Estudio del espesor corneal central mediante técnicas de no contactomicroscopio especular (Nidex CEM-530), tomógrafo corneal (Pentacam HR) y tomógrafo de coherencia óptica (Cirrus HD-OCT 5000) en pacientes adultos sanos

  1. González-Rodríguez, Patricia
  2. Blázquez-Sánchez, Vanesa
  3. Fernández-Cuenca, Sara
Aldizkaria:
Ciencia y Tecnología para la Salud Visual y Ocular

ISSN: 1692-8415,  2389-8801

Argitalpen urtea: 2018

Alea: 16

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 25-31

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.19052/SV.4365 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Ciencia y Tecnología para la Salud Visual y Ocular

Laburpena

Objective: To study and compare the value of central corneal thickness in a healthy adult population, using different non-contact techniques from daily clinical practice. Method: This work examines and compares the pachymetric measurements of 71 eyes of 36 healthy adult patients. Corneal thickness was evaluated using three non-contact instruments: a CEM-530 specular microscope (Nidek), Pentacam HR corneal tomography (Oculus), and Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 optical coherence tomography (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Tests were performed consecutively by a single observer in the same session and under the same environmental conditions. Results: The results obtained using the three devices are interchangeable, given that no statistically significant difference was observed among them. The study did not find statistically significant difference with respect to gender either. Conclusion: These three non-contact methods for the measurement of corneal central pachymetry are a reliable alternative to ultrasonic contact pachymetry.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Ayala M, Standas R. Accuracy of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in pachymetry for glaucoma pa- tients. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:124.
  • Blanco García O, Blanco García N, Guerrero Vargas J. Topografía Pentacam Oculus. https://issuu.com/centinel/docs/manual_pentacam_oculus
  • Bourges JL, Alfonsi N, Laliberté JF, Chagnon M, Renard G, Legeais JM. Average 3-dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas. Arq Bras Ophthalmol. 2009;116(11):312-4.
  • Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001;108(10):1779-88.
  • Calvo Sanz JA, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Sánchez-Tena MA. Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness. J Optom. 2017. 10.1016/j.optom.2016.12.004
  • Cevik SD, Rahmi R,Cevik MT, Kivanc SA. Comparison of central thickness estimates by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016;79(5):312-4.
  • De Bernardo M, Borrelli M, Mariniello M,Lanza M, Rosa N. Pentacamvs SP3000P specular microscopy in measuring corneal thickness. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(1):21-7.
  • Federico V, Pravato ML, Cremonini P, Chialvo A. Comparación del espesor corneal central: Orbscan II versus paquimetría ultrasónica. Oftalmol Clin. 2009;3(2):46-52.
  • Fernández Cuenca S, Blázquez Sánchez V, Hurtado FJ. Estudio comparativo de medidas de espesor corneal mediante paquimetría ultrasónica, topógrafo corneal (Oculyzer) y tomografía de coherencia óptica (OCT) de polo anterior. Gaceta Óptica. 2014;(491):24-8.
  • Fujioka M, Nakamura M, Tatsumi Y, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A. Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32(2):89-94.
  • Gros-Otero J, Arruabarrena-Sánchez C, Teus M. Espesor corneal central en una población sana española. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2011;86(3):73-6.
  • Hekimoglu E, Kazim Enol M, Toslak D, Turgut D, Doğan B, Yucel O. Comparison of measurement of central corneal thickness with spectral domain optical coherence tomography and standard ultrasonic pachymeter in premature infants. J Opthalmol. 2015. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525755/
  • Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS, Feuer WJ, Barton K. Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography ultrasound pachemetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):228-32.
  • Leung DY, Lam DK, Yeung BY, Lam DS. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymeter and optical coherence tomography. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34(8):751-4.
  • Li EY, Mohamed S, Leung CK, Rao SK, Cheng AC, Cheung CY, Lam DS. Agreement among 3 method to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pahcymetry, Orbscan II and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(10):1842-47.
  • Liu Z, Pugheider SC. Corneal thickness is reduced in dry eye. Cornea. 1999;18:403-7.
  • López de la Rosa A. Actualización en técnicas de paquimetría [thesis]. [Valladolid]: Universidad de Valladolid; 2014.
  • Miranda Hernández I, Fernández García K, Ruiz Rodríguez Y, Hernández Silva JR, Rio Torres M. Comparación de los valores del espesor corneal central según los equipos Lenstar, Galilei y Pentacam. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2012;25(1):65-71.
  • Weise K, Kaminski B, Melia M, Repka M, Bradfield Y, Davitt B. Intraobserver reliability of contact pachymetry in children. J AAPOS. 2013 apr;17(2)144- 48.
  • Zhao PS, Wong TY, Wong WL, Saw AM, Aung T. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement by visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography with ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;147(6):1047-50.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet