Digital divides across consumers of internet services in Spain using panel data 2007-2019. Narrowing or not?

  1. Teodosio Pérez-Amaral 1
  2. Angel Valarezo 1
  3. Rafael López 1
  4. Teresa Garín-Muñoz 2
  1. 1 ICAE, UCM
  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Journal:
Documentos de Trabajo (ICAE)

ISSN: 2341-2356

Year of publication: 2021

Issue: 1

Pages: 1-29

Type: Working paper

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDocta Complutense editor

More publications in: Documentos de Trabajo (ICAE)

Abstract

Digital gaps have the potential to exacerbate the inequalities that exist in society. The main objective of this paper is to study the gaps that occur in the use of internet services by households in Spain during the period 2007-2019 and to become useful in the design of policies addressed to narrow specific digital divides. The data is a panel obtained from the ICT-H Survey on Households of the National Statistics Institute. This paper defines the gaps as the differences in the use of internet services across individual consumers.A selected group of twelve digital services are considered: e-commerce, e-selling, e-tourism, e-learning, e-health, ebanking, e-government, VoIP, chat, email, cloud services, and social networks. The second level digital gaps are analyzed in each service according to six relevant socio-demographic characteristics: gender, age, education, digital skills, population size, and income. A set of graphs show the evolution of the gaps. Gaps are narrowing in most dimensions and specific characteristics, but not in others such as age, education, and digital skills. The gaps reveal the evolution of digitization and in some cases of digital exclusion for specific groups. Specific knowledge about digital gaps is useful for policymakers, since closing the digital divide is an explicit policy goal in this country, as well as in other parts of Europe. Then, a dynamic panel data model was proposed and estimated using Arellano and Bond techniques. A dynamic/network effect was found, as well as other socio-demographic determinants. Finally, the paper contains conclusions, policy recommendations and an agenda for future research. The policy recommendations consist of digital education programs targeted at the most exposed groups such as the elderly, the less well-educated and people with lower digital skills.

Bibliographic References

  • Bach, M. P., Zoroja, J., & Vukšić, V. B. (2013). Determinants of firms’ Digital Divide: A Review of Recent Research. Procedia Technology, 9, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.013
  • Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2006). Gaps and Bits: Conceptualising Measurements for Digital Divide/s. The Information Society, 22(5), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600903953
  • Cava-Ferreruela, I., & Alabau-Muñoz, A. (2006). Broadband policy assessment: A crossnational empirical analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 30(8), 445– 463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2005.12.002
  • Cerno, L., & Pérez-Amaral, T. (2006). Demand for Internet Access and Use in Spain. In B. Preissl & J. Müller (Eds.), Governance of Communication Networks: Connecting Societies and Markets with I.T. (pp. 333–353). Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1746-5_18
  • Demoussis, M., & Giannakopoulos, N. (2006). Facets of the digital divide in Europe: Determination and extent of internet use. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500216016
  • European Commission. (2019). Human Capital and Digital Skills [Text]. Digital Single Market- European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/human-capital
  • European Commission. (2020). The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Shaping Europe’s Digital Future - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi
  • Garín-Muñoz, T., López, R., Pérez-Amaral, T., Herguera, I., & Valarezo, Á. (2019). Models for individual adoption of eCommerce, eBanking and eGovernment in Spain. Telecommunications Policy, 43(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.01.002
  • Hacker, K. L., & Mason, S. M. (2003). Ethical gaps in studies of the digital divide. Ethics and Information Technology, 5(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024968602974
  • Hargittai, E. (2001). Second-Level Digital Divide: Mapping Differences in People’s Online Skills. ArXiv:Cs/0109068. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0109068
  • Helsper, E. J., & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2015). The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? In Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Vol. 10, pp. 29–52). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
  • Hilbert, M. (2011). The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 715–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.012
  • Hilbert, M. (2016). The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014. Telecommunications Policy, 40(6), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.01.006
  • INE. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. National Statistics Institute. Spanish Statistical Office. (2020). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los hogares. INE. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176741&menu=ulti Datos&idp=1254735576692
  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2019). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2019. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration, NTIA. (1995). FALLING THROUGH THE NET: A Survey of the “Have Nots” “in Rural and Urban America. https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html
  • Nishijima, M., Ivanauskas, T. M., & Sarti, F. M. (2017). Evolution and determinants of digital divide in Brazil (2005–2013). Telecommunications Policy, 41(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.10.004
  • OECD. (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide (OECD Digital Economy Paper No. 49). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/236405667766
  • Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata. Social Science Research, 36(3), 1135–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.09.001
  • Pérez-Amaral, T., Gallo, G. M., & White, H. (2003). Flexible Tool for Model Building: The Relevant Transformation of the Inputs Network Approach (RETINA). Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucm/doicae/0309.html
  • Pérez-Amaral, T., Valarezo, Á ., López, R., Garín-Muñoz, T., & Herguera, I. (2020). Ecommerce by individuals in Spain using panel data 2008–2016. Telecommunications Policy, 44(4), 101888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101888
  • Pérez-Hernández, J., & Sánchez-Mangas, R. (2011). To have or not to have Internet at home: Implications for online shopping. Information Economics and Policy, 23(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2011.03.003
  • Ruiz-Rodríguez, F., Lucendo-Monedero, A. L., & González-Relaño, R. (2018). Measurement and characterization of the Digital Divide of Spanish regions at enterprise level. A comparative analysis with the European context. Telecommunications Policy, 42(3), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.11.007
  • Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
  • Srinuan, C. & Bohlin, E. (2011). Understanding the digital divide: A literature survey and ways forward. 22nd European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): Budapest, Hungary.
  • Szeles, M. R. (2018). New insights from a multilevel approach to the regional digital divide in the European Union. Telecommunications Policy, 42(6), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.03.007
  • Valarezo, Á., López, R., & Pérez Amaral, T. (2020). Adoption of E-Commerce by Individuals and Digital-Divide. In J. Alleman, P. N. Rappoport, & M. Hamoudia (Eds.), Applied Economics in the Digital Era: Essays in Honor of Gary Madden (pp. 103–134). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40601-1_4
  • Valarezo, Á., Pérez-Amaral, T., Garín-Muñoz, T., Herguera García, I., & López, R. (2018). Drivers and barriers to cross-border e-commerce: Evidence from Spanish individual behavior. Telecommunications Policy, 42(6), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.03.006
  • van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
  • Vehovar, V., Sicherl, P., Hüsing, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2006). Methodological Challenges of Digital Divide Measurements. The Information Society, 22(5), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600904076
  • Zhao, F., Collier, A., & Deng, H. (2014). A multidimensional and integrative approach to study global digital divide and e-government development. Information Technology & People, 27(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2013-0022
  • Zoroja, J. (2011). Internet, E-commerce and E-government: Measuring the Gap between European Developed and Post-CommunistCountries.Interdisciplinary Description ofComplex Systems, 9(2), 119– 133.
Data source: Dialnet