Atención en los medios sociales de la investigación sobre aceite de oliva: opinión pública e investigación

Referencias bibliográficas

• Altmetrics.com, “How is the Altmetric Attention Score calculated?”, disponible en: https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000060969-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated- [Última consulta 19/03/2020]
• Álvarez-Bornstein, B., y Montesi, M. (2019). Who is interacting with researchers on Twitter? A survey in the field of Information Science. JLIS. it, 10(2), 87-106.
• Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Montesi, M. (2019a). Investigación interdisciplinaria e impacto social: análisis de menciones en los medios sociales. IX Encuentro Ibérico EDICIC, Barcelona, 9-11 de Julio. Disponible en: https://fima.ub.edu/edicic2019/sites/edicic2019/ files/ 2019-05/091.pdf [Última consulta: 13/04/2020]
• Bik, H. M., y Goldstein, M. C. (2013). An introduction to social media for scientists. PLoS biology, 11(4), e1001535.
• Blundo-Canto, G., Triomphe, B., Faure, G., Barret, D., De Romemont, A., y Hainzelin, E. (2019). Building a culture of impact in an international agricultural research organization: Process and reflective learning. Research Evaluation, 28(2), 136-144.
• Bornmann, L. (2012). Measuring the societal impact of research. EMBO Reports, 13(8), 673- 676.
• Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217-233.
• Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., y Adams, J. (2019). Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF). Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 325-340.
• Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., y Marx, W. (2016). Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1477-1495.
• Boyd, D., Golder, S., y Lotan, G. (2010, January). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
• Bozeman, B., Youtie, J. (2017). Socio-economic impacts and public value of government-funded research: lessons from four US National Science Foundation initiatives. Research Policy, 46(8), 1387-1398.
• Buxton, M., Hanney, S. (1996). How can payback from health services research be assessed?. Journal of health services research y policy, 1(1), 35-43.
• Ciarli, T., Ràfols, I. (2019). The relation between research priorities and societal demands: the case of rice. Research Policy, 48(4), 949-967.
• De Jong, S., Barker, K., Cox, D., Sveinsdottir, T., y Van den Besselaar, P. (2014). Understanding societal impact through productive interactions: ICT research as a case. Research Evaluation, 23(2), 89-102.
• Demiryürek, K. (2010). Information systems and communication networks for agriculture and rural people. Agricultural Economics, 56(5), 209-214.
• Douthwaite, B., Kuby, T., van de Fliert, E., y Schulz, S. (2003). Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems. Agricultural systems, 78(2), 243-265.
• Faure, G., Barret, D., Blundo-Canto, G., Dabat, M. H., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., Le Guerroué, J. L., ... y Triomphe, B. (2018). How different agricultural research models contribute to impacts: Evidence from 13 case studies in developing countries. Agricultural Systems, 165, 128-136.
• Faure, G., Blundo-Canto, G., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., Le Guerroué, J. L., Mathé, S., Temple, L., ... y Hainzelin, E. (2020). A participatory method to assess the contribution of agricultural research to societal changes in developing countries. Research Evaluation, rvz036.
• Fryirs, K. A., Brierley, G. J., y Dixon, T. (2019). Engaging with research impact assessment for an environmental science case study. Nature communications, 10(1), 1-10.
• Gaunand, A., Hocde, A., Lemarié, S., Matt, M., y de Turckheim, E. (2015). How does public agricultural research impact society? A characterization of various patterns. Research Policy, 44(4), 849-861.
• Greenhalgh, T., Raftery, J., Hanney, S., y Glover, M. (2016). Research impact: a narrative review. BMC Medicine, 14(1), 1.
• Holmberg, K. J. (2015). Altmetrics for information professionals: Past, present and future. Chandos Publishing.
• Janker, J., Mann, S. (2018). Understanding the social dimension of sustainability in agriculture: A critical review of sustainability assessment tools. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-21.
• Jeng, W., He, D., y Jiang, J. (2015). User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), pp. 890-904.
• Joly, P. B., Gaunand, A., Colinet, L., Larédo, P., Lemarié, S., y Matt, M. (2015). ASIRPA: A comprehensive theory-based approach to assessing the societal impacts of a research organization. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 440-453.
• Kostagiolas, P., Souliotis, A., & Boskou, G. (2014). Online producers: studying the information needs and internet seeking behavior in the agricultural sector. International Information & Library Review, 46(3-4), 137-148.
• Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. (2015). Patent citation analysis with Google. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 48-61.
• Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. (2014). Science blogging: An exploratory study of motives, styles, and audience reactions. Journal of science Communication, 13(3), A05.
• Matt, M., Gaunand, A., Joly, P. B., y Colinet, L. (2017). Opening the black box of impact–Ideal-type impact pathways in a public agricultural research organization. Research Policy, 46(1), 207-218.
• Miettinen, R., Tuunainen, J., y Esko, T. (2015). Epistemological, artefactual and interactional–institutional foundations of social impact of academic research. Minerva, 53(3), 257-277.
• Noyons, E., y Ràfols, I. (2018, September). Can bibliometrics help in assessing societal contributions of agricultural research? Exploring societal interactions across research areas. In 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018), September 12-14, 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS).
• Ortega, J. L. (2020). Altmetrics data providers: A metaanalysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication. El profesional de la información (EPI), 29(1).
• Ozanne, J. L., Davis, B., Murray, J. B., Grier, S., Benmecheddal, A., Downey, H., Ekpo, A.E. y Garnier, M., Hietanen, J., Le Gall-Ely, M., Seregina, A., Thomas, K.D., Verr, E. (2016). Assessing the Societal Impact of Research: The Relational Engagement Approach. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36(1), 1-14.
• Parra-Lopez, C., De-Haro-Giménez, T., y Calatrava-Requena, J. (2007). Diffusion and adoption of organic farming in the southern Spanish olive groves. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 30(1), 105-151.
• Pérez-Rodríguez, A. V., González-Pedraz, C., y Alonso Berrocal, J. L. (2018). Twitter como herramienta de comunicación científica en España. Principales agentes y redes de comunicación. Communication Papers, 7(13), 95-112.
• Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., Isett, K., Melkers, J., y Hicks, D. (2017). The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles. PloS one, 12(8), e0183551.
• Spaapen, J., y Van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), pp. 211-218.
• Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., y Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062.
• Tahamtan, I., y Bornmann, L. (2020). Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review. El profesional de la información (EPI), 29(1).
• Tattersall, A., y Carroll, C. (2018). What can altmetric. com Tell Us about Policy citations of research? an analysis of altmetric. com Data for research articles from the University of sheffield. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2, 9.
• Temple, L., Barret, D., Blundo Canto, G., Dabat, M. H., Devaux-Spatarakis, A., Faure, G., ... y Triomphe, B. (2018). Assessing impacts of agricultural research for development: A systemic model focusing on outcomes. Research Evaluation, 27(2), 157-170.
• Temple, L., Biénabe, E., Barret, D., y Saint-Martin, G. (2016). Methods for assessing the impact of research on innovation and development in the agriculture and food sectors. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 8(5-6), 399-410.
• Thelwall, M., y Delgado, M. M. (2015). Arts and humanities research evaluation: No metrics please, just data. Journal of Documentation, 71(4), 817-833.
• Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N., y Kraines, S. B. (2013). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 151-179.
• Weißhuhn, P., Helming, K., y Ferretti, J. (2018). Research impact assessment in agriculture—A review of approaches and impact areas. Research Evaluation, 27(1), 36-42.
• Wolf, B., Lindenthal, T., Szerencsits, M., Holbrook, J. B., y Heß, J. (2013). Evaluating Research beyond Scientific Impact. How to Include Criteria for Productive Interactions and Impact on Practice and Society. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 22(2), 104-114.