As abordagens teóricas da competição interjurisdicional e os percalços analíticos da dinâmica federativapor uma perspectiva totalizante

  1. Renato Luis Pinto Miranda
  2. Heriberto Cairo Carou
  3. Rosa de la Fuente Fernández
Revista:
Nova Economia

ISSN: 0103-6351

Año de publicación: 2014

Año: 24

Número: 3

Páginas: 645-667

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1590/0103-6351/1836 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Nova Economia

Resumen

The following research investigates the analytical assumptions used in the hegemonic theories of the economy of the public sector (Welfare Economics, Public Choice Theory and New Institutional Economics) in the study of interjurisdictional competition, by identifying its limitations. It suggests, subsequently, a new conceptual form of the subject using a historical-concrete approach. The federative dynamic is conceived from this hegemonic theories as the product of a "game", composed of maximizing rational agents. It disregards, however, the influence exerted by social macro-structures in the composition of its movements. In light of this, the approach to the outlines assumed by the federative arrangement, from the contradictions expressed in its own institutional existence, is proposed here, while conceiving this as a constitutionally interdependent phenomenon to the conformance of the of space-time matrices of the standard of accumulation.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ABRUCIO, F. L., COSTA, V. M. F.. (1999). Reforma do Estado e o contexto federativo brasileiro. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. São Paulo.
  • ACIR, U. S.. (1991). Interjurisdictional Tax and Policy Competition: Good or Bad for the Federal System?.
  • AFFONSO, R. B. A.. (2003). O Federalismo e as teorias hegemônicas da Economia do Setor Público na segunda metade do séculoXX: um balanço crítico. Instituto de Economia, Unicamp. Campinas.
  • AFFONSO, R. B. Á., SILVA, P. L. B.. (1995). A Federação em perspectiva: Ensaios selecionados. Fundap (Série Federalismo no Brasil). São Paulo.
  • ARROW, K. J.. (1963). Social choice and individual values. John Wiley. New York.
  • BLANKART, C. B.. (2002). A public choice view of tax competition. Public Finance Review.
  • BONEFELD, W.. (1999). Globalization and state: A note on Joachim Hirsch. Studies in Political Economy.
  • BRANDÃO, C. A.. (2004). A dimensão espacial do subdesenvolvimento: Uma agenda para os estudos urbanos e regionais. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Campinas.
  • BUCHANAN, J., TULLOCK, G.. (1993). El cálculo del consenso - fundamentos lógicos de la democracia constitucional. Planeta-Agostini. Barcelona.
  • BUCHANAN, J. M.. (1995). Federalism as an ideal political order and an objective for constitutional reform. Publius: The Journal of Federalism.
  • BUCHANAN, J. M.. (1995). Federalism and individual sovereignty. Cato Journal.
  • CALIENDO, P.. (2008). Direito Tributário e Análise Econômica do Direito. Elsevier. Rio de Janeiro.
  • DYE, T. R.. (1990). American federalism: Competition among governments. Lexington Books. Massachusetts.
  • ELSTER, J.. (1989). Marx hoje. Paz e Terra. São Paulo.
  • FERREIRA, S. G., VARSANO, R., AFONSO, J. R.. (2005). Inter-jurisdictional fiscal competition: A review of the literature and policy recommendations. Revista de Economia Política.
  • FILIPPOV, Mikhail. (2005). Riker and Federalism. Constitutional Political Economy.
  • FIORI, J. L.. (1995). A Federação em perspectiva. Fundap. São Paulo.
  • GOODSPEED, T. J.. (1998). Tax competition, benefit taxes and fiscal federalism. National Tax Journal.
  • GOODSPEED, Timothy J.. (2002). Bailouts in a Federation. International Tax and Public Finance.
  • HARMES, A.. (2007). The Political Economy of Open Federalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science.
  • HARRIS, J., HUNTER, J., LEWIS, M. C.. (1995). The new institucional economics and the third world development. Routledge. London.
  • HARVEY, D.. (2007). Espacios del capital: Hacia una geografía crítica. Akal. Madrid.
  • HARVEY, D.. (2004). La condición de la posmodernidad. Investigación sobre los orígenes del cambio cultural. Amorrortu Editores. Buenos Aires.
  • HIRSCH, J., KANNANKULAM, J.. (2010). The spaces of capital: The political form of capitalism and the internationalization of the State. Antipode.
  • HIRSCH, J.. (1996). Globalización, capital y Estado. UAM-X, CSH, Depto. De Relaciones Sociales. México, DF.
  • INMAN, R. P.. (2003). Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
  • JESSOP, B.. (1999). The changing governance of Welfare: Recent trends in its primary functions, scale, and modes of coordination. Social Policy & Administration.
  • JESSOP, B.. (2000). The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
  • JESSOP, B.. (2000). Knowledge, Space, Economy. Routledge. London.
  • JESSOP, B.. (2008). El futuro del Estado capitalista. Los Libros de La Catarata. Madrid.
  • JESSOP, B.. (2009). O Estado, o poder, o socialismo de Poulantzas como um clássico moderno. Rev. Sociol. Polít..
  • KENYON, D. A.. (1997). Theories of interjurisdictional competition. New England Economic Review.
  • KORNAI, J.. (1986). The soft budget constraint. Kyklos.
  • KOSIK, K.. (1976). Dialética do concreto. Paz e Terra. Rio de Janeiro.
  • LENGYEL, E.. (1997). Globalización, capital y Estado. (Resenha). Política y Cultura.
  • LYNCH, G. P.. (2004). Protecting individual rights through a federal system: James Buchanan's view of Federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism.
  • MCGUIRE, T.. (1991). Competition Among States and Local Governments. The Urban Institute Press. Washington, D. C..
  • NICOLAS, D. H.. (1998). Território, Globalização e Fragmentação. Hucitec. São Paulo.
  • OATES, Wallace E.. (2005). Toward a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance.
  • OATES, Wallace E.. (1990). Readings in public sector economics. D. C. Heath and Company.
  • OATES, W. E., SCHWAB, R. M.. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency-enhancing or distortion-inducing?. Journal of Public Economics.
  • OFFE, Claus.. (1990). Contradiciones del Estado del bienestar. Alianza Editorial, S. A.. Madrid.
  • OFFE, Claus.. (1974). Structural problems of the Capitalist State: Class rule and the political system. On the selevtiveness of political institutions. German Politcal Studies.
  • OLIVEIRA, F.. (2007). Teorias da Federação e do Federalismo Fiscal: O caso brasileiro. Escola de Governo da Fundação João Pinheiro. Minas Gerais.
  • PAULANI, L. M.. (1996). Hayek e o individualismo metodológico no discurso econômico. Lua Nova.
  • POSSAS, M. L.. (2004). Eficiência seletiva: Uma perspectiva neo-schumpeteriana evolucionária sobre questões econômicas normativas. Revista de Economia Política.
  • POULANTZAS, N.. (1980). Estado, poder y socialismo. Siglo XXI de España Editores S. A.. Madrid.
  • PRZEWORSKI, A., WALLERSTEIN, M.. (1988). O capitalismo democrático na encruzilhada. Novos Estudos Cebrap.
  • PRZEWORSKI, A.. (1988). Marxismo e escolha racional.
  • RIKER, W. H.. (1964). Federalism: Origin, operation, significance. Little Brown and Company. Boston.
  • RODDEN, J., ESKELAND, G. S., LITVACK, J.. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of the hard budget constraint. MIT Press. Cambridge.
  • SAMUELSON, P. A.. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics.
  • SANTOS, Milton. (2001). Por uma outra globalização: Do pensamento único à consciência universal. Record. Rio de Janeiro.
  • SARAIVA, J. F. S.. (2004). A busca de um novo paradigma: Política exterior, comércio externo e federalismo no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional.
  • SCHNELLENBACH, J.. (2005). The Dahrendorf hypothesis and its implications for (the theory of) economic policy-making. Cambridge Journal of Economics.
  • SORENS, J.. (2010). The Institutions of Fiscal Federalism. PubliusThe Journal of Federalism.
  • (1997). World development report 1997 - The state in a changing world. Oxford University Press. New York.
  • (2000). World development report 1999/2000 - Entering the 21st century. Oxford University Press. New York.
  • THÉRET, B.. (2004). Del principio federal a una topología de las federaciones: Algunas propuestas. Foro Internacional.
  • THÉRET, B.. (1995). Du federalisme et de la protection sociale em Amerique et em particulier au Canada. Rapport pour La convention d'étude.
  • VARSANO, R. B.. (1997). A guerra fiscal do ICMS: Quem ganha e quem perde. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas.
  • VARGAS, N. C.. (2006). Estados no Brasil e o controle fiscal e financeiro pela União no pós-real. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Campinas.
  • VOLDEN, C.. (2004). Origin, operation, and significance: The Federalism of William H. Riker. Publius: The Journal of Federalism.
  • WILSON, John D.. (1999). Theories of Tax Competition. National Tax Journal.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet