic and cultural associations. In all the cases, depending on situational, linguistic or extralinguistic contexts, common factors are found to underpin all the qualifying adjectives used by the judges to define the voices

Bibliographic References

  • Bele, I.V. (2005): «Reliability in perceptual analisis of voice quality», Journal of Voice 19, pp. 555-573.
  • Benveniste, E. (1939): «Naturaleza del signo lingüístico», Problemas de lingüística general, México, Siglo XXI, 1971.
  • Bolinger, D. (1964): «Intonation across languages», en Greenberg, J., Ferguson, C. y Moravesik, E. (eds.), Universals of human language, Vol. 2, Phonology, Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp. 471-524.
  • Burkhardt, F. y Sendlmeier, W.F. (2000): «Verification of acoustical correlates of emotional speech using formant-synthesis», en Cowie, R., Douglas-Cosie, E. y Schröder, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the ISCA workshop on speech and emotion: A conceptual framework for research, Belfast, Queen’s University, pp. 151-156.
  • Catford, J.C. (1977): Fundamental problems in phonetics, Edimburgo, Edinburgh University Press.
  • Darwin, C. (1984): La expresión de las emociones en los animales y el hombre, Madrid, Alianza [1872].
  • Fischer, A. (1999): «What if anything, is phonological iconicity?», en Nänny, M. y Fischer, O. (eds.), Form, miming meaning: Iconicity in language and literature, Filadelfia, John Benjamins.
  • Fonagy, I. (1978): «A new method of investigating the perception of prosodic features», Language and Speech 21, pp. 34-49.
  • Frick, R.W. (1985): «Communicating emotion: The role of prosodic features», Psychological Bulletin 97, 3, pp. 412-429.
  • Gil Fernández, J. 2007: Fonética para profesores de español: de la teoría a la práctica, Madrid, Arco/Libros.
  • Gobl, C. y Ní Chasaide, A. (2003): «The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude», Speech Communication 40, pp. 189-212.
  • Gordon, M., y Ladefoged, P. (2001): «Phonation types: a cross-linguistic overview», Journal of Phonetics 29, 4, pp. 383-406.
  • Hinton, L., Nichols, J. y Ohala, J. (eds.) (1994): Sound symbolism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Huron, D., Kinney, D., Precoda, K. (2006): «Influence of pitch height on the perception of submisiveness and threat in musical passages», Empirical Musicology Review 1, 3, pp. 170-177.
  • Jakobson, R. (1968): Child language, aphasia and phonological universals, La Haya, Mouton.
  • —, y Waugh, L.R. (1979): «El encanto de los sonidos del habla», La forma sonora de la lengua, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1987, pp. 172-222.
  • Jespersen, O. (1922): «Sound symbolism», Language, its nature, development and origin, Londres, George Allen, pp. 396-411.
  • Kreiman, J. y Sidtis, D. (2011): Foundations of voice studies. An interdisciplinary approach to voice production and perception, Malden, Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B.R., Garellek, M., Samlan, R., y Zhang, Z. (2014): «Toward a unified theory of voice production and perception», Loquens 1, 1, e009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2014.009
  • Laukkanen, A.M., Vilkman, E., Alku, P., y Oksanen, H. (1996): «Physical variation related to stress and emotionally state: a preliminary study», Journal of Phonetics 24, pp. 313-335.
  • Laver, J. (1968): «Voice quality and indexical information», International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 3, 1, pp. 43-54.
  • —, (1980): The phonetic description of voice quality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Leino, T. (2009): «Long-term average spectrum in screening of voice quality in speech: Untrained Male University Students», Journal of Voice 23, pp. 671-676.
  • Lieberman, P. (1967): Intonation, perception, and language, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  • Lindsley, D.B. (1951): «Emotion», en Stevens, S.S. (ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology, Nueva York, Wiley, pp. 437-516.
  • Moos, A., Smith, R. y Simmons, D. (2011): «Voice quality perceptions by synaesthetes, phoneticians and controls», Proceedings of the 17th International congress of phonetic sciences (ICPhS), pp. 1426-1429.
  • Moos, A., Simmons, D., Simner, J. y Smith, R. (2013): «Colour and texture associations in voice-induced synaesthesia», Frontiers in Psychology 4, 568, pp 1-12.
  • Morton, E. (1994): «Sound symbolism and its role in non-human vertebrate communication», en Hinton, L., Nichols, J. y Ohala, J. (eds.), Sound symbolism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 348-365.
  • Ní Chasaide, A. y Gobl, C. (2005): «On the relation between phonatory quality and affect», en Hardcastle, W. y Mackenzie Beck, J. (eds.), A figure of speech: A festschrift for John Laver, Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbrum pp. 323-346.
  • Ohala, J.J. (1983): «Cross-language use of pitch: An ethological view», Phonetica 40, pp. 1-18.
  • —, (1984): «An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice», Phonetica 41, pp. 1-16.
  • Plack, C.J. (2005): The sense of hearing, Nueva York, Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Poyatos, F. (1994): La comunicación no verbal, Madrid, Istmo.
  • Reich, A.R. y Lerman, J.W. (1978): «Teflon laryngoplasty: an acoustical and perceptual study», Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 43, pp. 496–505.
  • Sapir, E. (1929): «A study in phonetic symbolism», Journal of Experimental Psychology 12, 3, pp. 225-239.
  • Scherer, K.R. (1974): «Acoustic concomitants of emotional dimensions: Judging affect from synthesized tone sequences», en Weitz, S. (ed.), Non-verbal communication, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, pp. 105-111.
  • —, (1986): «Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research», Psychological Bulletin 99, pp. 143-165.
  • Scherer, K.R. y Oshinsky, J.S. (1977): «Cue utilization in emotion attribution from auditory stimuli», Motivation and Emotion 1, pp. 331-346.
  • Spence, C. (2012): «Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism», Journal of Consumer Psychology 22, pp. 37-54.
  • Sundberg, J, Titze, I.R. y Scherer, R. (1993): «Phonatory control in male singers: a study of the effects of subglottal pressure, fundamental frequency, and mode of phonation on the voice source», Journal of Voice 7, pp. 15-29.
  • Sundberg, J. (1994): «Vocal fold vibration patterns and phonatory modes», STLQPSR, Estocolmo, Royal Institute of Technology.
  • Tsur, R. (2006): «Size-sound symbolism revisited», Journal of Pragmatics 38, pp. 905-924.
  • Yorkston, E.A. y Menon, G. (2004): «A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgements», Journal of Consumer Research 31, pp. 43-51.
Data source: Dialnet